When the Democrats Pass this Bailout

When the democrats pass this bailout will the resident lefty hacks r4espond by

  • Adopting a trickle down argument (i.e., we had to to bailout the rich to shield the masses)

    Votes: 5 45.5%
  • Claim they were duped into it

    Votes: 6 54.5%
  • Denounce the Democratic Party as the tool of oppression that it is

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    11
Both democrats and republicans have contributed to this corrupt system and both ward hard to supress 3rd party representation.

Totally in agreement with you there. We'll agree to disagree on the widespread vote fraud. I think the game is largely "fair" between the Republicans and Democrats, but their rules exclude everyone else from playing.
 
You mean, the thing that’s happened already 50 or more times in the past month Damo?

And yeah, I want con sexual violence policies to affect only cons. Live in your own shit, is my motto on that.

But do, please, address the first point, hack.
I did. I believe that people who use that word debase themselves. They only foul their own nest. Your turn.

Thank you for the trouble you take in actually trying to understand something I say rather than assuming some inane trifle portion of my post to be some direct insult, then projecting some inanity onto me. I'm not the one voting for somebody that says and does things I dislike because of party affiliation.
 
I did. I believe that people who use that word debase themselves. They only foul their own nest. Your turn.

Thank you for the trouble you take in actually trying to understand something I say rather than assuming some inane trifle portion of my post to be some direct insult, then projecting some inanity onto me. I'm not the one voting for somebody that says and does things I dislike because of party affiliation.

I've already admitted that they fouled their own nest...I just ask that they keep it there.
 
I've already admitted that they fouled their own nest...I just ask that they keep it there.


LOL... I used the word in jest because I know it irritates Waterhead. Your response is typical of Democrats, who seem to like to always go after the family. Of course, this 'fouling of the nest' doesn't bother you, since you tend to sleep wherever you end up.
 
LOL... I used the word in jest because I know it irritates Waterhead. Your response is typical of Democrats, who seem to like to always go after the family. Of course, this 'fouling of the nest' doesn't bother you, since you tend to sleep wherever you end up.

You called me a stupid cunt "in jest" "just to irritate Watermark"?

You're a fucking fool, and your daughter is a typical southern white trash whore.
 
...and of course, Damo's "theory" falls apart. But I didn't even think he had read that thread, so it's no surprise to me, just more hackery on Damo's part.

Just to reiterate to you Damo, republicans push anti-woman policies, and ferment an atmosphere of blaming the woman for rape, and I fervently hope they keep their own shit, to their own.

You want to spread it around, and I say, Thanks, But No Thanks. Not you specifically.
 
You called me a stupid cunt "in jest" "just to irritate Watermark"?

You're a fucking fool, and your daughter is a typical southern white trash whore.

LOL... Yep, did it just to irritate Waterhead, but irritating you is almost as enjoyable. You don't know my daughter, but your attacks on her are not surprising, it's typical for you to go after daughters you know nothing about. It's just the kind of low-life cunt you are.
 
Profile in Courage:

I think I am going to support Paulson's bailout, but I am going to wait and see what Bush and the Congress propose before I offer my solutions.

-- Barack Obambi


Leadership -- derived from the wind.
 
Profile in Courage:

I think I am going to support Paulson's bailout, but I am going to wait and see what Bush and the Congress propose before I offer my solutions.

-- Barack Obambi


Leadership -- derived from the wind.

Hmm if he really said that it is one of his dumber statements.
But then he is a politician.

the guy, actually either candidate Palin or Obama should have the balls to take a lead on this issue
 
This is some of the funniest shit ever.

Dixie, Tinfoil, Battleborne, and apparently half the Cons here wander around the board calling women cunts, bitches and whores.

And yet cons on the thread have the gall to question why women consider Cons and conservativism, hostile to women.
 
Yeah, and most of you were outspoken against the resolution that led us to war in Iraq. Did not stop you from apologizing for the Dems who supported it later.

You'd be wrong.

Why do you think Barack Obama won the nomination? I guaran-fucking-tee you, the main reason was Hillary's vote on the war.

Ever heard of Joe Lieberman? Democrats kicked his out out, and nominated Ned Lamont.


I cut slack to people who apologized for the war. Chuck Hagel. John Edwards. Dick Armey.

I fucking hate any war monger who never owned up the their support of the war.


I think the thing that pisses libs off, is the false equivalency Chimp apologists try to draw between themselves and Democrats. Superfreak and Damocles are always wandering around pleading with Democrats to share the blame equally for a Republican-inspired war, for a republican economy, and for a republican failed "war" on terrorism.

Sorry, not accepting 50% of the blame. The majority of democrats on capitol hill voted against the war authorization. Lieberman and Hillary got rejected because they voted for it. I don't see republicans holding a damn person accountable.

In fact, they still love their war.
 
They'll praise the democrats for making a hard choice to patch up the holes dug by the republicans. Democrats can do no wrong.

And republicans are praising Bush for making the hard choices necessary to react to the crisis brought about by democrats.

Partisans are partisans. They'll bend over, spread their cheeks wide, and take it up the tail pipe from their own party with big wide grins while blaming the burning and itching on the other party. Criticizing government as part of patriotism only applies to criticizing the opposing party. Criticism of your own party is no longer allowed - you either goose step in perfect time or get the fuck out of the way.
 
They'll praise the democrats for making a hard choice to patch up the holes dug by the republicans. Democrats can do no wrong.

And republicans are praising Bush for making the hard choices necessary to react to the crisis brought about by democrats.

Partisans are partisans. They'll bend over, spread their cheeks wide, and take it up the tail pipe from their own party with big wide grins while blaming the burning and itching on the other party. Criticizing government as part of patriotism only applies to criticizing the opposing party. Criticism of your own party is no longer allowed - you either goose step in perfect time or get the fuck out of the way.

Glad you finally understand Good Luck! Now get the fuck in line.
 
You'd be wrong.

Why do you think Barack Obama won the nomination? I guaran-fucking-tee you, the main reason was Hillary's vote on the war.

Ever heard of Joe Lieberman? Democrats kicked his out out, and nominated Ned Lamont.


I cut slack to people who apologized for the war. Chuck Hagel. John Edwards. Dick Armey.

I fucking hate any war monger who never owned up the their support of the war.


I think the thing that pisses libs off, is the false equivalency Chimp apologists try to draw between themselves and Democrats. Superfreak and Damocles are always wandering around pleading with Democrats to share the blame equally for a Republican-inspired war, for a republican economy, and for a republican failed "war" on terrorism.

Sorry, not accepting 50% of the blame. The majority of democrats on capitol hill voted against the war authorization. Lieberman and Hillary got rejected because they voted for it. I don't see republicans holding a damn person accountable.

In fact, they still love their war.

pwnage #2

same comment.....nice......
 
Back
Top