Cult of White Privilege IS EthnoMasochism

[StoneByStone]

Like beauty, it is in the eye of the beholder?

Beauty is subjective. Propaganda against Whites in movies like "Get Out" is not.

 

[iolo]

Shooting aristocrats would be a good start. They may fit into capitalism but they are still kleptocrats and a burden on societ.

What a silly notion that the general population owes someone the wealth of their productivity, allegiance and loyalty due to an accident of birth.

Fortunately our revolution ended such primitive institutions as Monarchy, Royalty and Aristocracy.

Enjoy your Fuhrer then! He is swinging more and more British people towards Monarchy!

 

[iolo]

Beauty is subjective. Propaganda against Whites in movies like "Get Out" is not.

I wouldn't know. In general, here anyway, I've scarcely ever seen any propaganda against 'Whites', who mostly died fighting back in the time of the Russian Revolution. Or do you mean some other extreme-right group?

 

[iolo]

Shooting aristocrats would be a good start. They may fit into capitalism but they are still kleptocrats and a burden on societ.

What a silly notion that the general population owes someone the wealth of their productivity, allegiance and loyalty due to an accident of birth.

Fortunately our revolution ended such primitive institutions as Monarchy, Royalty and Aristocracy.

Trumpf seems to have done pretty well out of an accident of birth, however?

 

[Mott the Hoople]

R

Any thoughts on why this is?

Racist!

No but seriously, the man is broadly traveled and makes some valid points but some of his points are gross exaggerations, others show a shocking ignorance of history and context.

Let’s give some examples of historical and cultural differences between the West and Asia that the video ignores.

Though these Asian Countries have modernized their cultures have not had the experience of a Reformation, a Renaissance, Enlightenment Revolutions or egalitarian rule.

Minorities have no rights in these Asian countries or damned few, where as Western Liberal Democracies, particularly the United States have enshrined minority rights in our Constitutional forms of government to prevent a tyranny of the majority.

This is an utterly alien concept in most, if not all, of Asia.

So in short there is nothing new here. This is a debate that began and had continued since the founding of modern liberal democracies based on Enlightenment values. We, in the West, have discovered great value in protecting minority rights and this is a huge difference between Asia and the West and has been for a long time.

 

[Mott the Hoople]

Trumpf seems to have done pretty well out of an accident of birth, however?

He should be, metaphorically, shot too.

 

[Vasquezrocks]

Just another anger black man .....

 

[StoneByStone]

Let’s give some examples of historical and cultural differences between the West and Asia that the video ignores.

Though these Asian Countries have modernized their cultures have not had the experience of a Reformation, a Renaissance, Enlightenment Revolutions or egalitarian rule.

Minorities have no rights in these Asian countries or damned few, where as Western Liberal Democracies, particularly the United States have enshrined minority rights in our Constitutional forms of government to prevent a tyranny of the majority.

This is an utterly alien concept in most, if not all, of Asia.

So in short there is nothing new here. This is a debate that began and had continued since the founding of modern liberal democracies based on Enlightenment values. We, in the West, have discovered great value in protecting minority rights and this is a huge difference between Asia and the West and has been for a long time.

Things like the Renaissance and the Enlightenment explain why we demand that all human beings have rights. However, they don't explain why so many Whites demand discrimination and propaganda against Whites, especially in our own countries. I think it's completely possible to have minority rights without ethnomasochism. The two are not incompatible.

 

[StoneByStone]

Trumpf seems to have done pretty well out of an accident of birth, however?

Trump is a great example of how bad the results of an accident of birth can be. Especially in a Capitalist country.

 

[Mott the Hoople]

Things like the Renaissance and the Enlightenment explain why we demand that all human beings have rights. However, they don't explain why so many Whites demand discrimination and propaganda against Whites, especially in our own countries. I think it's completely possible to have minority rights without ethnomasochism. The two are not incompatible.

I think it’s a psuedo intellectual phrase, like toxic masculinity, that means nothing more than fashionable jargon.

These are old fights and old arguments. This debate about the pluralistic nature of our country has been going on since the beginning of our nation.

 

[iolo]

He should be, metaphorically, shot too.

Enough of these metaphorical discourses. Literal realism now!

 

[StoneByStone]

I think it’s a psuedo intellectual phrase, like toxic masculinity, that means nothing more than fashionable jargon.

You can call it whatever you want, some people call it "white guilt," but there is a clear self-hatred based on whiteness among white people in the West.

These are old fights and old arguments. This debate about the pluralistic nature of our country has been going on since the beginning of our nation.

This debate isn't about pluralism. It's about the question of why this one race hates itself.

 

[Mott the Hoople]

You can call it whatever you want, some people call it "white guilt," but there is a clear self-hatred based on whiteness among white people in the West.



This debate isn't about pluralism. It's about the question of why this one race hates itself.

You must have missed my sentence on gross exaggeration?

 

[StoneByStone]

You must have missed my sentence on gross exaggeration?

Did you watch the video? I don't think it's gross exaggeration to say that a very large amount of Whites are ethnomasochistic.

 

[PoliTalker]

Hello StoneByStone,

I think that's a good theory for why Whites try to make the world a better place, like the way we eliminated slavery all over the world. But it doesn't explain why we literally destroy our own countries for other races.

I don't think we've done that.

It doesn't explain why we see something as bad if it's "too white"

We see that as bad because it supports automatic privileges for being white instead of equal chance for all to flourish and succeed.

and fight to give ourselves systematic disadvantages.

I don't understand how the concept of equality is a disadvantage for anyone.

 

[PoliTalker]

Hello StoneByStone,

A few cases here and there like this are nothing compared to the endless stream of anti-white garbage in mainstream media.

Is it anti-white; or is it anti-discriminatory...

 

[PoliTalker]

Hello Mott,

Shooting aristocrats would be a good start. They may fit into capitalism but they are still kleptocrats and a burden on societ.

What a silly notion that the general population owes someone the wealth of their productivity, allegiance and loyalty due to an accident of birth.

Fortunately our revolution ended such primitive institutions as Monarchy, Royalty and Aristocracy.

Not really. Our new royalty is anointed by wealth acquisition and ego. Want to live in a castle? No problem. Just get a bunch of money and buy yourself one. Want to act like a king? No problem. Just throw some money at things in the right way and your decree will be the law of the land. Wealth is power. (Not to say that all wealthy choose to flex this power in this way. There are good capitalist kings and there are bad ones.)

 

[PoliTalker]

Hello Mott,

Racist!

No but seriously, the man is broadly traveled and makes some valid points but some of his points are gross exaggerations, others show a shocking ignorance of history and context.

Let’s give some examples of historical and cultural differences between the West and Asia that the video ignores.

Though these Asian Countries have modernized their cultures have not had the experience of a Reformation, a Renaissance, Enlightenment Revolutions or egalitarian rule.

Minorities have no rights in these Asian countries or damned few, where as Western Liberal Democracies, particularly the United States have enshrined minority rights in our Constitutional forms of government to prevent a tyranny of the majority.

This is an utterly alien concept in most, if not all, of Asia.

So in short there is nothing new here. This is a debate that began and had continued since the founding of modern liberal democracies based on Enlightenment values. We, in the West, have discovered great value in protecting minority rights and this is a huge difference between Asia and the West and has been for a long time.

I had to wonder, while watching the vid, if the 'Per capita income of Hong Kong' isn't heavily skewed upward from the median by the existence of a relatively few extremely wealthy individuals, and that the majority actually have very little. Don't people work in sweat shops there as they live stacked in horizontal lockers, barely more than a sleeping space? We do know that the 'per capita income' of the USA is definitely skewed by the existence of an extremely wealthy few, while many barely scrape by paycheck to paycheck, with the help of socialist taxpayer supported government assistance.

Yeah, Hong Kong has a high GDP, but what is the water quality of the waterways? Probably not a very good idea to swim in Kowloon Bay.

 

[PoliTalker]

Hello StoneByStone,

Things like the Renaissance and the Enlightenment explain why we demand that all human beings have rights. However, they don't explain why so many Whites demand discrimination and propaganda against Whites, especially in our own countries. I think it's completely possible to have minority rights without ethnomasochism. The two are not incompatible.

I don't think the white race is in any danger of being wiped out. And even if that were to happen one day very far into the future I don't see a problem with that. Don't most 'whites' actually have a mix of heritage, including DNA from many various races? Is allowing people the freedom to shack up with whomever they are attracted to, and to produce progeny at will 'ethnomasochism?'

 

[PoliTalker]

Hello StoneByStone,

You can call it whatever you want, some people call it "white guilt," but there is a clear self-hatred based on whiteness among white people in the West.

Don't most people actually have a bit of mixture of self-love and self-hatred? Isn't that really just part of being human?

This debate isn't about pluralism. It's about the question of why this one race hates itself.

Does it really do that any more than it loves itself?