Rationing and long lines

Southern Man said:
LOL typical Liberal misunderstanding of basic modern economics. How does one person's wealth detract from others?
Click to expand...

Oh my God, that's so ignorant.

The first thing you learn about economics is the principle of scarcity. If you don't understand that principle, you have no room to come on here and complain about liberals misunderstanding economics.

Jesus, you are fucking retarded.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Wake up jackass! If the majority of the money is being spent making researchers millionaires, then HOW MUCH MONEY IS LEFT OVER FOR ALL THE MATERIALS AND SUCH THAT YOU JUST PREVIOUSLY LISTED? ...
Click to expand...


Southern Man said:
LOL typical Liberal misunderstanding of basic modern economics. How does one person's wealth detract from others?
Click to expand...

It's called an allotment, you willfully ignorant neocon parrot! Federal budgets, as well as private enterprise budgets, allot X amount of money for various projects. The budget INCLUDES various items...salary is one of them. So if a huge chunk of the budget is alloted for salaries, then everything else gets a smaller piece of the pie. It's just like your weekly salary.....you get a check and then you apply it to your budget...how much money alloted for groceries, how much for utility bills, how much for personal entertainment. These are basics for anyone who actually draws an salary and keeps a check book.....but evidently you need a refresher course in life 101.

Laugh that one off, chuckles.
 
Last edited:
ib1yysguy said:
Oh my God, that's so ignorant.

The first thing you learn about economics is the principle of scarcity. If you don't understand that principle, you have no room to come on here and complain about liberals misunderstanding economics.

Jesus, you are fucking retarded.
Click to expand...
Actually, the first thing that you learn in micro-economics is the theory of economic man, who has no limit to his ability to consume, hence no limit to his ability to gather wealth. You then learn in marco-economics that Peter's wealth has no negative effect on Paul's, in fact it likely has a positive effect.

And I'm not Jesus; He is my savior.

*shrug*
 
Southern Man said:
Actually, the first thing that you learn in micro-economics is the theory of economic man, who has no limit to his ability to consume, hence no limit to his ability to gather wealth. You then learn in marco-economics that Peter's wealth has no negative effect on Paul's, in fact it likely has a positive effect.

And I'm not Jesus; He is my savior.

*shrug*
Click to expand...


why do you continually refuse to abide by his directives?

70X7????
 
Demwit said:
Money/wealth is not a zero sum game but not far from it.
Click to expand...
True ask Bill Gates and his employees, as well as all the folks who work more efficiently, hence make more money, by using his products. Then go back to the 1920's and ask Henry Ford the same question, then back another generation and ask Carnegie.
 
Southern Man said:
Actually, the first thing that you learn in micro-economics is the theory of economic man, who has no limit to his ability to consume, hence no limit to his ability to gather wealth. You then learn in marco-economics that Peter's wealth has no negative effect on Paul's, in fact it likely has a positive effect.

And I'm not Jesus; He is my savior.

*shrug*
Click to expand...

So by your "logic" the defecit does not matter?
 
Southern Man said:
I'm sorry but I can't get past this obviously racist tone of yours. *shrug*
Click to expand...

Translation: Bravo couldn't fault my earlier response, so Southie tries (and fails miserably) to hide his defeat with an absurd accusation. For the life of me, I don't remember a racial definition of the words "neocon" or "parrot" in the dictionary.

Well, I've reduced this fool to babbling and the delusions of his self aggrandizing ramblings. He shrugs because, let's face it folks, he's just not that bright. For him to try and come to Bravo's rescue is indeed the blind leading the blind.

Say goodnight gracie, shows over for you.
 
Last edited:
Demwit said:
but you can always make more per your "logic".
Click to expand...
It's like a tax; the higher the percentage, the less incentive you have to work. With high interest payments consuming an inordinate amount of income, human nature eventually causes folks to "screw the man". *shrug*
 
Taichiliberal said:
Translation: Bravo couldn't fault my earlier response, so Southie tries (and fails miserably) to hide his defeat with an absurd accusation. For the life of me, I don't remember a racial definition of the words "neocon" or "parrot" in the dictionary.

Well, I've reduced this fool to babbling and the delusions of his self aggrandizing ramblings. He shrugs because, let's face it folks, he's just not that bright. For him to try and come to Bravo's rescue is indeed the blind leading the blind.

Say goodnight gracie, shows over for you.
Click to expand...

Neocon is a code word for Jew. *shrug*
 
Southern Man said:
Neocon is a code word for Jew. *shrug*
Click to expand...

What? Where did you hear that little gem?

And just so taichilib will understand, you need to read or research the definition of a word before you start tossing it around. Neocons are former lefties who moved to the center. In the 70s it was the militant anti-soviet folks who were fine with spending more on social programs than most classic conservatives and libertarians were comfortable with.

Sothernman certainly does not fit the bill as a neocon.
 
WinterBorn said:
Maybe if you stuck with actual sources and the historical significance of the term you might be correct more often.

If "neocon" is code for jews it is a well kept secret.
Click to expand...

"Neocons are former lefties who moved to the center." In other words, Jews. *shrug*

And you are right; The Southern Man is far, far, far from being a "neocon".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top