This election isn't the first contested one

T. A. Gardner said:
Yep folks, that's right! This is not the first contested election in US history, and even isn't the most contentious. That award goes to the election of 1876. It was the most contentious presidential election in American history, and gave rise to the Compromise of 1877 in which the Democrats conceded the election to Hayes in return for an end to Reconstruction and the withdrawal of federal troops from the South. After a controversial post-election process, Hayes was declared the winner. There were four states with heavily contested election outcomes: Florida, Louisiana, S. Carolina, and Oregon. Rutherford Hayes, the winner got a minority of the vote too. The electoral vote was 185 to 184, Hayes winning by a single vote.
Click to expand...


DEMOCRATS objected to electoral vote certification last 3 times a Republican was elected president

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democrats-who-praised-2004-objections-to-electoral-college-certification-now-slam-hawley
 
BidenPresident said:
No, you asked a loaded question. I am pointing out how shallow your mind is.
Click to expand...

It was not a "loaded question" (aka complex question) fallacy. It was a straight forward question. Do you think Socialism would be a good thing for the US?

I can answer it easily. No, I think socialism would be bad thing for the US. Is that so hard for you to do?
 
T. A. Gardner said:
It was not a "loaded question" (aka complex question) fallacy. It was a straight forward question. Do you think Socialism would be a good thing for the US?

I can answer it easily. No, I think socialism would be bad thing for the US. Is that so hard for you to do?
Click to expand...



You live in a fantasy world. You think every liberal is a socialist. It is too dumb to take seriously.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
No, but it puts it in historical perspective. That's something you know zero about. For you history started in 2016 and even that's like almost irrelevant now. That's how the idiots, like you, on the Left roll. Morons like you have repeatedly stated that Trump's objections to the election are "unprecedented," or "never seen in history..." that sort of thing. Well, I proved that wrong with this thread. Like everything else the Left says and does, they got it wrong here too.
Click to expand...

Bullshit. I have read your ridiculous attempt at defending tRump. You have a bit more "polish" than most of the other fucktard tRumptards on POF, but you represent the same "cancer" nonetheless.

For the record, I have kept up with tRump since the mid 70's. Dumbasses like you only know the reality version of CorruptRump. You are gullible and not very bright. You are EXACTLY the kind of "conehead bonehead" tRump depends on. Well done dumbass.
 
Tacomaman said:
Bullshit. I have read your ridiculous attempt at defending tRump. You have a bit more "polish" than most of the other fucktard tRumptards on POF, but you represent the same "cancer" nonetheless.
Click to expand...

Gardner at least can write grammatical sentences. But still a pile of shit.
 
Tacomaman said:
So, in your childish mind, that makes tRump's attempted mockery of our democracy okay?
In other words, you are simply a brainwashed fucktard. Okay, you proved your point.
Click to expand...

well taco idiot its called exercising your constitutional rights , being a democrat you don't like that naturally
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top