Is an egg a chicken?

Hello Cypress,

Cypress said:
You would not risk your life to run into a burning fertility clinic to save a petri dish of blastocysts, so you do not actually think a human life actually begins at conception.

It is strictly a question for metaphysics, not science.
Click to expand...

What an excellent point!

:hand:
 
Hello Darth,

Darth Omar said:
Of course you know what I’m talking about lol.

It’s nuts and bolts biology, but since it has ‘certain implications for a certain issue’ you/they can’t accept it. Hence, all the metaphysical and epistemological somersaults.

Progressives have done the same thing with the gender identity stuff: they can’t accept the straightforward biology so they invent terms and etc.
Click to expand...

No, we are trying to keep government out of people's lives.

We don't think freedoms should be limited just because somebody else is offended.

We're not trying to cancel people's freedom.

There is no point in making crimes out of people exercising their freedom where there is no victim of the 'crime.'
 
PoliTalker said:
Hello Darth,

We don't hear you talking like that in the Climate Change thread.
Click to expand...

Climate change is a theory. And a debatable theory at that.

There’s nothing theoretical about when an organism begins to exist. In fact, it’s the definition of settled science.

This should even be a debate.
 
Darth Omar said:
Climate change is a theory. And a debatable theory at that.

There’s nothing theoretical about when an organism begins to exist. In fact, it’s the definition of settled science.

This should even be a debate.
Click to expand...

We have already settled that. LOL. Why don't you go further and try to tell us what you are trying to debate?
 
AProudLefty said:
That the chicken egg is a species of chicken? That's what you've been debating? :rofl2:

Yes every living things are parts of species at any stages of development.
Click to expand...

A species of organism is always the same species of organism regardless of the stage of development.

It’s always an organism and it’s always the same organism from the moment it’s conceived.

You seem to have a problem with this lol.
 
Darth Omar said:
A species of organism is always the same species of organism regardless of the stage of development.

It’s always an organism and it’s always the same organism from the moment it’s conceived.

You seem to have a problem with this lol.
Click to expand...

Yes. The species are always the same species. Unless they branch off of an evolutionary tree.
 
PoliTalker said:
This is most amusing.

In this thread we have one conservative arguing that science supports the conservative position, and in another thread we have a conservative arguing that the science which supports the liberal position on climate change is meaningless.

Priceless!
Click to expand...

no surprises.....the demmycrats are on the wrong side of science on both issues.....
 
Cypress said:
There are multiple definitions of life, and you could spend hours googling any number of them.

The fact that two centuries after the onset of molecular biology there still is not a universal scientific consensus, tenet, or law on a precise definition of life highlights that it is a metaphysical question.

There is no empirical reality behind our numerous definitions of life. It is all based on subjective metaphysics.
Click to expand...

no.....there is alive and there is dead........there is only one scientific definition of either......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top