Biden to eliminate oil and gas by 2035

Maybe you need a nap.

You're projecting. :D

61rkDb8m0OL._AC_SL1200_.jpg
 
iu


If you want to refer to say, something in the Constitution of the United States, you can certainly use that document as a source.
If you want to refer to a theory of science, you can certainly use the creator of that theory as a source.
If you want to define a word, then define it...yourself. Dictionaries do not define any word.
If you want to refer to what a politician said, you can refer to that politician, or his web site, not to any news source or any youtube video.

tenor.gif
 
Yet he is trying to improve his immediate environment, by seeking a better place to sleep.

Environmentalism is typically just membership in the Church of Green. These people do not care about anything but themselves.

Only a right winger is so incompetent as to think the left only thinks of themselves when it is the right that seeks to take away benifits for the poor while increasing the deficit by trillions to give to the 1%.

Now, seeking to "improve" the slight space one takes up sleeping by moving under a bridge to get out of the rain has NOTHING to do with changing the environment, not even that tiny space the homeless occupy.
 
They pump on some nasty chemicals. However, they do not have to reveal what's in them.https://www.nrdc.org/stories/fracki...ethylene,considered hazardous to human health.

False authority fallacy. Democrat propaganda sites are not a valid authority. Methanol is wood alcohol. You can buy it in the drugstore as 'rubbing alcohol'. Ethylene is often polymerized to become polyethylene, used to carry your food home from the grocery store, to make plastic bottles for your drinks, medical uses such as hoses and disposable equipment, and other uses. It's not toxic. It's quite benign. Rubbing alcohol is toxic to ingest, but external uses are completely fine, including cleaning and disinfecting, even if eating and food preparation areas.

These chemicals aren't nasty. You use them every day. They are used in small amounts in fracking from time to time to lubricate the equipment. The basic components of fracking is sand and water. Nothing wrong with them.

Denial of chemistry. Fear mongering.
 
Would that not render my arguments susceptible to rejection due to a lack of supporting evidence, Your Majesty?

If you can't make an argument without using Holy Links, you can't make an argument. Learn to think for yourself. You must present your own reasoning.
 
They pump on some nasty chemicals. However, they do not have to reveal what's in them.https://www.nrdc.org/stories/fracki...ethylene,considered hazardous to human health.

You chose an environmentalist site with an agenda. Hardly unbiased, but that aside, it's also non-specific in its description of fracking. Here's a pictorial version of what goes into fracking liquids which are 80% to 90%+ water.

about_hydraulic_fracturing_chemicals_new.jpg


Here's a list that shows the proportions of a typical fracking mix:

Untitled.png




Where most problems occur with fracking is where it's done in shallower deposits of softer stone. Deeper fracking has less problems associated with it.
 
Only a right winger is so incompetent as to think the left only thinks of themselves when it is the right that seeks to take away benifits for the poor while increasing the deficit by trillions to give to the 1%.
Bigotry. You don't get to speak for all conservatives or all liberals. You only get to speak for yourself.

Define 'benefit for the poor'. Please describe specifically what you think Trump or any other conservative (by name) has done to deny 'benefits for the poor'.
Please describe in detail these welfare payments the top 1% of earners receive.

Only the House has the power of the purse. They are the only ones that can spend money the government doesn't have. Who's controlling the House right now? Democrats.
Now, seeking to "improve" the slight space one takes up sleeping by moving under a bridge to get out of the rain has NOTHING to do with changing the environment, not even that tiny space the homeless occupy.
So you think the open street is the same environment as shelter under an overpass?
 
Back
Top