nano Thermite found in all 911 dust samples

You don't require evidence because you're stupid.

That's the bottom line sir.

If you need example of the US government sacrificing innocent lives I'll be glad to take you back to elementary school and expalin it to you.

Trying to spin to another topic ain't gonna cut it....
Heres the bottom line...

Only a nut could believe a US Gov./Bush/Cheney/CIA/FBI/Saudi/Muslim/FAA/DOD conspiracy for 9/11...and thats not the entire list needed to pull it off...
The logistics alone make it more impossible than Clinton keeping his marriage vows....Geo. Bush's chances of re-election for Pres. in 2012 are better...

all you need to do is think about it, the impossibilities that need to happen without a hiccup for such a thing to be true are staggering....
 
Trying to spin to another topic ain't gonna cut it....
Heres the bottom line...

Only a nut could believe a US Gov./Bush/Cheney/CIA/FBI/Saudi/Muslim/FAA/DOD conspiracy for 9/11...and thats not the entire list needed to pull it off...
The logistics alone make it more impossible than Clinton keeping his marriage vows....Geo. Bush's chances of re-election for Pres. in 2012 are better...

all you need to do is think about it, the impossibilities that need to happen without a hiccup for such a thing to be true are staggering....

is that as impossible as a guy bilking billions of dollars out of customers in a ponzi scheme? Because I found the Madoff shit to be hard to believe. One guy managed all that? LOL OK.

If you trust your news sources, I feel sorry for you. No, you don't have good alternatives, but you should practice some skepticism when you get your info.

It's not even difficult for persons with vast amounts of money to influence society and profit from the herding of the cattle.

Just look at the bailouts.

My god, how can you trust anything anymore?
 
is that as impossible as a guy bilking billions of dollars out of customers in a ponzi scheme? Because I found the Madoff shit to be hard to believe. One guy managed all that? LOL OK.

If you trust your news sources, I feel sorry for you. No, you don't have good alternatives, but you should practice some skepticism when you get your info.

It's not even difficult for persons with vast amounts of money to influence society and profit from the herding of the cattle.

Just look at the bailouts.

My god, how can you trust anything anymore?

I don't think anyone really believes Madoff acted all by his lonesome...hes protecting his family and fellow crooks and proving others guilty ain't gonna be easy....maybe the Messiah is working on it....but whether others get arrested or not, I will believe he had many fellow crooks to aid a abet the ponzie scheme...

I don't know what news sources you're talkin about or on what topic you're referring to...but yeah, its always good to be somewhat skeptical, at least concerning the newest reports on events....
But...its been 8 years since the WTC....and time to face facts as to what is the most likely truth of events,...not unlike the JFK assassination, and the nuts that still hold to some secret, complex nonsense there.....

This governments 'secrets' are ridiculously widely known...Obamas giving out handouts on defense secrets to smear Bush, right now and Clinton handed out defense material to the Chinese for a few campaign bucks....

A conspiracy of that magnitude(the WTC) and of that complexity is just not feasible...
and the secrecy required to make it succeed is even more unbelievable....
sometimes the truth is right in front of our noses and obvious, we know need to imagine elaborate schemes too....
 
I don't think anyone really believes Madoff acted all by his lonesome...hes protecting his family and fellow crooks and proving others guilty ain't gonna be easy....maybe the Messiah is working on it....but whether others get arrested or not, I will believe he had many fellow crooks to aid a abet the ponzie scheme...

I don't know what news sources you're talkin about or on what topic you're referring to...but yeah, its always good to be somewhat skeptical, at least concerning the newest reports on events....
But...its been 8 years since the WTC....and time to face facts as to what is the most likely truth of events,...not unlike the JFK assassination, and the nuts that still hold to some secret, complex nonsense there.....

This governments 'secrets' are ridiculously widely known...Obamas giving out handouts on defense secrets to smear Bush, right now and Clinton handed out defense material to the Chinese for a few campaign bucks....

A conspiracy of that magnitude(the WTC) and of that complexity is just not feasible...
and the secrecy required to make it succeed is even more unbelievable....
sometimes the truth is right in front of our noses and obvious, we know need to imagine elaborate schemes too....

It is feasible. And jfk was a coverup too. Bad example. But keep on repeating your pathetic denials, government drone.
 
Yeah....reconcile what is REASONABLE....

The CIA were part of a conspiracy to bring down the WTC ?

Or, the FBI was part of a conspiracy to bring down the WTC ?

Or, Both the FBI and CIA were part of a conspiracy to bring down the WTC ?

Or, President Bush and VP Cheney were part of a conspiracy to bring down the WTC ?

Or, Our government, somehow, planted explosives in the WTC....? Anticipating the Mulsoms plot to fly planes into said buildings?

The secret WTC Government plot involved only few. ?

Or, The secret WTC Government plot must have involved thousands of plotters? in NY? in DC?

We can rest assured secrets like this, in our government are kept...like Roswell


What proof makes any of this crap "REASONABLE" to rational, thinking, people. ???:321:


Don't forget all the Jews that didn't go to work in the Towers, that day; because they were warned of the attack.
Don't you remember the report where some said that they saw Jews dancing in the streets of New York, when the planes hit??

:gives:
 
Gee, I never realized that an OPINION was evidence!!:eek:

You miss the point.

All he has is opinion.

Negative opinion without any consideration of facts or evidence .. by his own words.

He's free to express his purposefully unfounded opinion with you all day long .. but I'd really like to talk about evidence.

Most conversation on this issue gets lost in opinion. Everybody's got an opinion, few have the courage to honestly review the evidence.

That's the point.
 
And of course, you have irrefudable proof of this??

Unless it's just more conjecture, supposition, opinion, and HOPE!! :rolleyes:

Everything is refutable by people who who don't like truth. Sounds like you may be among the "Saddam had WMD" crowd so you may have some personal experience with what I'm talking about.

I apologize that this doesn't all fit on a bumper-sticker, and I don't have the use of crayons .. however, if you follow the bouncing ball ...

:) .. Sibel Edmonds .. Here's what she had to say ..
http://www.wanttoknow.info/sibeledmonds

:) .. On October 18, 2002 John Ashcroft asserts a rare state secret privilege which amounted to a gag order on Congress and Sibel Edmonds. This prevented the Senate Judiciary Committee from conducting public hearings and Senator Orin Hatch blocked closed hearings on the matter. Ashcroft's gag order also prevented Sibel from testifying in her own suit against the FBI and other suits filed by 9/11 families and the Project on Government Oversight (POGO).

Classified Letters Regarding FBI Whistleblower Sibel Edmonds
http://www.thememoryhole.org/spy/edmonds_letters.htm

Effectively Congress gagged from discussion of Edmonds testimony.

Also gagged are the employees at United and American Airlines (whose planes were involved), victims' family members, media reps who have reviewed pertinent classified material, FAA employees, FBI employees, fire-fighters, police officers, and first-responders have all been officially gagged and restricted from talking or reporting to the press and Congress.

Feel free to research this with Fox News or whatever source you feel comfortable with.
 
You miss the point.

All he has is opinion.

Negative opinion without any consideration of facts or evidence .. by his own words.

He's free to express his purposefully unfounded opinion with you all day long .. but I'd really like to talk about evidence.

Most conversation on this issue gets lost in opinion. Everybody's got an opinion, few have the courage to honestly review the evidence.

That's the point.

So he has an OPINON that he's foiund something that supports the idea that the Goverment was involved and that they've hid the truth.
You seem to accept this, without doubt; but you appear to dismiss everything else that says the Government wasn't involved.
 
Everything is refutable by people who who don't like truth. Sounds like you may be among the "Saddam had WMD" crowd so you may have some personal experience with what I'm talking about.

I apologize that this doesn't all fit on a bumper-sticker, and I don't have the use of crayons .. however, if you follow the bouncing ball ...

:) .. Sibel Edmonds .. Here's what she had to say ..
http://www.wanttoknow.info/sibeledmonds

:) .. On October 18, 2002 John Ashcroft asserts a rare state secret privilege which amounted to a gag order on Congress and Sibel Edmonds. This prevented the Senate Judiciary Committee from conducting public hearings and Senator Orin Hatch blocked closed hearings on the matter. Ashcroft's gag order also prevented Sibel from testifying in her own suit against the FBI and other suits filed by 9/11 families and the Project on Government Oversight (POGO).

Classified Letters Regarding FBI Whistleblower Sibel Edmonds
http://www.thememoryhole.org/spy/edmonds_letters.htm

Effectively Congress gagged from discussion of Edmonds testimony.

Also gagged are the employees at United and American Airlines (whose planes were involved), victims' family members, media reps who have reviewed pertinent classified material, FAA employees, FBI employees, fire-fighters, police officers, and first-responders have all been officially gagged and restricted from talking or reporting to the press and Congress.

Feel free to research this with Fox News or whatever source you feel comfortable with.

And yet with all the information that's been "leaked" by those that wish to remain anymomous, nohting has come out.

You believe this; because you want to.
I guess you've dismissed the video where Bin Laden admitted to the plans being made and laughing abouit the hijackers that weren't informed of the intended plan to fly the planes into the tower.

The towers collapsed; because of the pancake effect.
 
And yet with all the information that's been "leaked" by those that wish to remain anymomous, nohting has come out.

You believe this; because you want to.
I guess you've dismissed the video where Bin Laden admitted to the plans being made and laughing abouit the hijackers that weren't informed of the intended plan to fly the planes into the tower.

The towers collapsed; because of the pancake effect.

LOL simpleton

http://www.welfarestate.com/wtc/faketape/

ignore this too .
http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=a86buildingkhost
 
it's hilarious!
you cite the propaganda used to convince you. There couldn't be a clearer example of how you're being manipulated, yet you cling to it. Absolutely stunning. Then you go another level further into stupidity and call others names.
 
Now that's the way to convince someone to consider other information!! :321:


why would I bother? Being nice, trying to discuss the topic,whatever approach is tried, people like you pooh pooh it and you cite propaganda as your evidence.

I bet you would go to microsoft websites to get computer reviews. Or I bet you would watch a informercial and think the people giving testimonials are genuine.
 
why would I bother? Being nice, trying to discuss the topic,whatever approach is tried, people like you pooh pooh it and you cite propaganda as your evidence.

I bet you would go to microsoft websites to get computer reviews. Or I bet you would watch a informercial and think the people giving testimonials are genuine.

And paranoid c/d's, like yourself, label everything that doesn't fir your agenda, as propaganda.

Oh-well; you are entitled to your opinion, no matter how wrong it is.
 
why would I bother? Being nice, trying to discuss the topic,whatever approach is tried, people like you pooh pooh it and you cite propaganda as your evidence.

I bet you would go to microsoft websites to get computer reviews. Or I bet you would watch a informercial and think the people giving testimonials are genuine.

Guilty as charged about the computer reviews.
 
Back
Top