Mueller speaks at 11 am today

TTQ64 said:
Apparently it's a legal concept based on a Justice Dept. interpretation that the only constitutional remedy for the removal of a president is through the Congressional process of impeachment. It seems to have no other legal footing than that. It is not in the Constitution.

Again, republican white men making up their own rules.

He should have indicted him.

He is giving dump a pass.
Click to expand...

its not his job to decide that


he did his job


now he needs to be asked a few questions about Barr and his actions


did he tell Mueller to wrap it up before Mueller could finish
 
Superfreak said:
THIS IS IT!
Click to expand...

There will never be an "IT", this will come down like the Iraq War came down... Slowly over time, until a tipping point happens, eventually you wont be able to find someone who claims they supported Swampy Don. In 8 years the Republican candidate will run against the behavior of Swampy, claiming they never supported him.
 
Gonzomin said:
It was not insufficient evidence. You rightys cannot get it right, even after Mueller clarified it. He essentially reiterated the conclusions in the report for you rightys who cannot understand it or are lying about it. He said he did not have the power to charge a sitting president due to department guidelines, which he followed'
He did push the House to do their job though. That job is investigating. The report says Congress can see that there are clear issues of obstruction that they should pursue, such as suborning perjury, intimidating witnesses and fabricating evidence. Read the damn report.
He said if they found Trump innocent, they would have said so. That too is in the report.
Click to expand...
STFU and impeach!
 
volsrock said:
does not mean guilty, no matter how many times you repeat it.

and IN THIS COUNTRY u are innocent till PROVEN GUILTY

SO YES HE IS INNOCENT
Click to expand...

Find where I said "guilty", illiterate fucktard.

Nowhere did the report say innocent. Do you not understand the difference between "insufficient evidence" and "innocent". If not, join the other couple of illiterate fucktards that don't.

"If we had confidence the President clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so. We did not." Does that say "innocent" to you, stupid fuck? If so, go bitch slap your English teachers for allowing an illiterate dumbfuck to pass.
 
It is only in the present that people who fall for Rumps shit do it, once history has had its clarifying effect, they deny it.
 
Jarod said:
There will never be an "IT", this will come down like the Iraq War came down... Slowly over time, until a tipping point happens, eventually you wont be able to find someone who claims they supported Swampy Don. In 8 years the Republican candidate will run against the behavior of Swampy, claiming they never supported him.
Click to expand...

You ever going to back up your claim? Or are you going to keep running from it?

Show us the part of the report that talks about 'plenty of collusion'
 
Superfreak said:
LMAO... "plenty of evidence of collusion"...yet the report specifically states that there is no evidence of collusion/coordination/conspiracy by ANY American.
Click to expand...

Nope, it sure didn't, illiterate moron. It said there was "insufficient evidence" to charge Trump's campaign with conspiracy. Not "no" evidence.

Illiterate shitstain
 
domer76 said:
Nope, it sure didn't, illiterate moron. It said there was "insufficient evidence" to charge Trump's campaign with conspiracy. Not "no" evidence.

Illiterate shitstain
Click to expand...

Candy is really hurting, lets be loving toward him, he needs it.
 
Gonzomin said:
It was not insufficient evidence. You rightys cannot get it right, even after Mueller clarified it. He essentially reiterated the conclusions in the report for you rightys who cannot understand it or are lying about it. He said he did not have the power to charge a sitting president due to department guidelines, which he followed'
He did push the House to do their job though. That job is investigating. The report says Congress can see that there are clear issues of obstruction that they should pursue, such as suborning perjury, intimidating witnesses and fabricating evidence. Read the damn report.
He said if they found Trump innocent, they would have said so. That too is in the report.
Click to expand...

You're not going to convince people that don't want to be convinced. As this thing ramps up and Congress begins to start the Impeachment process, we'll be able to watch the Righties spin, twirl, and holler in some kind of political Death Spiral. It'll be fun to watch, get the popcorn.

Try to remember who said what here. As more Republicans like Amash turn on Trump, the Righties here will start leaving the Trump Camp like Rats from a Sinking Ship.


"Amash gets standing ovation at first town hall after calling for Trump's impeachment"
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/...n-at-first-town-hall-after-calling-for-trumps
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top