4 House members vote against lynching bill.

It isn't about usefulness. It's a symbolic move. Besides since people keep saying that there have not been a lynching in a long time, nothing changes. There still are many useless laws on the books.

Symbolism means nothing except to snowflakes.

So your answer is to add to it in order for people to have a warm fuzzy feeling inside?
 
It isn't about usefulness. It's a symbolic move. Besides since people keep saying that there have not been a lynching in a long time, nothing changes. There still are many useless laws on the books.

Aren't there far more important issues to worry about than passing racially divisive redundant legislation?
 
Can't answer huh?

The thread is about lynching. If you can't stay on topic, move along.

I was explaining to you what "hate crime" means. The title is, "FOUR LAWMAKERS VOTE AGAINST HOUSE BILL TO MAKE LYNCHING FEDERAL HATE CRIME".

Do you see the phrase, "hate crime", there?
 
I was explaining to you what "hate crime" means. The title is, "FOUR LAWMAKERS VOTE AGAINST HOUSE BILL TO MAKE LYNCHING FEDERAL HATE CRIME".

Do you see the phrase, "hate crime", there?

Why did you feel the need to do something which wasn't requested and isn't in line with the thread topic.

The thread title is 4 House members vote against LYNCHING BILL
 
Symbolism means nothing except to snowflakes.

So your answer is to add to it in order for people to have a warm fuzzy feeling inside?

No that isn't my answer. I was curious as to why it bothers you so much. It changes nothing. And you don't plan on lynching a black person. So why stress about it?

And it's hilarious that you talk about snowflakes when it's YOU who got bothered by this.
 
No that isn't my answer. I was curious as to why it bothers you so much. It changes nothing. And you don't plan on lynching a black person. So why stress about it?

And it's hilarious that you talk about snowflakes when it's YOU who got bothered by this.

Apparently no one was planning on it for over 30 years. I guess that's why something had to be done about it.

It's the snowflakes that thought doing this was necessary despite not a single lynching taking place since before many of them were born.
 
Why did you feel the need to do something which wasn't requested and isn't in line with the thread topic.

The thread title is 4 House members vote against LYNCHING BILL

If you would click on the link to the article, you'll see the title.

Now, your stupid question is dismissed. Now we can discuss about lynching.
 
Apparently no one was planning on it for over 30 years. I guess that's why something had to be done about it.

I don't believe in wasting time and this was a waste of time.

That's par for the course at Congress and the White House.
 
I can look at the thread title.

You've been dismissed you fucking nigger loving bastard. You've been put right where you belong. Looking up at your superiors.

You asked when was the last time somebody lynched a person because of their gender and/or sexual orientation when it's obvious that I was explaining to you what "hate crime" is in general.
 
You asked when was the last time somebody lynched a person because of their gender and/or sexual orientation when it's obvious that I was explaining to you what "hate crime" is in general.

No one asked you to explain or define a hate crime.
 
Didn't think a pussy like you would back up his demand of "move along".

Even you aren't stupid enough to step into my yard, boy.

Stop projecting what you do to nigger, son.

Go fuck one of your cousins you inbred dumbshit. Being a "pussy" would be an upgrade for a rimlicker like you.
 
Interesting that you admit blacks have to have things given to them.

The difference is I earned mine and the niggers and you wannabes expect others to give it to you.

Obviously, reading comprehension isn't your strong suit. Time to move along "sonny"....)
 
Back
Top