Whomever
uscitizen alternate login
Yeah a few real pieces of work on here. And they are totally unaware of how they appear.
Liberal Bigotry
- Thread starter Dixie - In Memoriam
- Start date
Yeah a few real pieces of work on here. And they are totally unaware of how they appear.
ib1yysguy
Junior Member
That's the baffling bit. I don't understand how that's possible, but it almost certainly is the case that they had no idea how retarded they sound.
Dixie - In Memoriam
New member
There is really no telling how we appear to superficial stereotyping bigots who make all kinds of unfounded assumptions based on their personal prejudices. I agree with Southern Man (and ib1), I richly deserve what I get because I routinely pound that ass with truth and facts you can't refute. As for me being a racist, I know what is in my heart and that is all that really matters to me, you people can say whatever you like about me, it doesn't bother me a bit. You will notice, anytime some snot-nose punk calls me a racist, they never back it up with a quote or a link to where I posted something racist, it's always a gross misinterpretation of something they took out of context, or read someone else post about.
Bfgrn
New member
NO, it's not logic at all. It's defined as polarized thinking. Someone that sees everything as either black or white with no shades of gray...
It is rampant among right wing pea brains...
maineman
Banned
as I can recall, there was a ballot initiative in Alabama to remove the prohibition against mixed race marriages... and YOU voted against it...
and then gave all sorts of "reasons" why that vote was not bigoted at all.
ib1yysguy
Junior Member
oh my
Bfgrn
New member
Quote:
The strong Republican majority in congress overrode a veto from Democrat President Andrew Johnson for the first time in US history and passed the Civil Rights Act of 1868. The racist Johnson then refused to enforce it.
Republicans passed the Civil Rights act of 1875, which was struck down by the Democrat majority Supreme Court in 1883. Republicans tried again in 1957, watering down a Civil Rights Act to overcome stiff Democrat opposition. 1960 brought a third Republican Civil Rights Act, pushed through after nearly a week long Democrat filibuster.
President John Kennedy became the first Democratic President to embrace the conservative ideals of the Radical Republicans. Democratic President Lyndon Johnson, who himself grew up impoverished in the South, pushed his party further, and supported the Republican sponsored 1964 Civil Rights Act. This Act was essentially a re-writing of the 1875 legislation, and was passed against chief opponents Albert Gore Sr. and a 14 hour filibuster by former Klansman Robert Byrd, still a Democrat senator to this day. Johnson was instrumental in strengthening the Act in 1968.
***********************************
Today's political parties bear little resemblance to the parties of the later half of the 1800's that carried the label Republican and Democratic. The issue of blacks and segregation in this country have been historically divided by a line; the Mason Dixon line, not party lines...
The Civil Rights Act of 1957 - You mean the recommendations of President Truman's Civil Rights Committee that Eisenhower adopted from 1947?
Republican sponsored 1964 Civil Rights Act??? I didn't know liberals Jack Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson were Republicans... you learn something new every day!
To call progressive ideas like equal rights for blacks conservative ideals is beyond stupid... it is true pea brainism...LOL
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
Since you are the resident shit-poster of the board, I find your hollow proclamations to be hilarious.
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
1. Actually, the history shows the stubborn racism that exists as strong today in the Democrat Party, as I have so demonstrated.
2. The Mason-Dixon line was also the dividing line between parties, with huge GOP majorities in the North followed by huge Democrat majorities in the South.
3. Actually, the original draft of the 1957 bill was penned by Herbert Brownell, Eisenhower’s Attorney General. Brownell was former chairman of the RNC.
4. Kennedy’s version of the bill drafted in February 1963 was a watered down version of what the GOP had introduced one month previous. The actual 1964 Act was based on the 1875 Act, working around the Supreme Court’s decision in 1883 that found it violated the 14th Amendment. Chief sponsors were Republicans Everett Dirksen and Richard Nixon. Chief opposition were Democrats Sam Ervin, Al Gore Sr., and of course Robert Byrd, who filibustered for 14 hours. Final vote tallies in the House were 80% of Republicans and 63% of Democrats voting yes. In the Senate, 21 out of the 27 no votes were Democrats.
5. Modern Conservative revere the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. What part of “all Men are created equal” do you fail to understand?
christiefan915
Catalyst
maineman
Banned
talking about what happened in 1964 is not TODAY.
LAST YEAR, not 45 years ago, the Democratic Pary nominated an African American as it's candidate for President...
AND HE WON... BIG.
That's TODAY.
christiefan915
Catalyst
Going through your post line by line:
"...it occurred to me, liberals always tend to be bigoted in their views. Has anyone else noticed this trait? If you are talking about "Abortion" it's always poor women, they always require a choice to abort, and that is always the best possible scenario for them.... doesn't matter how many various circumstances surrounded the millions of abortions last year, they all follow the same template to a liberal.
"EVERY American is poor and can't afford it, and needs government to provide it for them, or they will simply get sick and die in the street. If it's about welfare, EVERY American is poor and downtrodden, and requires the government to support them, or they will starve to death homeless in the streets. If it's about the School Breakfast Program.... EVERY American is poor and can't afford to provide breakfast for their children, and if the government doesn't provide it, these people will just let their kids starve to death."
This one's the icing on the cake:
"In every instance, it is a Liberal Bigotry which causes the Liberal to paint an entire group of people with a broad brush, and stereotype the hell out of them, so they can pigeonhole them into their liberal agenda."
"Every aspect of Liberalism is cloaked in this insidious hidden BIGOTRY..."
"Every issue they support, is based and rooted in a bigoted view..."
"Never is a consideration given to the fact that each of us is an individual..."
"Because we all know, if you are a decent respectable person who loves and cares about your country, you have to spew liberal nonsense 24/7 and march in lockstep to the liberal agenda."
You've tried to excuse your fallacy in the first sentence by using "tend", but the rest of the post is loaded with absolutes like "always", "never", "all", and "24/7". You proceed to damn all liberals with a sweeping generalization, yet offer no concrete proof of your allegations.
So tell me, is this the part where you respond that "y'all are being punk'd"?
Do you not think by "liberals" that he means modern american self indentified liberals?
Classical Liberalism has been dead in the west since the advent of Marxism. Rarely have I heard in recent times anyone espousing classical liberalism?
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
You do realize that you are doing exactly what you proclaim the liberals always do?
are you a closet liberal dixie?
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
So you two WERE in the same class as kids?
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
Actually you are quite incorrect. It is most certainly not TODAY.
It was November, 4, 2008.
Friggin liberals... ALWAYS wrong.
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
As you so nicely pointed out earlier, TODAY the Democrat "Pary" has a much more effective tactic to subjugate the black man and destroy his family: abortion, teen sex, welfare and Affirmative Action.
maineman
Banned
OOOOO the spelling nazi.... what a powerful point you make when you do that!
I pointed out that you have not talked about the democratic PARTY in today's era with any degree of honesty or objectivity, preferring to spew the same tired old anti-black, anti-democratic rhetoric that your party has been spewing for decades.
Your low opinion of black americans is palpable... and they know it. They KNOW that you and your ilk believe that they are stupid enough and lazy enough to let anyone subjegate them and destroy their family.... and that is why you will never get them to vote for you until your party loses its racist tendencies. Sorry.
I have often posted that the only thing conservatives do is criticize liberals. The criticism exists outside of history and reality, but it serves the purpose of unifying a disparate band of anti-something. (fill in the something.)
Has anyone ever seen a thread that consisted of conservative accomplishments? There are none. Why? Because when all you do is oppose change there isn't a heck of a lot one can accomplish.
Liberals today are supposedly not like liberals in the 17th and 18th century, and that is true as times change, but they are still liberals because they still believe in a world in which freedom, fairness, and justice for all is possible.
So I give back to you from Reagan to Bush Jr conservative accomplishments: debt, war, increased poverty, stagnant wages, a proliferation of hostile nations, no energy policy, environmental spoilage, outsourcing of our jobs and our knowledge, and almost total economic collapse, and I ask again, what aside from criticizing liberals can they point to? Nada.
http://www.conceptualguerilla.com/?q=node/393
Has anyone ever seen a thread that consisted of conservative accomplishments? There are none. Why? Because when all you do is oppose change there isn't a heck of a lot one can accomplish.
Liberals today are supposedly not like liberals in the 17th and 18th century, and that is true as times change, but they are still liberals because they still believe in a world in which freedom, fairness, and justice for all is possible.
So I give back to you from Reagan to Bush Jr conservative accomplishments: debt, war, increased poverty, stagnant wages, a proliferation of hostile nations, no energy policy, environmental spoilage, outsourcing of our jobs and our knowledge, and almost total economic collapse, and I ask again, what aside from criticizing liberals can they point to? Nada.
http://www.conceptualguerilla.com/?q=node/393