SmarterthanYou
rebel
Maybe people in the US should be shouting louder at the return of the obscene bonus culture which nearly brought the world to its knees and may do so again.
obscene bonus culture......before or after the 'bailout'?
Maybe people in the US should be shouting louder at the return of the obscene bonus culture which nearly brought the world to its knees and may do so again.
sorry, darla came up with spurt first![]()
Your exactly right, but It like saying you have a car and its a Yugo.
My tax cut didn't cause me to spend even $1 more.
No, you have.
ALL working people who receive a check pay taxes. Payroll taxes are taxes, and in many cases they exceed what the wealthy pay as a portion of their income.
Here you go, obfuscating again.![]()
Obama was brilliant and creative when he redefined the meaning of what a "tax cut" IS. Does that sound familiar? Not only was it disingenuous, but misleading as well.
obscene bonus culture......before or after the 'bailout'?
Here you go, obfuscating again.![]()
Obama was brilliant and creative when he redefined the meaning of what a "tax cut" IS. Does that sound familiar? Not only was it disingenuous, but misleading as well.
It takes a huge amount of spin for Dixie to try to argue that those making under $200K - in short, most Americans - hardly pay any taxes anyway.
What's all the hubbub about, then? Were the TEA people all millionaires?
Good call, once again Dix....
Dixie said most people under $200K pay no tax at all.
I guess he doesn't doesn't consider the cigarette tax to be as egregious as you do.
Anyhoo, Obama promised a tax cut for those under $200K, and delivered.
no, it's NOT a stupid question because I wanted to know if I should body slam you for calling bonuses from corporate capital money obscene or bonuses from tax payer funded loans obscene.That is a stupid question,
which indeed means you need to be slammed because it's corporate money, not my tax payer dollars.it was obscene before the bailout
this is the only thing you got right.and it is many times more obscene now after the bailout.
of course they do. so maybe the dems will get a spine for once and tell them 'not with taxpayer dollars.Goldman Sachs was saved from extinction by a $6 billion loan and now thinks it is back to business as usual as far as they are concerned.
whether it is or not, it's quite appropriate when debating with you.By the way, is your posting name meant to be ironic?
Dixie said most people under $200K pay no tax at all.
I guess he doesn't doesn't consider the cigarette tax to be as egregious as you do.
Anyhoo, Obama promised a tax cut for those under $200K, and delivered.
no, it's NOT a stupid question because I wanted to know if I should body slam you for calling bonuses from corporate capital money obscene or bonuses from tax payer funded loans obscene.
which indeed means you need to be slammed because it's corporate money, not my tax payer dollars.
this is the only thing you got right.
of course they do. so maybe the dems will get a spine for once and tell them 'not with taxpayer dollars.
whether it is or not, it's quite appropriate when debating with you.
Do you understand the meaning of a tautological statement?
No he didn't... and cigarette tax just went up, to the tune of about $6 a carton in my state. How is THAT a "decrease" in taxes?
No, you have.
ALL working people who receive a check pay taxes. Payroll taxes are taxes, and in many cases they exceed what the wealthy pay as a portion of their income.
First of all, people who make less than $200k, pay a very small fraction of the taxes. In fact, most of them pay no tax at all!
Dixie said most people under $200K pay no tax at all.
I guess he doesn't doesn't consider the cigarette tax to be as egregious as you do.
Anyhoo, Obama promised a tax cut for those under $200K, and delivered.