https://www.justice.gov/usao-edpa/p...s-charges-and-guilty-plea-former-philadelphia
well it looks like it does
You’re a fucking liar.
https://www.justice.gov/usao-edpa/p...s-charges-and-guilty-plea-former-philadelphia
well it looks like it does
Sure and the Commiefornia district that flipped back to red means nothing too right?
Keep thinking that puddin. It will make November that much more sweet.
You guys have no idea what is about to happen. Me and Leader Vlad have a lot planned for you


Never, ever, ever heard anyone say it "never" happens. Only that in study after study, and investigation after investigation, it is rare and insignificant.
Now, why don't you have an issue w/ the opposite: with Trump and some on Fox continuing to claim that it is widespread & very significant, with ABSOLUTELY ZERO PROOF? How's about that one? You're not partisan on this, are you...it's all about the facts, right?
Sure and the Commiefornia district that flipped back to red means nothing too right?
Keep thinking that puddin. It will make November that much more sweet.
You guys have no idea what is about to happen. Me and Leader Vlad have a lot planned for you


Well, with everything else going on, Democrats have mail in voting near the top of their to-do list, right before an election where they’re going to need all the help they can get to finally get rid of the Bad Orange Man, finally.
Why do you suppose that is?
And how do they plan on verifying who fills in these mail in ballots?
Who said that? Dems are not welded to hyperbole like rightys. We say that, many. many tests of the system show voter fraud is extremely rare. It is not a problem. Rightys who cannot understand that an incident does not prove a case are another problem.

I know EXACTLY why that is. It's the same reason Trump is already starting the campaign against mail-in.
He wins if less people vote. Period. How does that one sit w/ you?
Mail-in is the same as everything else. Show me where widespread fraud has been proven. Links, please.
How do they plan on verifying who fills in the mail in ballots?
No links?
I never claimed there was widespread cheating so why do I need a link?
So, how do they plan on verifying who fills out the mail in ballots?
Of course, of course. You never "claimed" it. You just implied it w/ the ol' "why do you suppose that is?" (wink, wink)
How do they verify them now? How do they verify Trump's?
Well, why do YOU suppose it is lol?
Democrats want to mail a bunch of ballots out and who knows where they’ll end up or who will fill them out.
Why is this such a pressing need anyway? I missed that part.
Oh, you missed it?
Here's a quick primer. We're in a pandemic, with a contagion that travels quickly. People don't want to spend hours in line waiting to vote, packed in w/ dozens of other people.
Pretty easy.
Milk that COVID for all it’s worth, eh lol?
Newsflash: lots of people have been standing in line for lots of things since March.
Standing in line to vote is just one more thing.
Sorry - I thought we are debating on the same planet.
What a lame dodge. I'll take the win.
Right lol.
Think about what you asked. You essentially asked, "Why in the world would anyone try to come up with alternatives to gathering large crowds of people for an extended period of time?"
I don't care that you're not taking COVID seriously. Millions of people are.
Still weak.
People have gotten used to standing in line and I don’t see why voting precincts have to be some sort of ‘special exception’ when they can employ the same measures virtually all businesses [well, those fortunate enough to be deemed ‘essential’] have used for months now.
But Democrats want to do a mail ballot dump to alleviate what would be a small risk, in the bigger picture.
Can hardly blame people for thinking they’re up to something.
It's not weak. It's 100% practical, and in tune w/ the current reality.
Seriously - take just a week off from Fox.