Harlem Globetrotters in War on Terror!

When I have pinheads claiming "pwnage" I can rest assured I have made my point, and struck a major nerve in the process... ib1's leg is probably twitching right now!

alQaeda is a shell of the organization it was, they have not been able to launch a major terror attack against us since 9/11, and it's not because they don't want to. It's because of things like the Rendition Program (which incidentally, Panetta was okay with as Chief of Staff under Clinton), it's because we have been able to thwart their plans due to warrantless wiretaps, and capture the bad guys before they could do us harm. (something else Panetta had no problem with under Clinton). It's because we have been able to incarcerate masterminds like Khalid Sheikh Mohammed at Gitmo, and keep them off the streets. These policies will surely change under a liberal left-wing ACLU-minded administration, who wants to make sure everyone is on a level playing field, including our enemies. BUT.... It will make for a much more interesting GAME! That's what matters to us! We must be entertained! We must have competition! It's "my guy" against "your guy" it's the mean old US against the poor little underdogs... the alQaeda Shamrocks vs. the US Globetrotters!
 
When I have pinheads claiming "pwnage" I can rest assured I have made my point, and struck a major nerve in the process... ib1's leg is probably twitching right now!

alQaeda is a shell of the organization it was, they have not been able to launch a major terror attack against us since 9/11, and it's not because they don't want to. It's because of things like the Rendition Program (which incidentally, Panetta was okay with as Chief of Staff under Clinton), it's because we have been able to thwart their plans due to warrantless wiretaps, and capture the bad guys before they could do us harm. (something else Panetta had no problem with under Clinton). It's because we have been able to incarcerate masterminds like Khalid Sheikh Mohammed at Gitmo, and keep them off the streets. These policies will surely change under a liberal left-wing ACLU-minded administration, who wants to make sure everyone is on a level playing field, including our enemies. BUT.... It will make for a much more interesting GAME! That's what matters to us! We must be entertained! We must have competition! It's "my guy" against "your guy" it's the mean old US against the poor little underdogs... the alQaeda Shamrocks vs. the US Globetrotters!


please tell us the source of your inside knowledge as to the rationale and motivation of Al Qaeda regarding their strategy for attacking us?

I would suggest that AQ attacked us hoping for a very specific response... and Goerge Bush did PRECISELY what they hoped and prayed he would do... he invaded, conquered and occupied an oil rich arab nation and sent 150K Americans into the middle east where AQ could kill them with relative ease and not have to plan major incursions into the west to do so... they didn't need to plan and execute plane hijackings half way around the world... they could kill Americans at will by merely wrapping a goat carcass around an IED and putting it on the curb in an area where WE were the enemy and not them.
 
Dixie, you have done nothing in this thread except make a bigger fool of yourself than usual.

Your gamer analogy is silly. The entertainment angle is ridiculous. And your claims are bogus.
 
please tell us the source of your inside knowledge as to the rationale and motivation of Al Qaeda regarding their strategy for attacking us?

I would suggest that AQ attacked us hoping for a very specific response... and Goerge Bush did PRECISELY what they hoped and prayed he would do... he invaded, conquered and occupied an oil rich arab nation and sent 150K Americans into the middle east where AQ could kill them with relative ease and not have to plan major incursions into the west to do so... they didn't need to plan and execute plane hijackings half way around the world... they could kill Americans at will by merely wrapping a goat carcass around an IED and putting it on the curb in an area where WE were the enemy and not them.

you're kidding...so because AQ wanted bush to invade...and bush did...AQ wins....

pathetic

i am sure if AQ attacked your hometown with the purpose of gettign you to RETALIATE you would say...hey folks, they only attacked me to so that i would retaliate/threaten them that they had better defend their home/family against my very best...that we should do NOTHING.

well, i guess you can't tell them to defend against your very best as that is what AQ wants.

logic has never been your strong point. :pke:
 
Ok, I got curious.

Panetta....

Born in 1938

Got his BA and his law degree and served as editor of the Law Review before joining the military in 1964 at the age of 26

Got out of the military in 1966 after receiving a commendation medal

Was legislative ass't to the Senate Minority Whip.

Was special ass't to the Secretary of Health Education & Welfare

Was Director of the U.S. Office for Civil Rights.

Went to NY and was the executive ass't to the mayor, overseeing the city's relations with the state and federal gov't.

In 1971 he returned to Monterey and practiced law at the firm Panetta, Thompson, and Panetta.

US Representative from CA's 17th district from 1977 to 1993.

From 1989 to 1993, Panetta was chairman of the House Committee on the Budget. He also served as a member of that committee from 1979 to 1985. He chaired the House Agriculture Committee’s Subcommittee on Domestic Marketing, Consumer Relations and Nutrition; the House Administration Committee’s Subcommittee on Personnel and Police; and the Select Committee on Hunger’s Task Force on Domestic Hunger. He also served as vice chairman of the Caucus of Vietnam Era Veterans in Congress and as a member of the President’s Commission on Foreign Language and International Studies.

Panetta left Congress in 1993, at the beginning of his ninth term, to become Director of the Office of Management and Budget for the incoming Clinton administration. In that position, he was instrumental in developing the 1993 budget package that is widely credited with achieving a balanced federal budget and eventual budget surpluses.

Panetta was appointed Chief of Staff to President Clinton on July 17, 1994, and served in that position until January 20, 1997. He was the principal negotiator of the successful 1996 budget compromise, and was widely praised for bringing order and focus to White House operations and policy making.

Panetta currently co-directs with his wife Sylvia the Leon & Sylvia Panetta Institute for Public Policy, based at California State University, Monterey Bay – a university he helped establish on the site of the former U.S. Army base, Fort Ord. The Institute serves as a nonpartisan, not-for-profit study center for the advancement public policy, seeking in particular to attract thoughtful men and women to lives of public service.

In addition, Mr. Panetta serves as Distinguished Scholar to the Chancellor of the California State University system. He advises the Chancellor on national issues affecting higher education and teaches a Master’s course in Public Policy at the Panetta Institute.
In 1997, he was also appointed Presidential Professor at Santa Clara University, teaching a course called Studies in Public Policy

Mr. Panetta has served as a leader in numerous community and national public policy organizations throughout his career. In March 2006, he was chosen to serve on the Iraq Study Group, a bi-partisan committee established at the urging of Congress and organized by the U.S. Institute of Peace, the Center for Strategic and International Studies, the Center for the Study of the Presidency and the James A. Baker III Institute. Since 2005, he has served as member of the Independent Task Force on Immigration and America’s Future. In November 2004, Governor Schwarzenegger appointed him co-chair of the Council on Base Support and Retention.

Mr. Panetta served a six-year term on the Board of Directors of the New York Stock Exchange beginning in 1997. He was chairman of the Committee for Review for the New York Stock Exchange Board of Directors and was co-chair of the Corporate Governance and Listing Standards Committee for the Stock Exchange.

He served on the National Review Board of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, the board of the National Steinbeck Center, and the University of California Santa Cruz Foundation, and since June 1998, he has served on the board of the Santa Clara University Law School Board of Visitors. He also serves as a member of the Board of Trustees for Santa Clara University; as a member of the Fleishman-Hillard International Advisory Board; as a trustee for the Community Hospital of the Monterey Peninsula; and as a director for the Monterey Bay Aquarium. He is chairman of the National Board of Advisors of the Center for National Policy as well as chairman of the Pew Oceans Commission. He is also a member of the Board of Directors for Blue Shield of California; IDT; Zenith; Connetics; the National Marine Sanctuary Foundation; Bread for the World; and Close Up. He lectures nationally and internationally on the state of the economy, the federal budget and other issues facing our nation, and is the recipient of awards and honors too numerous to list.





So he taught one course, after having done all that. And you are calling him a school teacher?

He has been the white house chief of staff, a us representative, and on the board of directors of the NY Stock Exchange. And you want to call him a teacher?
There is almost a seed of truth, so its not an outright lie, but its about as misleading as you can get.
Funny after this Dixie never even referred back to it.
 
you're kidding...so because AQ wanted bush to invade...and bush did...AQ wins....

pathetic

i am sure if AQ attacked your hometown with the purpose of gettign you to RETALIATE you would say...hey folks, they only attacked me to so that i would retaliate/threaten them that they had better defend their home/family against my very best...that we should do NOTHING.

well, i guess you can't tell them to defend against your very best as that is what AQ wants.

logic has never been your strong point. :pke:


I just love the "we had to do something!" justification for Iraq, as though the only options were invade Iraq, or do nothing.
 
"ib1's leg is probably twitching right now!"

Dix, I gots a hunch that your leg has been twitching since election day, and you probably have one of those pronounced facial ticks, as well.

We won, you lost. How's it feel, Dix? I'll tell ya, where I'm sitting, it feels friggin' great.
 
I just love the "we had to do something!" justification for Iraq, as though the only options were invade Iraq, or do nothing.
exactly.... yurt stumbles over anything beyond simple ambulance chasing... no one said that AQ attacked us so that we would retaliate against THEM... THEY are a stateless entity. They attacked us so that we would attack the Islamic world... and we did. Advancing radical extremist islamic philosophy requires motivating the masses of Islam to rise up and overthrow the western puppets that subjegate them. Our invasion of Iraq threatens the status quo of every secular arab regime and inflamed the arab street across the region. It was, without doubt, the single most counterproductive foreign policy initiative in our history.
 
exactly.... yurt stumbles over anything beyond simple ambulance chasing... no one said that AQ attacked us so that we would retaliate against THEM... THEY are a stateless entity. They attacked us so that we would attack the Islamic world... and we did. Advancing radical extremist islamic philosophy requires motivating the masses of Islam to rise up and overthrow the western puppets that subjegate them. Our invasion of Iraq threatens the status quo of every secular arab regime and inflamed the arab street across the region. It was, without doubt, the single most counterproductive foreign policy initiative in our history.

you're such a intellectual coward....you can't debate my post...so you cowardly resort to insulting me in a post to another....

no wonder you are not respected on any board you belong to
 
exactly.... yurt stumbles over anything beyond simple ambulance chasing... no one said that AQ attacked us so that we would retaliate against THEM... THEY are a stateless entity. They attacked us so that we would attack the Islamic world... and we did. Advancing radical extremist islamic philosophy requires motivating the masses of Islam to rise up and overthrow the western puppets that subjegate them. Our invasion of Iraq threatens the status quo of every secular arab regime and inflamed the arab street across the region. It was, without doubt, the single most counterproductive foreign policy initiative in our history.

Yep; 9/11 was a one shot deal for OBL. It took years & a stroke of luck for him to pull it off, and it's all he had up his sleeve.

Bush played right into his hands. He couldn't have hoped for a better reaction from the U.S.
 
Yep; 9/11 was a one shot deal for OBL. It took years & a stroke of luck for him to pull it off, and it's all he had up his sleeve.

Bush played right into his hands. He couldn't have hoped for a better reaction from the U.S.


he needed a moron like Dubya for him to be able to pull it off, however. And the fact that Team Dubya was totally focused on star wars and porn made his 9/11 escapade a cakewalk for him.
 
exactly.... yurt stumbles over anything beyond simple ambulance chasing... no one said that AQ attacked us so that we would retaliate against THEM... THEY are a stateless entity. They attacked us so that we would attack the Islamic world... and we did. Advancing radical extremist islamic philosophy requires motivating the masses of Islam to rise up and overthrow the western puppets that subjegate them. Our invasion of Iraq threatens the status quo of every secular arab regime and inflamed the arab street across the region. It was, without doubt, the single most counterproductive foreign policy initiative in our history.

LMAO.... So they attacked us knowing full well that Bush would turn around and attack a country that had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11 and without any justification or reason to wage such a war? I'll turn the tables around here and ask you where you gain your insight into what alQaeda thought? Because the "logic" you seem to be deducing here, is contrary to everything you and the rest of the pinhead nation has had to say about Iraq. Your "logic" concludes that Bush had no reason to invade Iraq, and it was the most stupid thing in the whole wide world for him to have done... yet alQaeda knew (and predicted) he would do that if they attacked us! That's pretty fucking amazing, if you ask me! That alQaeda just naturally assumed Bush would react in a way that totally defied any logic or reason!

The Arab street was not inflamed across the region! In fact, most of them applauded our capture of Saddam Hussein, and were thankful he was overthrown. While Syria and Iran certainly sent their share of radical Islamic terrorists into Iraq to disrupt the establishment of democracy, neither of them took up arms as a nation and came marching into Iraq to fight us, did they? No other nation did that either, so apparently, the "inflammation" is confined to your jockey shorts on that one.
 
Dixie, you have done nothing in this thread except make a bigger fool of yourself than usual.

Your gamer analogy is silly. The entertainment angle is ridiculous. And your claims are bogus.

Frankly, I care more about the corn on the side of my big toe, than what you think, Sol. Nothing I have said is bogus or ridiculous, it is spot on. The fact that you are a moron who likes to drink koolaid and pretend you are smart, doesn't really matter here, you need to go find a thread by Onzie or Ib1, and stroke your ego there.
 
"ib1's leg is probably twitching right now!"

Dix, I gots a hunch that your leg has been twitching since election day, and you probably have one of those pronounced facial ticks, as well.

We won, you lost. How's it feel, Dix? I'll tell ya, where I'm sitting, it feels friggin' great.

Aww... Onziez... I know it feels great! It's just like when you finally made it to the next level of Mortal Combat! I fully understand how great you feel, and I am happy for you! Now, if "your guy" can just power up and beat the two-headed cyclops, and obtain the golden goblet.... WOWZER! That will be really cool!
 
LMAO.... So they attacked us knowing full well that Bush would turn around and attack a country that had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11 and without any justification or reason to wage such a war? I'll turn the tables around here and ask you where you gain your insight into what alQaeda thought? Because the "logic" you seem to be deducing here, is contrary to everything you and the rest of the pinhead nation has had to say about Iraq. Your "logic" concludes that Bush had no reason to invade Iraq, and it was the most stupid thing in the whole wide world for him to have done... yet alQaeda knew (and predicted) he would do that if they attacked us! That's pretty fucking amazing, if you ask me! That alQaeda just naturally assumed Bush would react in a way that totally defied any logic or reason!

The Arab street was not inflamed across the region! In fact, most of them applauded our capture of Saddam Hussein, and were thankful he was overthrown. While Syria and Iran certainly sent their share of radical Islamic terrorists into Iraq to disrupt the establishment of democracy, neither of them took up arms as a nation and came marching into Iraq to fight us, did they? No other nation did that either, so apparently, the "inflammation" is confined to your jockey shorts on that one.


Bin Laden's stated goal was to bankrupt America. How's he doin' so far?

You're so stupid. You shouldn't ever be allowed in a discussion about national security.
 
"Nothing I have said is bogus or ridiculous, it is spot on."

Here's a hint, Dix - when you have to say that about yourself, it's probably not true.

You haven't been right about anything, for years. Not a thing.
 
Last night on one of the talking head shows, they had a talking head on talking about the elections in Palestine territory. He said that the Bush administration had made the mistake of equating elections with democracy. His comment was you did not laud the election of a party that has it's own militia. In true democracies, parties don't have militias. Hamas really is a militia with a political arm. The same can be said of Iraq. many of their parties have the backing of Militias. When you have an armed police force, like say, the brown shirts, you really can't make a claim that you are a legitimate party engaged in the democratic system.
 
Last night on one of the talking head shows, they had a talking head on talking about the elections in Palestine territory. He said that the Bush administration had made the mistake of equating elections with democracy. His comment was you did not laud the election of a party that has it's own militia. In true democracies, parties don't have militias. Hamas really is a militia with a political arm. The same can be said of Iraq. many of their parties have the backing of Militias. When you have an armed police force, like say, the brown shirts, you really can't make a claim that you are a legitimate party engaged in the democratic system.

that is why we have the second amendment...
 
Back
Top