People can see just by watching the video, people can understand by the explanation, and people can think even if you continue to say "You're a dummy!" And BTW, the plane didn't "magically disappear". In fact it's debris was strewn throughout the buildings. People can even see and understand that clearly with information I provided, let alone the information provided from other sources throughout the thread.
Except everything that I have said has not been even close to "kicked in the ass".You're delusional .. and a bit of a coward brother.
I repeat, EVERYTHING you've said in this thread has been kicked in the ass by facts and evidence. EVERYTHING.
Actually, there isn't much point discussing the evidence anymore. You don't have any that rises to the level of the 8th grade. And if you got your pancake theory from your structural engineer friend, neither does he. Neither one of you have ever been introduced to the Laws of Physics, The Law of Falling Objects, The Law of Momentum, or The Second Law of Thermodynamics.
If that's where you got that bullshit from, tell your friend to log in so I can tell him that personally.
The claims you put forward are unbelieveable. "Large volumes of thermite in the area." .. small wonder that had to be pulled out of you .. because you had to have pulled that one of of your ass. What credible source did you get that bullshit from?
You've already lost the evidence debate long ago. The only question that remains is what would make an otherwise intelligent person talk like a moron?
Cowardice would do that. You KNOW the official story is bullshit, but you don't have the courage to face the truth .. so you invent all kinds of non-sensical bullshit to hide behind. You couldn't possibly be as dense as your comments would indicate.
You KNOW your theory about the government covering up for terrorists who planted explosives is STUPID .. which is why you offer no expanation of how that could possibly be accomplished after I posted a list of who some of the clients in the building were.
You should just leave it alone sir and do as you've suggested by staying out of it. You only end up making yourself look silly.
Except everything that I have said has not been even close to "kicked in the ass".
The logical fallacies in this post alone are many. The appeal to populism (using the snob approach) notwithstanding, your grasp of physics is questionable at best and simply wrong.
Another logical fallacy used is the Straw Man. Nobody here said "Gravity caused it", that is just another example of the fallacious arguments you use to "buttress" an already weak argument.
As for the amounts of thermite needed I get it from the fact that to have tons of molten material spilling from the tower you would need tons of thermite, 2 pounds to 1 pound of molten steel produced in fact. It simply is. You profess that all molten materials were steel and therefore must be produced by thermite, I simply use the direct equation used by welders. 2 pounds of thermite to 1 pound of molten steel. It isn't rocket science, but it does clearly show that you would need a lot of thermite to produce the "tons of molten metal" you say was found (and that I was able to explain).
There is no "cowardice" present in my posts, that's just pure silliness.
I've said myriad times that had my friend not been present to show me these things I would be you. I can see how you got to where you went, see the path that was taken, and know that I myself would likely take those same steps had I not had my friend showing me these things.
I've invented nothing, but I have produced much anger in you by simply pointing out what can be seen, and easily, by people who want to look. It wasn't for your benefit that I spoke at all in this thread, because I have already stated that your mind was long ago made up on this and there will be nothing that can change it.
Enough anger for your constant ad hom attacks building to a crescendo. This is some of the weakest argument I have ever seen from you, and you cannot even recognize that much. You are a capable person, but on this subject you are blinded in your anger.
I claimed it was not for your benefit. That is pointless. All you have is logical fallacy and inept straw men.Dude, don't confuse anger with a mocking rejection.
I don't have anything to be angry about. You have demonstrated the truth of my position quite well sir.
Anger? .. shit, I should be inviting you to dinner.
I know it wasn't for my benefit that you spoke in this thread .. in spite of your own claim that it was. You spoke because you thought you had a point.
I see little benefit in our talking about each other, but I recognize that's all you have left. EVERYTHING you said was discredited .. EASILY.
I would however like to have your structural engineer friend log in.
Tell him I dare his ass to log in and touch this subject.![]()
Dude, don't confuse anger with a mocking rejection.
I don't have anything to be angry about. You have demonstrated the truth of my position quite well sir.
Anger? .. shit, I should be inviting you to dinner.
I know it wasn't for my benefit that you spoke in this thread .. in spite of your own claim that it was. You spoke because you thought you had a point.
I see little benefit in our talking about each other, but I recognize that's all you have left. EVERYTHING you said was discredited .. EASILY.
I would however like to have your structural engineer friend log in.
Tell him I dare his ass to log in and touch this subject.![]()
All very nice prose .. perhaps you should be a writer .. 'cause you ain't much as a debater. You didn't come back with anything to refute what you claim as I did.
And by the way, yeah, my "snarky comments" feel very good. Thanks.
You seem to have no problem with snarky comments when you use them, why should I. I've attempted civil debate on this issue in every way I could save getting on my knees and begging for it. But unfounded opinion, insults, and snarky comments was all the fairy-tale believers had to offer. You aren't really looking for civil debate on this issue because just as this thread demonstrates, truth is not on your side. Nor is intelligence, science, logic, or even common sense.
Me, me, I want to guess.
I guess they'll be applying heat that exceeds any heat that can be generated by fire alone, especially jet fuel which is basically kerosene.
.. a concept most 8th graders understand.
Bush was soo stupid but he and Rove could mastermind this. LOFL
I do believe he lied on the inteligence going into Iraq. Only freaking nutjobs like the moon hoax guy believe 911 was done by us.
WHY WAS THERMITE EVEN PRESENT IN THE BUILDINGS WHEN IT SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN?
And again, it ends with the endless repeat and rehash, even with this. Your schtick on this subject is always the same. You ask a question. I (or in this thread SF and others as I have largely kept my promise to stay out of the conversation) research and find links that refute what you lead into with your question. You then say that nobody answered your question and post it again, then again (often with different sources as well as the same) it is refuted and answered. You then ask again....
It goes round and round and is pointless.
I fully expect you to repeat the worthless "running away" stuff, it's as pointless as the whole of this thread has been, a microcosm if you will.
Then when somebody comes in and posts stuff that refutes what you claim you know to be true, you will again post the same thing and accuse them of not answering questions.
This presumes that the report that the dust samples contained thermite is correct.