There was likely considerable fraud, it just went undetected. One absolute example is that cumulative vote counts for Trump in a number of locations suddenly took a plunge into the negative and that was never explained. The cumulative vote count for any candidate should never go negative unless there is an exceptional and excellent explanation for why votes for that candidate were counted then later invalidated. None of that happened, but negative vote counts did happen.
https://votepatternanalysis.substack.com/p/voting-anomalies-2020
https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...ence_of_vanished_votes_in_pennsylvania. html
(see starting at about 20 minutes)
So you believe in undetectable fraud. That means you believe in it without evidence that it even exists. Do you think that is a compelling argument? Undetected requires belief without evidence. You should be ashamed to type such a thing.