Draft: Articles of Impeachment

LV426 said:
Fact is that you defend lawlessness and criminal behavior because that's what you engage in, isn't it?

That's what drew you to Trump in the first place, wasn't it?

Nothing to do with economic anxiety, it's that you instinctively knew you shared the same morality as Trump, so you could live vicariously through his success because you tasted no success of your own, on your own.
Click to expand...

Now you're attempting to be Iyanla Vanzant fix my life. I don't think there is an opening on her staff for you. Keep the 60 out of 435 house members inspired!
 
Southern Chicken said:
Here you go LV426.

https://chm.tbe.taleo.net/chm03/ats/careers/apply.jsp?org=OUTLOOKAMUSEMENTS&cws=1

good luck, I am supporting you.
Click to expand...

This is classic Conservative deflection.

This loser knows that ultimately, impeachment will mean he will have to defend Trump's criminal activity, and that's not something you're prepared to defend.

So it's a lose-lose scenario for you; you can posture, but in the end you're going to have to defend yourself, defending the illegal behavior and activity of Trump and the GOP.

I believe you can't successfully do that because you lack morality, intellect, experience, and the right temperament.

"Obstructing an investigation is OK because ______"
-You, once impeachment begins, probably.

Love the Conservative message for 2020: Vote for us because we defend people who break the law.
 
Jack said:
Yeah. You're the one that was born in Bavaria. I'm the one that was born in the USA.
(You do know you're on a 'List of Possible Russian Operatives in the US', right?)
Click to expand...

Yes; you are an embarrassment for the USA. You are also a testimony for how badly our liberal educational establishment has failed us.
 
LV426 said:
This is classic Conservative deflection.

This loser knows that ultimately, impeachment will mean he will have to defend Trump's criminal activity, and that's not something you're prepared to defend.

So it's a lose-lose scenario for you; you can posture, but in the end you're going to have to defend yourself, defending the illegal behavior and activity of Trump and the GOP.

I believe you can't successfully do that because you lack morality, intellect, experience, and the right temperament.

"Obstructing an investigation is OK because ______"
-You, once impeachment begins, probably.

Love the Conservative message for 2020: Vote for us because we defend people who break the law.
Click to expand...

Trump will never be removed from office by attempts to impeach him you sad, pathetic lying dunce.
 
Earl said:
In America, insufficent proof to pursue obstruction means that you are innocent.

The bedrock of American jurisprudence, innocent until proven guilty.
Click to expand...

I disagree Earl. It simply means there is insufficient evidence to support guilt. It does not mean you are innocent. People who are tried for a crime and win are not deemed innocent but Not Guilty. I know it basically means the same thing but you know how the law works.
 
Southern Chicken said:
Now you're attempting to be Iyanla Vanzant fix my life. I don't think there is an opening on her staff for you.
Click to expand...

Nah...what's really happening is that I figured you out (it wasn't that difficult, you people are all mostly motivated by the same thing), and you are trying to deflect and dodge away from your questionable character, instincts, and judgment.

You're finding yourself having to defend Trump's criminal activity and behavior; which isn't exactly a strong campaign theme heading into 2020, where the Senate is very much at stake too.
 
Quote Originally Posted by LV426 View Post
It's growing.

Conservatives are scared of impeachment because they know it will force them to defend the actions of Trump.
Click to expand...

you do realize we are already defending him, right?.......
 
LV426 said:
"Obstruction of Justice is OK because _______"
Click to expand...

Once again for the willful idiots on steroids:

NO ONE got fired. NO ONE destroyed evidence. NO ONE refused to cooperate. NO ONE shut down the investigation NO ONE chose not to release the entire report. NO ONE exercised executive privilege.

Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.

Barr: Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
you do realize we are already defending him, right?.......
Click to expand...

In a very narrow space you are...but impeachment proceedings will drag this all out to the general public because it will be unavoidable.

And then ultimately, it will have to be a part of your campaigns in 2020.

You're going to have to make defending criminal activity part of your campaign message.

Do you think that message will resonate with voters?
 
Grumpy said:
I disagree Earl. It simply means there is insufficient evidence to support guilt. It does not mean you are innocent.
Click to expand...

WRONG; you are PRESUMED innocent until PROVEN guilty. Liberals don't give a shit about the Constitution when it comes to their political opponents.

But you could not be MORE wrong. People who are charged with a crime and found NOT GUILTY are PRESUMED to remain innocent.

Yes, a jury of OJ's peers did not buy the prosecution and deemed OJ to be innocent and he will remain so until new evidence suggests otherwise. c
 
LV426 said:
Nah...what's really happening is that I figured you out (it wasn't that difficult, you people are all mostly motivated by the same thing), and you are trying to deflect and dodge away from your questionable character, instincts, and judgment.

You're finding yourself having to defend Trump's criminal activity and behavior; which isn't exactly a strong campaign theme heading into 2020, where the Senate is very much at stake too.
Click to expand...

Spoken like you're in your emotions not logic. Maybe you should have a talk show.
 
LV426 said:
In a very narrow space you are...but impeachment proceedings will drag this all out to the general public because it will be unavoidable.

And then ultimately, it will have to be a part of your campaigns in 2020.

You're going to have to make defending criminal activity part of your campaign message.

Do you think that message will resonate with voters?
Click to expand...

giphy.gif
 
LV426 said:
Yeah they will...they will have to defend Trump's actions or face his wrath.

That's the corner you painted yourself into when you decided to cast your vote for Trump because of how stupid and racist you are.
Click to expand...
quit talking :blah: and Impeach already..
do it now!
 
Truth Detector said:
WRONG; you are PRESUMED innocent until PROVEN guilty. Liberals don't give a shit about the Constitution when it comes to their political opponents.

But you could not be MORE wrong. People who are charged with a crime and found NOT GUILTY are PRESUMED to remain innocent.

Yes, a jury of OJ's peers did not buy the prosecution and deemed OJ to be innocent and he will remain so until new evidence suggests otherwise. c
Click to expand...

When you presume that means "that something is the case on the basis of probability." In layman's terms it simply says that you are probably innocent. That said can you show me one instance of a jury giving a verdict of the defendant is innocent? Every verdict I have ever seen or heard about the verdict was either guilty or not guilty.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top