Ah in other words, I cut off parts of your quote then I made another post with the full quote.
Into The Night, If Science Doesn't Use Supporting Evidence
- Thread starter AProudLefty
- Start date
Ah in other words, I cut off parts of your quote then I made another post with the full quote.
Yakuda
Verified User
I love how unhinged you people get when someone questions your religion. You swarm like rabid hare krishna's
BidenPresident
Verified User
I asked you a direct question. You failed to respond.
Yakuda
Verified User
Ah in other words, I cut off parts of your quote then I made another post with the full quote.
No you missed the very first words of post 9. I never went back to that fucking post. This is why I treat you cunts like the cunts you are. I never want to hear you fucking whiny not he's ever complain about it again. Subhuman cunts all of you.
Yakuda
Verified User
I don't work for you cunt face. Maybe your mother does but I don't. Lick me
BidenPresident
Verified User
Good. You make explicit that you're a troll.
"Not at all" is not a fucking answer, dumbass. And it matters not because you claimed that I "ignored" your first sentence.
So what is a "peer review" to you without the "leftist doctrine"?
gfm7175
Mega MAGA
Conflicting evidence.
Give an example of conflicting evidence.
gfm7175
Mega MAGA
Theory: All swans are white.
Null Hypothesis: Does a non-white swan exist?
Conflicting evidence: Looky there!! A black swan!!
That is called a hypothesis or premise, not a theory.