Ny Senate Seat News

Okay, what's w/ the new avatar...is that you?

And what's the scoop w/ Gillibrand? All I know is that she was in one of the ugliest campaigns I've seen w/ Sandy Treadwell this past fall...

Yes that is me, but I won't leave it up, I am just playing around tonight. I don't want some freaks doctoring it, like you know who did to Ib's?

You know Onceler, I didn't know about that campaign at all, I have to look that up. I really didn't know her, but I googled her for a while, and it seems the general consensous is that she is a blue dog. Which we dont' need another one of them, in my view.
 
See, it is taking SF so long to respond because he is totally staring at my t*ts. I have to delete that.

Actually I was reading a piece by an insecure woman who thinks that if men protect the life of an unborn child, somehow that translates to hating women.
 
Ah yes, your 'u a sexist' line of defense. You bitch and moan about people demeaning women for expressing their own views or standing up for what they believe in. You call men sexists who attempt to do exactly what you just did to that Representative. You attempt to belittle her because to you she is not a 'real' woman. It is that type of insecure bullshit that defeats any legitimate complaints you have about sexism.

Then when called out for it, you claim the woman is a 'con' and thus its ok for you to demean her. One day I hope you overcome your insecurities and realize that 'real women' come in many different shapes and sizes, they have the ability to think for themselves and possess the ability to have differing opinions from one another.

I have a low opinion of all conservatives, gender is not relevant, and you constantly demean liberal men, so what does that say about you? Let me guess, something different?

That is sexism. Purely.
 
Yes that is me, but I won't leave it up, I am just playing around tonight. I don't want some freaks doctoring it, like you know who did to Ib's?

You know Onceler, I didn't know about that campaign at all, I have to look that up. I really didn't know her, but I googled her for a while, and it seems the general consensous is that she is a blue dog. Which we dont' need another one of them, in my view.

I think that's almost exactly how I pictured you (as much as I can see, anyway - bad eyes after decades in front of a computer). Very smokin' - hope Dixie isn't reading this. And yeah - definitely don't leave it up. I remember that ib doctoring, which was really weird & somewhat perverse, in a way.

We were really rooting for Gillibrand; not just because she's a Dem, but because Treadwell's ads were so awful & negative. So my impression is kind of colored by that. Honestly, though, I know very little about her positions...
 
I think that's almost exactly how I pictured you (as much as I can see, anyway - bad eyes after decades in front of a computer). Very smokin' - hope Dixie isn't reading this. And yeah - definitely don't leave it up. I remember that ib doctoring, which was really weird & somewhat perverse, in a way.

We were really rooting for Gillibrand; not just because she's a Dem, but because Treadwell's ads were so awful & negative. So my impression is kind of colored by that. Honestly, though, I know very little about her positions...

Hmm, that's interesting, I'll definitely look up the race.

Yeah, I'll take it down now. Thanks though. :)
 
I have a low opinion of all conservatives, gender is not relevant, and you constantly demean liberal men, so what does that say about you? Let me guess, something different?

That is sexism. Purely.

It is not sexist to point out YOUR hypocricy.

Now show me where I have done the same.... yes, I mock liberal men. But I don't bitch about it when others also mock them.
 
Well I at least assume that a Democratic woman, elected in NY state is going to be a liberal. I didn't know he was going to go trolling throught the upstate trailer parks for this. I'd rather he appoint a republican...in two years, they'd be O.U.T.

Now we'll be saddled with a fucking conservative ny state senator. This is the worst possible outcome.

Maybe she'll lose the primaries?

Or maybe he'll pick Cuomo after all. Which would you rather have?
 
Oh Lord, SF must really be preparing some huge anti-choice rant. I think I am going to bed"! I have aggravated enough conservatives for one night anyway. I almost feel like, I should have a smoking gun I can blow on the end of after I'm done with them. They're so easy and predictable! Puppets, really.
 
Maybe she'll lose the primaries?

Or maybe he'll pick Cuomo after all. Which would you rather have?

I don't know. I dislike Cuomo because he strikes me as such a rat. I'll have to do more research into her. But a primary challenge is an interesting thought, you never know what could happen.
 
It is not sexist to point out YOUR hypocricy.

Now show me where I have done the same.... yes, I mock liberal men. But I don't bitch about it when others also mock them.

I don't bitch about it when others mock conservative women, so what is your point?
 
Yes that is me, but I won't leave it up, I am just playing around tonight. I don't want some freaks doctoring it, like you know who did to Ib's?

You know Onceler, I didn't know about that campaign at all, I have to look that up. I really didn't know her, but I googled her for a while, and it seems the general consensous is that she is a blue dog. Which we dont' need another one of them, in my view.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirsten_Gillibrand#Issues_and_positions

Good God.

I've decided to use Dano's brilliant method of going through a random think tanks ranking list and picking the most liberal one from New York. So, Patterson should appoint Velázquez, Nydia.

http://progressivepunch.org/members.jsp?member=NY12
 
Last edited:
Alright I looked at her wikipedia and she's removed her name from consideration.

How about:

Jerrold Nadler (second after Nydia)
or maybe
Louise Slaughter (quite a bit down, but the second most liberal woman on the list)
 
Oh Lord, SF must really be preparing some huge pro-life rant. I think I am going to bed"! I have aggravated enough conservatives for one night anyway. I almost feel like, I should have a smoking gun I can blow on the end of after I'm done with them. They're so easy and predictable! Puppets, really.

LMAO... you ask that I don't discuss this issue with you and then you attempt to get me to comment on your need to support the murders of innocent children?
 
I applaud Patterson's choice to replace Clinton.

She's been endorsed by the NRA and her stances on gays, even gays in the military, are out of step with NY. She's basically a Republican.

It was a bad choice. She'll probably be challenged from the left in two years in a primary battle, probably by Maloney.

Hopefully a challange from the left can get rolling and be well-funded, because she can only be taken out in the primaries, not the general.

And I strongly object to New York having a Republican Senator.
 
She's been endorsed by the NRA and her stances on gays, even gays in the military, are out of step with NY. She's basically a Republican.

It was a bad choice. She'll probably be challenged from the left in two years in a primary battle, probably by Maloney.

Hopefully a challange from the left can get rolling and be well-funded, because she can only be taken out in the primaries, not the general.

And I strongly object to New York having a Republican Senator.

This is news to me.

Why then would Patterson appoint her?

Didn't Clinton applaud this appointment?
 
Back
Top