Trump's Amazing Insight

No I am not. The mistake you make is thinking that you can lie at will without being challenged.

Yes you are.

For instance, PA had registered about 922,000 new voters between 2016 and 2020...yet you made no mention of that in anything you posted.

Why?
 
I see that math and reality are not your forte'. So Trump beats his winning election by 11,237,852 votes and Biden, a person NO ONE was excited about, beats that by 7,060,140 and it doesn't raise your eyebrows?

Not at all because of all the people who registered to vote between 2016 and 2020...in PA, that was 922,000 voters alone.

You just can't stand it that more people voted in 2020 than 2016 because you and Trump fucked up COVID in early 2020.
 
2020 election:
Using the numbers as of today, which are materially similar to Binney’s, we find a huge issue. If we have 213.8 million registered voters in the US and 66.2% of all voters voted in the 2020 election, that equals 141.5 voters who voted in the 2020 election (Binney shows 140 million which is materially the same).

Based on data from NBC, Biden got 81,283,098 votes and Trump got 74,222,958 votes. Other votes totaled 2,926,539. That sums to 158,432,595 votes. How is that even remotely possible?

Only dishonest ,lying dumb fucks can say that there is ZERO evidence of fraud with the actual numbers proving that there HAD to be.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...on-votes-eligible-voters-voted-2020-election/

Here is why I doubt the election results. But most importantly, why any election using mail in ballots should be met with skepticism.

I find it very difficult to believe that an incompetent, unaccomplished, senile 79 year old racist could win with 80 million votes, bettering Obama by 15,367,303 votes. A guy who could barely fill a thimble of supporters at rallies and rarely came out of the basement or remember what office he was actually running for.

I find it very difficult to believe that Trump, garnering 74,222,958 votes, which beat a much more popular Obama by 8.307,163 votes and who had massive, enthusiastic crowds at his events, could lose an election by 7,060,140 votes.

I find it difficult to believe that Trump, who bettered his 2016 election WIN by 11,237,852 votes and would still lose.

I find it difficult to believe that a election turnout for Obama was 57.1% and 9.2% lower than this election at 66.3%. That's the highest turnout for a boring candidate in the history of the Republic.
Turnout increased in every state and in 98 percent of the nation’s counties.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graph...voter-turnout/

I find it difficult to believe that Republicans INCREASED their House presence by 13 seats, yet Trump lost by such a large margin to a incompetent, unaccomplished, senile 79 year old racist.

BUT, leftists, being the low IQ, uneducated, gullible dumbasses that they are, show ZERO curiosity and merely parrot the dimwitted narratives they are fed by the PHONY media. They're incapable of thinking for themselves.

The above is angry trash.

If you were smarter or enough in control of your feelings you might compose a competent argument. For that you would need facts, so on second thought maybe you couldn't.
 
The above is angry trash.

If you were smarter or enough in control of your feelings you might compose a competent argument. For that you would need facts, so on second thought maybe you couldn't.

They're all pretending as if no one registered to vote between 2016 and 2020, and they're also pretending that their shitty COVID response didn't lead to increased Absentee voting, when it absolutely did.
 
Somehow it doesn't occur to these guys that if there really had been more votes than voters the scandal would have been national news and a dominant story in Pennsylvania, not
this tempest in a tea pot.
 
Somehow it doesn't occur to these guys that if there really had been more votes than voters the scandal would have been national news and a dominant story in Pennsylvania, not
this tempest in a tea pot.

Conservatives are habitual liars.

From 2016-2020, 8M Americans reached voting age, about 9M Americans became eligible voters, and turnout was up 8% which translated to 23M more votes than in 2016.
 
In Pennsylvania, 922,000 new voters were registered between Election Day 2016 and Election Day 2020.

Democrats have voter registration advantage in four battleground states
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/me...r-registration-advantage-four-states-n1238805

Pennsylvania; A state where Trump led by 700,000 votes Wednesday morning. Why? A State that could not count all of its votes on election night. Why? A State that after counting additional votes for a week, managed to find more than a million votes for Biden that they couldn't count election night. Why?

Yep, if you think this doesn't stink to high heaven, you're a hack, a liar or just plain stupid. [/size] :palm:
 
Yes you are.

For instance, PA had registered about 922,000 new voters between 2016 and 2020...yet you made no mention of that in anything you posted.

Why?

Not at all because of all the people who registered to vote between 2016 and 2020...in PA, that was 922,000 voters alone.

You just can't stand it that more people voted in 2020 than 2016 because you and Trump fucked up COVID in early 2020.

I see that you continue to parrot the same lame lie over and over again. It's not JUST the number of voters. How many registered voters typically vote in an election?

Why couldn't Pennsylvania count all their votes on election night? How did a 700,000 vote advantage just disappear for Trump by.........counting votes for a week until you had an additional million for the incompetent, corrupt, senile old dunce Biden?

What flavor of Kool-Aid are they feeding you?
:palm:
 
The above is angry trash.

Wrong; they are called FACTS you willful idiot. Your posts, nothing BUT trash. Try to be less of a lying moron. :palm:

If you were smarter or enough in control of your feelings you might compose a competent argument. For that you would need facts, so on second thought maybe you couldn't.

If you had a brain you could comprehend the argument. But being a low IQ leftist moron on steroids, all you can do is bloviate bullshit. Run along clown. :palm:
 
Pennsylvania; A state where Trump led by 700,000 votes Wednesday morning. Why?

Because not all the votes had been counted...that's why.


A State that could not count all of its votes on election night.

You're the ones who didn't want the states to count Absentee and mail-in ballots on or before Election Day, remember?????


managed to find more than a million votes for Biden that they couldn't count election night. Why?

Because you didn't want the states to count all the votes on Election night, REMEMBER?????


Yep, if you think this doesn't stink to high heaven, you're a hack, a liar or just plain stupid.

You don't even know what the hell you're talking about, and you don't even remember the position you held p[rior to election day, which was that states shouldn't count mail-in or Absentee votes until after.

That's what you wanted, idiot.

We told you that this would happen if you didn't want to count the Absentee votes first, but you insisted we don't. You even had the GQP pass laws in some states saying they couldn't count all the votes on Election Day.

YOU WANTED IT THAT WAY, REMEMBER???? THIS WAS WHAT YOU WANTED.
 
I see that you continue to parrot the same lame lie over and over again. It's not JUST the number of voters. How many registered voters typically vote in an election?


About 55%, and this election was 62% because of COVID and people choosing Absentee voting instead of going to the polls.

You're the ones who made it that way because you lied about COVID from Jan-Mar and turned it into a pandemic that prompted more Absentee voting.

Turnout was higher in 2020 than 2016 because of Absentee voting.


Why couldn't Pennsylvania count all their votes on election night?

Because you didn't want them to.

You're the ones who demanded that Absentee votes get counted last.

You're the ones who, in some states, passed laws against counting Absentee votes before Election Day.

You're the ones who did all that, and now you're complaining about it?

Eat shit, loser.
 
Last edited:
counting votes for a week until you had an additional million for the incompetent, corrupt, senile old dunce Biden?

Those were legally cast votes that you didn't want to count before Election Day.

You didn't want to count them.

You threw a whole fit about it in 2020, remember?

You stamped your foot and held your breath until certain states agreed to not count votes early.

PA was one of those states.

So you are the one who didn't want to count the votes as they came in. You insisted we wait until the polls close to count the votes.

So that's why it took so long...BECAUSE OF YOU.

PA could have had their election results ready at midnight, but you didn't want that to happen.

You wanted to count the Absentee votes last because you were trying to get them thrown out entirely.
 
They're all pretending as if no one registered to vote between 2016 and 2020, and they're also pretending that their shitty COVID response didn't lead to increased Absentee voting, when it absolutely did.

Gee, that must be the reason Obama got 3,582,720 FEWER votes FOUR years later right? Dunce. :rolleyes:

Obama 2008 - 69,498,516
Obama 2012 - 65,915,796
Trump 2016 - 62,985,106
Biden 2020 - 81,283,098
Trump 2020 - 74,222,958

Vote Count 2008: 131,473,705
Vote Count 2012: 129,237,642 Decrease by 2,236,063
Vote Count 2016: 137,143,218
Vote Count 2020: 158,584,425

https://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/national.php?f=0&off=99
 
Somehow it doesn't occur to these guys that if there really had been more votes than voters the scandal would have been national news and a dominant story in Pennsylvania, not
this tempest in a tea pot.

Who claimed there were more votes than voters dumbass? :palm:
 
Gee, that must be the reason Obama got 3,582,720 FEWER votes FOUR years later right?


Because, moron, turnout in 2008 was 57.1% and turnout in 2012 was 53.8%.

These are easily researched facts that you seem incapable of finding yourself, and the reason you are incapable of that is because you're a fucking idiot.

After all, you were conned by a reality TV show host into toiling his baggage for the rest of your life, not his.
 
Because not all the votes had been counted...that's why.

Why not? Has there ever been an election where PA couldn't get the votes counted in one night? Yet today, we are led to believe that valid elections can count the votes for a week, or at least until the media's preferred candidate is elected?

You're the ones who didn't want the states to count Absentee and mail-in ballots on or before Election Day, remember?????

LYING again I see. If you are typing, you are either lying or spamming the forum with ignorant bullshit. :palm:

Because you didn't want the states to count all the votes on Election night, REMEMBER?????

LYING again I see. If you are typing, you are either lying or spamming the forum with ignorant bullshit. :palm:

You don't even know what the hell you're talking about, and you don't even remember the position you held p[rior to election day, which was that states shouldn't count mail-in or Absentee votes until after.

That's what you wanted, idiot.

LYING again I see. If you are typing, you are either lying or spamming the forum with ignorant bullshit. :palm:

We told you that this would happen if you didn't want to count the Absentee votes first, but you insisted we don't. You even had the GQP pass laws in some states saying they couldn't count all the votes on Election Day.

YOU WANTED IT THAT WAY, REMEMBER???? THIS WAS WHAT YOU WANTED.

LYING again I see. If you are typing, you are either lying or spamming the forum with ignorant bullshit.

Hey DUMBASS, Florida had NO problems with absentee and mail in votes being counted ON election night. Why?
:palm:
 
Turnout
Election Voting Age population (VAP) % Turnout of VAP
2008 - 229,945,000 - 57.1%
2012 - 235,248,000 - 53.8%
2016 - 249,422,000 - 54.8%
2020 - 257,605,088 - 62.0%
 
Why not? Has there ever been an election where PA couldn't get the votes counted in one night? Yet today, we are led to believe that valid elections can count the votes for a week, or at least until the media's preferred candidate is elected?

PA's results didn't come in until several days after in the 2016 election.

Also, you didn't want to count the Absentee votes until after the polls closed.

So this is really your problem that you caused yourself.
 
LYING again I see. If you are typing, you are either lying or spamming the forum with ignorant bullshit.

You are the ones who insisted that the Absentee votes not get counted as they came in, not get counted early, resulting in the backlog of ballots to be processed and counted.

YOU WANTED IT THAT WAY.
 
Back
Top