SCOTUS GIVES GA, MI, WI, AND PA UNTIL THURSDAY DEC 10 AT 3PM TO RESPOND TO SUIT

“The Constitution simply states that "The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations" (Article I, section 4).”
www.senate,gov

The courts illegally changed "The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives."
(Article I, section 4).

maybe if they get reminded of this another 250 times it will finally sink in.......
 
Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause. It establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally, take precedence over state laws, and even state constitutions.

Illegal drug use and sales are still illegal per federal law.
 
Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause. It establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally, take precedence over state laws, and even state constitutions.

Illegal drug use and sales are still illegal per federal law.

They take precedence on the same issues. For example, there is no federal statute governing voting procedures in Pennsylvania. Moreover, The Constitution leaves voting procedures in the states up to the governments of those states.
 
please stop lying about what is happening.......you stupid cunt......

I'm not. I'm sorry that you are galactically fucking stupid, but what I said is absolutely correct. The lawsuit asks for every single vote in those four states to be thrown out. Why don't you try reading something, you fucking twit.
 
Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause. It establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally, take precedence over state laws, and even state constitutions.

Illegal drug use and sales are still illegal per federal law.

LOL at you. You are completely wrong. They do NOT take precedence unless the law in the state is deemed unconstitutional. It is absolutely 100% within the rights of a state to legalize marijuana. What it means is that the state will allow the use of marijuana per it's statute. The US government can do absolutely nothing to overturn that law. NOTHING.
 
and alleges correctly....a state's executive branch or judicial branch cannot change the election rules set by a state's legislative branch.......Bush v Gore decided that WAS unconstitutional.......anything that is thrown out will not be a vote.......and seriously, you know absolutely nothing about the law......stop pretending you do and stfu........



you should have thought about that before you started messing around with the rules of the election........its not like you weren't warned........

Once again, read the fucking lawsuit you fucking imbecile. Seriously. It's like teaching a five year old. The lawsuit alleges that the STATE LAW ITSELF is unconstitutional. The one that was PASSED BY THE LEGISLATURE Jesus Christ, how are you all so fucking stupid.
 
LOL at you. You are completely wrong. They do NOT take precedence unless the law in the state is deemed unconstitutional. It is absolutely 100% within the rights of a state to legalize marijuana. What it means is that the state will allow the use of marijuana per it's statute. The US government can do absolutely nothing to overturn that law. NOTHING.

Have your nanny explain this to you, Concarty:

"Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause. It establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally, take precedence over state laws, and even state constitutions."

Ya esta, Concarty,

Case closed.
 
Have your nanny explain this to you, Concarty:

"Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause. It establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally, take precedence over state laws, and even state constitutions."

Ya esta, Concarty,

Case closed.

No, no and no. The Constitution does. Federal law does not. Period. End of story. Unless a state law is deemed unconstitutional, it doesn't matter if the state law is different than the Federal law. How can you post on a political chat board and be this fucking ignorant CABRONE.
 
Once again, read the fucking lawsuit you fucking imbecile. Seriously. It's like teaching a five year old. The lawsuit alleges that the STATE LAW ITSELF is unconstitutional. The one that was PASSED BY THE LEGISLATURE Jesus Christ, how are you all so fucking stupid.

Stop lying, Concarty.

“The Constitution simply states that "The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations" (Article I, section 4).”

The LEGISLATURE, not the state courts, Concarty.
 
No, no and no. The Constitution does. Federal law does not. Period. End of story. Unless a state law is deemed unconstitutional, it doesn't matter if the state law is different than the Federal law. How can you post on a political chat board and be this fucking ignorant CABRONE.

You are losing, Concarty...your cool and the debate.
 
Perhaps if I break it down in smaller sentences..."Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations" (Article I, section 4).”
 
The Supreme Court did not take the Pa. case because they deemed that it would not change the outcome (the Electoral Votes).

The Texas case will change the outcome (four states) by Biblical proportions.
 
Back
Top