Report; Climate apartheid - the rich will survive- you won't !

[CFM]

You didn't ask me anything. Ask away.

Already have. You acknowledged it then ran from it when you realized you lied about answering it.

 

[Into the Night]

OK- what is it in your sick mind that leads you to deny that the science of paleoclimatology exists ? It does exist, of course.

Define it.

Also , why are there global weather stations if there is- as you stupidly claim - no global weather ? Haw, haw..........haw.

Because no weather station can measure a global temperature or any other global parameter.

 

[Into the Night]

Already have. You acknowledged it then ran from it when you realized you lied about answering it.

You didn't ask me anything. Ask away. I can't answer a question you don't ask.

 

[CFM]

You didn't ask me anything. Ask away. I can't answer a question you don't ask.

You've already refused to answer one that was.

 

[Into the Night]

You've already refused to answer one that was.

Okay. I will assume you have no question to ask. You are just trolling.

 

[CFM]

Okay. I will assume you have no question to ask. You are just trolling.

I've asked it. You acknowledged that I did. I assume you can't provide what you say you can provide.

Your StoneByStone character is much more interesting. Have him come back for more abuse and embarrassment.

 

[moon]

Okay. I will assume you have no question to ask. You are just trolling.

You can talk- you drivel-dumping dope.

 

[Into the Night]

I've asked it. You acknowledged that I did. I assume you can't provide what you say you can provide.

Your StoneByStone character is much more interesting. Have him come back for more abuse and embarrassment.

Rest assured, I have no socks. I am usually arguing against the moron known as StoneByStone. I think you have me confused with someone else.

 

[Into the Night]

You can talk- you drivel-dumping dope.

Inversion fallacy.

 

[CFM]

Rest assured, I have no socks. I am usually arguing against the moron known as StoneByStone. I think you have me confused with someone else.

Yet you do.

 

[Into the Night]

Yet you do.

You definitely have me confused with someone else.

 

[CFM]

You definitely have me confused with someone else.

You're confused about yourself.

 

[Into the Night]

You're confused about yourself.

Try English. It works better.

 

[CFM]

Try English. It works better.

Try admitting the truth. It will make you feel better and be less embarrassed about what you do.

 

[Into the Night]

Try admitting the truth. It will make you feel better and be less embarrassed about what you do.

Void argument fallacy. What are you talking about? Are you ever going to ask that question you keep talking about?

 

[Taichiliberal]

Define 'severe winter'. Winter comes once a year, you know. Things like snow storms, sometimes heavy, strike different places in winter.

Hurricane frequency and intensity has not increased. See the National Hurricane Center data.

There is no database of tornadoes due to their short duration. Did you know that both hurricanes and tornadoes require COLD air to exist?

Could you be possibly a bit more vague about this? Void argument fallacy. Droughts happen.

Could you possibly be a bit more vague about this? Void argument fallacy. Floods happen.

No, you just pretend these events have something to do with this mysterious 'climate change' you can't define.

Lots of hurricanes wailed on the USA.

So you are describing 'climate change' as a bunch of gunmen?? WTF????

Science fiction has never become science fact, since science is not facts.
Science is a set of falsifiable theories.

Sure. He wrote some good stuff. None of it became any theory of science.

Define 'climate change'.

The 'conditions' you are describing are normal events.

Look genius, if you're going to waste time and space going point for point, try coming up with responses that are not incredibly ignorant of recent events or are childishly stubborn. Let me just quickly pull that chair out from under your BS: Your assignment is to read through this carefully and comprehensively....and spare us all the out of context quotes or right wing business flunkie myopia, as all can read and see your folly https://climate.nasa.gov/

As for the rest of your babbling....I suspect you haven't matured or been educated past 7th grade, or you like to pretend so. I mean, your guff about Jules Verne is pathetic...a primer for your education: https://interestingengineering.com/...les-verne-predicted-leagues-ahead-of-his-time

And stop playng dumber than you are regarding people's panic mode inhumanity in the face of natural disaster (this one borne of climate change and mismanagement) https://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-bridge-to-gretna/

Now if you've got nothing but dumb right wing troll blather as a response, I'll won't waste more time on you.

 

[Taichiliberal]

What 'increasing weather problems'? What preventive measures need to be taken over an undefined phrase? Define 'climate change'.

You're not a very good right wing troll, are ya bunky? I mean, no one can be this stupid or stubborn or …. wait, there's that orange faced guy in the White House. But just to watch your silly ass deny reality again:

https://climate.nasa.gov/
https://www.un.org/en/sections/issues-depth/climate-change/
https://www.ipcc.ch/

https://skepticalscience.com/global-warming-scientific-consensus-intermediate.htm

 

[Into the Night]

Look genius, if you're going to waste time and space going point for point,

I answer point by point because people are making multiple points.

try coming up with responses that are not incredibly ignorant of recent events

Void argument fallacy. Which events are you referring to?

or are childishly stubborn.

Inversion fallacy.

Let me just quickly pull that chair out from under your BS:

Theories of science are not BS. Neither is mathematics.

Your assignment is to read through this carefully and comprehensively....and spare us all the out of context quotes

All of the quotes I make are in context.

or right wing business flunkie myopia,

Science and mathematics is not anyone's flunkie myopia.

as all can read

Good. That makes them aware of these theories that are being ignored by the Church of Global Warming.

and see your folly

Science isn't folly. Neither is mathematics. Denying them like you do certainly is though.

https://climate.nasa.gov/

False authority fallacy. NASA is a government agency. They are not a theory of science.

As for the rest of your babbling....

Science isn't babbling. Neither is mathematics.

I suspect you haven't matured or been educated past 7th grade, or you like to pretend so.

YALIF.

I mean, your guff about Jules Verne is pathetic..

I like Jules Verne. When did I guff him?

a primer for your education: https://interestingengineering.com/...les-verne-predicted-leagues-ahead-of-his-time

None of it became science or any device we use today.

The trip to the Moon? We used a rocket, not a cannon.
20,000 leagues under the sea? The ocean isn't that deep, dumbass.
Journey to the center of the Earth? Know a way down there without melting yourself, dumbass?
Around the World in 80 days? He used existing technology.

And stop playng dumber than you are regarding people's panic mode inhumanity in the face of natural disaster

Don't panic. There is no natural disaster as you describe.

(this one borne of climate change and mismanagement)

Define 'climate change'. It is not possible to 'manage' climate. Terraforming is another piece of science fiction.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-bridge-to-gretna/

False authority fallacy. You can't use a news source as science.

Now if you've got nothing but dumb right wing troll blather as a response, I'll won't waste more time on you.

YALIF.

 

[Into the Night]

You're not a very good right wing troll, are ya bunky? I mean, no one can be this stupid or stubborn or …. wait, there's that orange faced guy in the White House. But just to watch your silly ass deny reality again:

https://climate.nasa.gov/
https://www.un.org/en/sections/issues-depth/climate-change/
https://www.ipcc.ch/

https://skepticalscience.com/global-warming-scientific-consensus-intermediate.htm

False authority fallacy. It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth, the global sea level, the global atmospheric content of CO2, the emissivity of Earth, or the total snow and ice content on Earth.
Science does not use consensus or supporting evidence. Science is a set of falsifiable theories. It only uses conflicting evidence.

So what is your favorite argument for the so-called 'greenhouse effect'? Do you like the Magick Blanket argument or the Magick Bouncing Photon argument?

 

[moon]

False authority fallacy. It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth, the global sea level, the global atmospheric content of CO2, the emissivity of Earth, or the total snow and ice content on Earth.
Science does not use consensus or supporting evidence. Science is a set of falsifiable theories. It only uses conflicting evidence.

Horseshit. You're an attention-crazed whacko. Fuck off.

So what is your favorite argument for the so-called 'greenhouse effect'? Do you like the Magick Blanket argument or the Magick Bouncing Photon argument?

Hmmmmmmm- let me see now- no, I think the von GobScheissen Rectology pronouncement should make a more useful addition to your poseurs' compendium .


Forget my previous instruction- stick around to get your fool head stomped further. Haw, haw.............haw.