Climate predictions

You see guys, the plain fact is that we have no idea whether or not evolution is real or not. It's just invented by scientists to justify their anti-religious beliefs!
 
current.365.jpg

Wow - you mean it DECREASED during summer and INCREASED during winter? I would've totally expected global warming to stop that!
 
Wow - you mean it DECREASED during summer and INCREASED during winter? I would've totally expected global warming to stop that!

The red line is the anomaly from the average from 79-2000. The area of sea ice is about .5 million square miles under the average right now. I guess I really do have to walk you through this stuff.
 
you can see from the graph that we have swings over 10 times as great in sea ice area just between seasons. Being .5 million square miles short of ice is hardly a huge loss.
 
You see guys, the plain fact is that we have no idea whether or not evolution is real or not. It's just invented by scientists to justify their anti-religious beliefs!

I can't honestly say I can remember even a single scientist who is a climate sceptic, dispute evolution. Anyone else?
For one thing the theory of evolution is well over 100 years old and there need only be very simple evidence such as early homo habilus to australopithecus skulls and remains to prove it.

Climate change on the other hand involves far more variables, such as seasonal weather patterns, regional weather patterns, wind, dust, current, volcanos, the sun, cosmic rays...a lot of which are not yet fully understood before you even get to man's involvement.

Remember Watermark, that many on the left thought those on the right were sticking their heads in the sand when they dismissed outsourcing as not being a real problem and those lefties were wrong.

Climate alarmists were also wrong on global cooling in the 70's, leftist doomsdayers were wrong on the population bomb predictions of the 60's, acid rain in the 80's and the manmade CFCs being responsible for the reduction of the ozone layer in the antarctic.
They have pretty much been consistently wrong, wrong, wrong.
 
All I ask is that we all agree what the data says. I'm getting sick of things being blamed on global warming when we've seen the average global temp fall these last 2 years.

That's a fact!!


here's the NASA ocean surface temps
fig2b.gif
 
DOUBT DOUBT DOUBT DOUBT DOUBT DOUBT DOUBT DOUBT

No doubt that repeating the same word in all caps eight times is a proper substitution for an argument.

You see guys, the plain fact is that we have no idea whether or not evolution is real or not. It's just invented by scientists to justify their anti-religious beliefs!

There is far more evidence justifing the theory of evolution than the theory of global warming. Regardless, neither of them have been proven and the derision you are willing to give to anyone willing to express doubt in either theory only proves my assertion that uber environmentalists are very similar to fundamentalist Christians, Jews and Muslims.
 
No doubt that repeating the same word in all caps eight times is a proper substitution for an argument.



There is far more evidence justifing the theory of evolution than the theory of global warming. Regardless, neither of them have been proven and the derision you are willing to give to anyone willing to express doubt in either theory only proves my assertion that uber environmentalists are very similar to fundamentalist Christians, Jews and Muslims.

You guys are the goddamn fundamentalists. You probably still doubt fucking gravity, and you sit on your asses and murder your children, knowing full and well what's happening to the world, just using these lies as an excuse to save yourself some money, no matter what kills your children. You people have blood on your hands, and I'm glad you fanatics are no longer listened to in our government.
 
You guys are the goddamn fundamentalists. You probably still doubt fucking gravity, and you sit on your asses and murder your children, knowing full and well what's happening to the world, just using these lies as an excuse to save yourself some money, no matter what kills your children. You people have blood on your hands, and I'm glad you fanatics are no longer listened to in our government.

Holy shit you're delusional. You have a belief system similar to fundie christians.

Better fight the global warming just in case it's real because the consequences are too great to risk.

Absolutely silly logic. You can make up any threat and subscribe catastrophic consequences to it. In order to fear CO2 you have to have faith that it drives the climate. The evidence points elsewhere.

Enjoy your ignorance, watertard
 
Holy shit you're delusional. You have a belief system similar to fundie christians.

Better fight the global warming just in case it's real because the consequences are too great to risk.

Absolutely silly logic. You can make up any threat and subscribe catastrophic consequences to it. In order to fear CO2 you have to have faith that it drives the climate. The evidence points elsewhere.

Enjoy your ignorance, watertard

Say something enough and it becomes true.

You're arguments are EXACTLY like those of the intelligent designer crowd. Because you don't have EVIDENCE to back you up.
 
Tinfoil: Hey, the global warming guys always say that the worlds getting hotter, but I went outside today, and it wasn't that hot. Therefore, there's no such thing as global warming.
 
Say something enough and it becomes true.

You're arguments are EXACTLY like those of the intelligent designer crowd. Because you don't have EVIDENCE to back you up.

you choose to ignore the evidence.
Solar cycles and their correlation to climate are well documented. There is a video posted in the thread which links 6 different proxies to sun spot activity.
All the science is presented for debunking. Care to give it a shot? No? Oh I forgot for a moment. Your MO is to call name4s and ignore science while providing nothing to back up your position.

Like
I said before, enjoy your ignorance, little moron
 
you choose to ignore the evidence.
Solar cycles and their correlation to climate are well documented. There is a video posted in the thread which links 6 different proxies to sun spot activity.
All the science is presented for debunking. Care to give it a shot? No? Oh I forgot for a moment. Your MO is to call name4s and ignore science while providing nothing to back up your position.

Like
I said before, enjoy your ignorance, little moron

Man, you must copy all of your arguments down from denier sites like the Discovery institute, paraphrase the logic to fit global warming, and just regurgitate it to us.
 
I can't honestly say I can remember even a single scientist who is a climate sceptic, dispute evolution. Anyone else?
For one thing the theory of evolution is well over 100 years old and there need only be very simple evidence such as early homo habilus to australopithecus skulls and remains to prove it.

Climate change on the other hand involves far more variables, such as seasonal weather patterns, regional weather patterns, wind, dust, current, volcanos, the sun, cosmic rays...a lot of which are not yet fully understood before you even get to man's involvement.

Remember Watermark, that many on the left thought those on the right were sticking their heads in the sand when they dismissed outsourcing as not being a real problem and those lefties were wrong.

Climate alarmists were also wrong on global cooling in the 70's, leftist doomsdayers were wrong on the population bomb predictions of the 60's, acid rain in the 80's and the manmade CFCs being responsible for the reduction of the ozone layer in the antarctic.
They have pretty much been consistently wrong, wrong, wrong.

hmmm, cfcs (a catalytic agent) that reduces ozone do not?
as for malthus, i do not think it is soon enough to laugh at him
 
Man, you must copy all of your arguments down from denier sites like the Discovery institute, paraphrase the logic to fit global warming, and just regurgitate it to us.

You must be a retard who can't even follow the science because everything I've posted is linked to reputable sources like NASA GISS and Hadley Climate Reasearch unit.

You're a fucking little asshole punk who doesn't even have the brains to comprehend the science let alone know what's been proven or not. Go wax your lance you poser
 
You must be a retard who can't even follow the science because everything I've posted is linked to reputable sources like NASA GISS and Hadley Climate Reasearch unit.

You're a fucking little asshole punk who doesn't even have the brains to comprehend the science let alone know what's been proven or not. Go wax your lance you poser

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knickerbockers

180px-SirPendleton.jpg

This man is wearing German knickerbockers.


Knickerbockers were a men's or boys' baggy knee trousers particularly popular in the early twentieth century. Golfers' plus twos and plus fours were trousers of this type. Before World War II, skiers often wore knickerbockers too, usually ankle-length.

Until after World War II, in many anglophone countries, boys customarily wore short pants in summer and knickerbockers or "knickers" (or "knee pants") in winter. At the onset of puberty, they graduated to long trousers. In that era, the transition to "long pants" was a major rite of passage. See, for example, the classic song Blues in the Night by Johnny Mercer: "My mammy done told me, when I was in knee-pants, my mammy done told me, son..."

Baseball players wear a stylized form of knickerbockers, although the pants have become snugger in recent decades and some modern ballplayers opt to pull the trousers close to the ankles.
 
Back
Top