The GOP has no policy to run on

Jim Eagle said:
This is just your excuse for not wanting to admit that I'm correct about states rights.
Click to expand...

I always thought that states rights were an odd policy to run on. First off, in the West, we usually talk about individual rights, but you are arguing for government rights. Beyond that just one level of government. Not local or federal government rights, but just state level government rights. A state is not a standard unit, so how could it be the perfect unit of government? It goes in size from 400,000 people to 100 times that.

Then we look at what it has been used for. It was used to defend slavery, and segregation. It was used repeatedly to defend racism, and government persecution of minorities. Those same state righters were against states rights when some states wanted to defend the freedom of Blacks, or when some states wanted to desegregate.

Maybe not for Jim, but for many people "states rights" is just a dog whistle for racism.
 
LV426 said:
How ‘Owning the Libs’ Became the GOP’s Core Belief
The weird journey of a tongue-in-cheek catchphrase from conservative-mocking putdown to the defining tenet of the Republican Party’s way of life.
https://www.politico.com/news/magaz...ibs-history-trump-politics-pop-culture-477203

Conservatism is an intellectually devoid movement anyway, that elevates laziness and selfishness because it's easier than coming up with policies and ideas that can attract votes.
Click to expand...
That is because the GOP or GQP at betraying America and anything else of a civilized nature on Earth lost its soul to Russians, the devil and other foreign and squalid domestic enemies against humanity, and of the hell bound gutter nature on their decrepit and filthy lucre souls.
 
Cypress said:
Medicaid was a typo in my post, but it is a real program. Another Democratic program which millions of Trump loving Deplorables avail themselves of.

If you do not know what Medicaid is, you should not even be posting on a political forum. Your ignorance leads me to believe you and your relatives enthusiastically avail themselves of many programs which were brainchilds of liberals without even realizing it.
Click to expand...

:wrongkiddo:

I know what Medicaid is, and me and 99% of my family have never used their services.
 
LV426 said:
How ‘Owning the Libs’ Became the GOP’s Core Belief
The weird journey of a tongue-in-cheek catchphrase from conservative-mocking putdown to the defining tenet of the Republican Party’s way of life.
https://www.politico.com/news/magaz...ibs-history-trump-politics-pop-culture-477203

Conservatism is an intellectually devoid movement anyway, that elevates laziness and selfishness because it's easier than coming up with policies and ideas that can attract votes.
Click to expand...

Sure the GOP/GQP has a policy to run on but its policy is not of a civilized, lawful, decent or ethical nature as a seditious, terrorist, moral rot and treasonous policy that is of a un American, uncivilized and hell bound nature.
 
Concart said:
LOL, of course it is. It was passed under a Democratic President by a Democratic Congress. The only party interested in dismantling it is Republicans. The ACA benefits all Americans. The American Recovery Act benefitted all Americans.

Republicans literally have no policy positions. You should just strategically withdraw.
Click to expand...

our policy is to save america from the chicoms, not capitulate like you.

who are those retarded people in your photo?
 
Walt said:
I always thought that states rights were an odd policy to run on. First off, in the West, we usually talk about individual rights, but you are arguing for government rights. Beyond that just one level of government. Not local or federal government rights, but just state level government rights. A state is not a standard unit, so how could it be the perfect unit of government? It goes in size from 400,000 people to 100 times that.

Then we look at what it has been used for. It was used to defend slavery, and segregation. It was used repeatedly to defend racism, and government persecution of minorities. Those same state righters were against states rights when some states wanted to defend the freedom of Blacks, or when some states wanted to desegregate.

Maybe not for Jim, but for many people "states rights" is just a dog whistle for racism.
Click to expand...

You libs always wave the race card when states rights are mentioned. It's how you belittle the states rights argument. However it is the argument that the Founders chose.
 
LV426 said:
How ‘Owning the Libs’ Became the GOP’s Core Belief
The weird journey of a tongue-in-cheek catchphrase from conservative-mocking putdown to the defining tenet of the Republican Party’s way of life.
https://www.politico.com/news/magaz...ibs-history-trump-politics-pop-culture-477203

Conservatism is an intellectually devoid movement anyway, that elevates laziness and selfishness because it's easier than coming up with policies and ideas that can attract votes.
Click to expand...

Actually the GQP/GOP does have a policy to run on when it comes to conspiring in the sewer to wage war on the the entirety of humanity on Earth as un American swine.
 
Jim Eagle said:
You libs always wave the race card when states rights are mentioned.
Click to expand...

Because "states rights" is Conservative code for racism.


It's how you belittle the states rights argument.
Click to expand...

Are you fucking seriously WHINING about people not taking your bullshit racist argument seriously because it comes from you?

What a fucking WHINER.


However it is the argument that the Founders chose.
Click to expand...

You don't know SHIT about what the Founders chose, and if the Founders could see you today, they'd shake their heads at your fascist tendencies.
 
Jim Eagle said:
You libs always wave the race card when states rights are mentioned. It's how you belittle the states rights argument. However it is the argument that the Founders chose.
Click to expand...

You are one uneducated dirt bag, you know nothing about history and the south using the term states rights to defend Jim crow, your spawners must have been as dumb as you
 
LV426 said:
How ‘Owning the Libs’ Became the GOP’s Core Belief
The weird journey of a tongue-in-cheek catchphrase from conservative-mocking putdown to the defining tenet of the Republican Party’s way of life.
https://www.politico.com/news/magaz...ibs-history-trump-politics-pop-culture-477203

Conservatism is an intellectually devoid movement anyway, that elevates laziness and selfishness because it's easier than coming up with policies and ideas that can attract votes.
Click to expand...

Its probably as a result of selling out to foreign enemies and the devil to engage in antigovernment conspiracies and wage war on Democracy and civilization, seditious and treasonous GOPers probably haven't a soul to run on either.
 
Jim Eagle said:
No it's not
Click to expand...

Yes it is. Tax cuts too. We know this because Lee Atwater told us:


You start out in 1954 by saying, Nigger, nigger, nigger. By 1968 you can’t say nigger—that hurts you, backfires. So you say stuff like, uh, forced busing, states’ rights, and all that stuff, and you’re getting so abstract. Now, you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a by product of them is, blacks get hurt worse than whites and subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I’m not saying that. But, I’m saying that if it is getting that abstract and that coded, uh that we’re doing away with the racial problem one way or another you follow me cause obviously saying we want to cut this, is much more abstract than even the busing thing, uh, and a hell of a lot more abstract than nigger, nigger, you know? So, any way you look at it race is coming in on the back burner”
Click to expand...

Now, please proceed to tell us how Lee Atwater is not a Conservative, Republican, or racist piece of shit.
 
Jim Eagle said:
It's just another liberal narrative that you bought into, because you don't know how to think for yourself.
Click to expand...

What is most pathetic about you is that you project all your shortcomings and inadequacies on people you perceive to be your superiors.

It's not a liberal narrative when Lee Atwater tells you that your "states rights" argument is nothing more than racist, coded BS:

“You start out in 1954 by saying, N*gger, n*gger, n*gger. By 1968 you can’t say nigger—that hurts you, backfires. So you say stuff like, uh, forced busing, states’ rights, and all that stuff, and you’re getting so abstract. Now, you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a by product of them is, blacks get hurt worse than whites and subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I’m not saying that. But, I’m saying that if it is getting that abstract and that coded, uh that we’re doing away with the racial problem one way or another you follow me cause obviously saying we want to cut this, is much more abstract than even the busing thing, uh, and a hell of a lot more abstract than nigger, nigger, you know? So, any way you look at it race is coming in on the back burner”
 
LV426 said:
What is most pathetic about you is that you project all your shortcomings and inadequacies on people you perceive to be your superiors.

It's not a liberal narrative when Lee Atwater tells you that your "states rights" argument is nothing more than racist, coded BS:

“You start out in 1954 by saying, N*gger, n*gger, n*gger. By 1968 you can’t say nigger—that hurts you, backfires. So you say stuff like, uh, forced busing, states’ rights, and all that stuff, and you’re getting so abstract. Now, you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a by product of them is, blacks get hurt worse than whites and subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I’m not saying that. But, I’m saying that if it is getting that abstract and that coded, uh that we’re doing away with the racial problem one way or another you follow me cause obviously saying we want to cut this, is much more abstract than even the busing thing, uh, and a hell of a lot more abstract than nigger, nigger, you know? So, any way you look at it race is coming in on the back burner”
Click to expand...

How ironic.

Re: The Nation, lol.
 
guno said:
You are one uneducated dirt bag, you know nothing about history and the south using the term states rights to defend Jim crow, your spawners must have been as dumb as you
Click to expand...

Unlike you, fake veteran, I actually have an education and live in The South therefore know its history.
 
Jim Eagle said:
How ironic.

Re: The Nation, lol.
Click to expand...

You can hear that interview anywhere you want, so don't be a little bitch and ignore what the ideology you adhere to has always been...a collection of racist tropes and bullshit masquerading as serious thought.
 
LV426 said:
You can hear that interview anywhere you want, so don't be a little bitch and ignore what the ideology you adhere to has always been...a collection of racist tropes and bullshit masquerading as serious thought.
Click to expand...

nbra.info tells a different story.
 
Jim Eagle said:
nbra.info tells a different story.
Click to expand...

Really? How so? Does it alter the quote from Atwater at all? You didn't believe that "states rights" was a racist argument, but Atwater told you in his own words that it is.

So am I to believe him or you?
 
LV426 said:
Really? How so? Does it alter the quote from Atwater at all? You didn't believe that "states rights" was a racist argument, but Atwater told you in his own words that it is.

So am I to believe him or you?
Click to expand...

You pretend that Atwater speaks for the party. What about Buchanan?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top