USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
I never knew that the definition of "critical thought" meant to just agree with the presenter.
nano Thermite found in all 911 dust samples
- Thread starter evince
- Start date
I never knew that the definition of "critical thought" meant to just agree with the presenter.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
True. If I could just get it through your head that white people have civil rights too, we could be an item.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Then explain why the CT's want to so much believe the scientists that tell them what they allready feel.
*rhetorical question*
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
Are you aware of how devastating speaking truth to this could be to one's career?
If you aren't take a look at Dr. Jones.
Are you aware of how devastting speaking truth to power is?
If you aren't look at Cynthia McKinney.
The system turns them into clowns .. and people who don't actually think for themselves buy it.
There is no upside to speaking truth to power .. there is only duty, honor, and responsibility.
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
That's good.I'm speechless.
By the way, have you seen Superfreak lately?
We've seem to have lost him.
Shall we just start listing post numbers then? Seriously, this really has gotten repetitive. And it doesn't matter the quality, number, expertise of the experts I link to, all you give me is Jones-style already debunked links and rehash/repeat, with the occasional "Nobody has answered this question" even though it was answered in post number 4 (yes really that early in the thread).. When that is pointed out, more "Nobody has answered." comes around, reposting links to experts who debunked Jones and his theory....
As I said, that's what this conversation is with you. While I can see from your vantage you pretend that no other vantage is possible because some guy that I've never heard of says so, even though myriad experts say they are bull and explain why with what I studied.... math.
As I said to AHZ... Distrust does not mean you must follow into the illogical and refuted and repeat the discredited as if it were credulous. Distrust doesn't mean you have to believe EVERYTHING that is said about the government that is bad. Sometimes people are just wrong, even if they are talking smack at the government.
Sometimes work gets in the way, you know that, brother... We all know that.
I'm speechless.
By the way, have you seen Superfreak lately?
We've seem to have lost him.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
they got bombs in here in 93....
and thank you for being honest that it is possible....
maybe i missed it, but have you blamed anyone else other than the US government for placing the alleged bombs? or have you gone after one suspect only?
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
eh....no....looks top to bottom to me...hence the top columns falling first....
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
I think you misunderstood.
I was saying that a controlled demolition results in a building coming down, from the bottom up.
The Towers fell from the top down; ergo: it was not a controlled demolition.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
you mean, especially if they're talking smack at the government, right?
No, I mean what I say. Even if they are talking smack at the government. Your ad homs need work today. What's wrong?
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
But this thing was totally an inside job. Do you believe it's a possibility the goverment had any collusion in this at all, like you believe it's a possibility terrorists may have planted bombs in the building? Just be honest.
Just feeling listless? Have you gone to the doctor for a diabetes checkup?
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
oh the irony in your post....
damo must accept that the government could be liable....but that terrorist could be liable is not considered by you...
as it was like totally, like an inside job...
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
I believe it's a possiblity that terrorists did it. Can damo be as fair minded? Doubtful. He's a clozy.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
Read the thread. Please. So you can quit being so repetitively ignorant. Long ago I said, "If the government did this, it didn't use thermite for the myriad reasons listed."
Anything is possible, except thermite because it would be impossible to cover up, it would have been the smoking gun, it leaves far more than traces of elements in dust that make its use obvious, I pointed those out then people tried to use pictures that show no steel melting to try to say steel "melted", on and on it goes.... Amazing how people who are so awesome at conspiracy would be so inept in their choices.
I then stated that I think many in the government covered stuff so they wouldn't appear so inept. What I think happened is that terrorists did this, and that we will never have every answer because some inept government employees covered up stuff to hide their total lack of ability and to keep their job.
You are being a tool, unable to think at all because distrust has led you into the inept bumbling of the Jones crowd. Discredited, dishonest, shown to be taking things out of context and to be simply wrong directly yet encumbered by the truth they trudge on, with a following of the credulous willing to believe anything if only it says something bad about the government. The worse, the better. Sometimes the truth is bad enough, without all the inane additions of magical thermite that leaves no trace but chemicals in dust.
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
My brother .. I rest my case.
You've exposed that all you have left is dishonesty on this issue.
I like you .. but any honest mind can see what this is.
I'm the fucking socialist here. Shouldn't I be the one defending "government?" .. and isn't that what I quite often do?
Am I a Bush-basher? What have I accused him of that he didn't do .. outside of 9/11? .. which he did do
Your position is that science is wrong and the actual people who designed and built the buildings are wrong.
Hard to argue with that.
Not particularly, especially the government that was in power at that time.
My position is science is correct, and have stated it and given links to studies and experts, including the very studies that are taken out of context and "misinterpreted" by your "Dr." Jones.
It hasn't been "hard" to argue this, in fact it has been quite easy. It's pretty much restating things over and over with different sources saying the same thing and patiently repeating answers that you have said didn't exist.
The dishonesty lies in the out of context statements of studies that are shown not to say what the good "Dr." says they do. I don't know what has crippled your mind, but I do know that the government as it was then, or even as it is now is not your ideal and you distrust it. So do I. I just don't let that get in the way of facts and evidence before me or critical thought. While the idea of government conspiracy is something that isn't foreign to me, the only way they conspired here was to cover their mistakes at what should have been easier to spot and stop....