Give us some evidence that was the intent. I think the debates on naturalization law debated that very subject (regarding Chinese immigrants) and rejected it.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/aug/24/14th-amendment-never-meant-for-illegals/
Give us some evidence that was the intent. I think the debates on naturalization law debated that very subject (regarding Chinese immigrants) and rejected it.
Could not be any clearer.
ALL persons...not just persons whose parents are citizens already.
Think so?
Trump is going to Build a Wall.
Trump is going to ban all Muslims from entering the Country.
Trump is going to repeal Obamacare.
Blah Blah Blah, you people get duped all the time.
Trump is going to Build a Wall.
Trump is going to ban all Muslims from entering the Country.
Trump is going to repeal Obamacare.
Blah Blah Blah, you people get duped all the time.
You have it backwards. Originalism means birthright citizenship is NOT implied by the 14A.
They are the most clueless morons ever assembled!
Because they left written records, which were duly reported in the media of the day, cum gargler.
![]()
Trump is going to Build a Wall. Trump is going to repeal Obamacare.
You're right.
It's NOT implied...it's STATED OUTRIGHT.
That you ignore what is clear to virtually EVERY constitutional scholar in the USA speaks volumes.
So now the words "ALL" no longer mean all?
If you dont like the meaning, deal with this in the proper manner, not let some idiot decide that he alone is going to change it.
These things take time, Brad.
Remember when Obama was going to make sea levels recede, heal the planet, and provide good jobs?
BTW, presidents don't repeal legislation, and I don't recall Trump promising to ban "all Muslims."
You idiot.. he's talking about ambassadors and other diplomatic envoys.
They are the most clueless morons ever assembled!
These things take time, Brad.
Remember when Obama was going to make sea levels recede, heal the planet, and provide good jobs?
BTW, presidents don't repeal legislation, and I don't recall Trump promising to ban "all Muslims."
It is being dealt with in the proper manner. An amendment is not needed to change something where an amendment is being used in a manner in which those that wrote it never intended it to be used. You simply stop misusing it.
Obama seemed to think Executive actions and Orders were proper and constitutional. Embrace his legacy.
They are a basket of deplorables.
Of course they take time.