Why We Need Gun Restrictions

[tff]

We don’t need more gun restrictions...We need fewer thieves.

Allowing the public to play the role of judge, jury, and executioner will do more harm than good.

So if someone commits a crime against you, you are going to stand and take it and then hope you survive to press charges? People are not allowed to defend themselves? Yeah, I can't see how that will blow up in your face.

I don't think we should be allowed to shoot thieves.

 

[RB 60]

The reference to the mail delivery went right over your head, didn’t it, moron?

How do those farmers get their produce to maket, Einstein? Wagon train?

You make idiots look intelligent

 

[domer76]

You make idiots look intelligent

WHOOSH! lol

 

[RB 60]

WHOOSH! lol

OK dickhead, get back to the subject.
Just what new firearm restrictions would have prevented that psycho who shot up that Jewish church from doing it?

 

[domer76]

OK dickhead, get back to the subject.
Just what new firearm restrictions would have prevented that psycho who shot up that Jewish church from doing it?

lol

Back to that same old barrel-stroker’s mantra.

 

[Airstrip One]

I don't think we should be allowed to shoot thieves.

Should we be allowed to steal?

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Find any mention of inalienable rights in the Constitution, idiot.

I’ll wait

this is why you're the dumbest fucker on the forum. the constitution doesn't give us rights, idiot. it gives the government specific and limited powers.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

lol

Two idiots that think modern societies can function without vehicles.

you seemed to have moved the goal posts again, fuckstick. you started saying that vehicles are NECESSARY........now it's just function. must be difficult being that fucking stupid.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Actually, you make the mentally ill look like geniuses. The first case involving the right to travel, or the right of motivation, was in 1823, and many of the Founding Fathers were alive at the time, and they were not laughing.n See if you have the ability to learn anything from this:

http://www.uslawbooks.com/travel/travelcites.htm

dude, you're making the same argument as me..........can you not see that?

 

[Rune]

Hey dumb fuck, TY for proving once again how low IQ freaks can even speak out of their asses. Did your wee little mind purposely ignore this part, or is it just your genetic defect showing up:

a dangerous and deadly loophole in federal gun laws

Now dumb fuck, what is the "loophole" they are speaking of?

"Federal law imposes various duties on federally licensed firearms dealers.

Wait a minute. Federal Law does not apply to private sales? Well, some fucking idiots seem to think it does. What has happened, and it seems 5 States have joined the 6 I listed, is that 11 States have now adopted the universal background check:

"Eleven states (California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington) and the District of Columbia require universal background"

But since you did nto even read what you posted, much less the entire article, you missed this:

"In 2016, Virginia enacted a law requiring the state police to be available at gun shows in order to facilitate voluntary background checks requested by either party to a transaction if the seller is unlicensed."

Keyword here, which is beyond your comprehension, is "VOLUNTARY", and only if one of the parties request such be done.

Keep it up stupid. I have nothing better to do on these cold mornings then to show how fucking idiots like you are still around.

Moron: go to any gun show anywhere and try to buy an illegal gun.
See you in 15-20 (years).
You see, there is this little federal agency known as BATF
which has nothing better to do than arrest anyone involved in illegal gun trafficking and there are agents at every single show.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Moron: go to any gun show anywhere and try to buy an illegal gun.
See you in 15-20 (years).
You see, there is this little federal agency known as BATF
which has nothing better to do than arrest anyone involved in illegal gun trafficking and there are agents at every single show.

the only real problem with this is that the federal government was given ZERO constitutional power over our firearms. so sayeth the framers.

 

[Rune]

the only real problem with this is that the federal government was given ZERO constitutional power over our firearms. so sayeth the framers.

Then BATF shouldn't exist.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Then BATF shouldn't exist.

drop the F then its possible they should exist. they were originally a tax collection agency for alcohol and tobacco. even that existence is questionable.

 

[domer76]

you seemed to have moved the goal posts again, fuckstick. you started saying that vehicles are NECESSARY........now it's just function. must be difficult being that fucking stupid.

Words are difficult for you, aren’t they, idiot?

 

[domer76]

the only real problem with this is that the federal government was given ZERO constitutional power over our firearms. so sayeth the framers.

^ Stupid fuck can’t even keep track of SCOTUS decisions.

Fucking retard

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Words are difficult for you, aren’t they, idiot?

not at all. i have a genius level vocabulary compared to your grade school education. do you need shit dumbed down for you some more?

 

[SmarterthanYou]

^ Stupid fuck can’t even keep track of SCOTUS decisions.

Fucking retard

WHO wrote the constitution, moron? SCOTUS has made so many wrong decisions over the past 200 years that we barely have the actual constitution anymore. But a government cock sucking fuckstick like you prefers fascism to freedom.

 

[domer76]

not at all. i have a genius level vocabulary compared to your grade school education. do you need shit dumbed down for you some more?

My claim, all along, in contradiction to your massively stupid one, is that vehicles are necessary for a modern society to function.

Get it, you illiterate fuckwad?

Yet, you claim, they are not. Really, that continues to be, by far, the stupidest fucking post ever recorded.

 

[domer76]

WHO wrote the constitution, moron? SCOTUS has made so many wrong decisions over the past 200 years that we barely have the actual constitution anymore. But a government cock sucking fuckstick like you prefers fascism to freedom.

Try to rationalize it any way you want, idiot. The SCOTUS rulings are clear. There are restrictions on the possession and use of firearms. You can bitch and whine and cry and gnash your teeth til the cows come home, but your view is as stupidly wrong as it was the first time you posted.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

My claim, all along, in contradiction to your massively stupid one, is that vehicles are necessary for a modern society to function.

Get it, you illiterate fuckwad?

Yet, you claim, they are not. Really, that continues to be, by far, the stupidest fucking post ever recorded.

they are NOT. I told you, factually, that if vehicles were NECESSARY, there would be a RIGHT TO DRIVE THEM!!!!!!!!!!!! But you loathe rights, instead preferring government privilege, so your moronic and retarded brainstem cannot comprehend reality.