A great man gone

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cancel4
  • Start date Start date
An unbiased reporter probably doesn't exist.

And who is it that you think did editorials for decades of TV and far more years of newspapers? Do you think they had some guy off the street writing editorials for newspapers? Who do you think did them on tv for most of the time tv has been doing the news?

Stick with the your straw man claim. Its not any more accurate, but more entertaining.
Kindly point out where I claimed that one did, Solitary (the "entertaining" comment exposes you). Ideally it is editors who do editorials. Or pundits, commentators, (choose your term). Reporters, not so much. *shrug*
 
Kindly point out where I claimed that one did, Solitary (the "entertaining" comment exposes you). Ideally it is editors who do editorials. Or pundits, commentators, (choose your term). Reporters, not so much. *shrug*

So only Solitary ever called you entertaining? I kinda doubt that.


Your clinging to this "he shouldn't have done both" is just more of your inability to admit when you are wrong.

It shows your bias against anyone who has any liberal ideals.
 
So only Solitary ever called you entertaining? I kinda doubt that.


Your clinging to this "he shouldn't have done both" is just more of your inability to admit when you are wrong.

It shows your bias against anyone who has any liberal ideals.

Just one more coincidence, like: lives in Alabama, Red Tide fan, fond of the straw man tactic, follows me around stubbornly, repeats the same arguments over and over, three fat kids, ugly wife... *shrug*
 
A reporter should not editorialize. *shrug*
So does that mean they need to get rid of Fox News all together? Alls they do is editorialize.

Oh come on SM, that's a silly commnet. Journalist have made editorials as long as they've been around and it's healthy for our democracy too. Other wise all's were left with is state run propaganda. It's fine for a journalist to editorialize as long as they point our that their comments are editorials.
 
F*ck, I'm an idiot. Don't even remember writing that too you last night. I am coming back to Columbus in September for the Ohio State-USC game. I cannot wait!!!!

I was in Cincinnati for a wedding. There were some attractive women in Cinci. I liked the city.
You got tickets??!!! :O

Either you're very well connected, a huge OSU (or USC) fan or your loaded with jack. I have contacts in the scalping game and best they can do me is nose bleed seats at $200 a pop and they're doing me a favor. Street value is $300 for nose bleed and up.

Yea drop me a line when you're back in town and I'll stand you a Thurman Burger.
 
sweet, so when someone tells me i raised a strawman i can declare victory....now where is watermark
Me thinks that 1, there not using the correct definition of a strawman argument and 2, you know that.

A strawman argument is an argument that's missrepresents another persons point of view in order to make it easer to discredit that point of view (knock down the strawman).
 
Me thinks that 1, there not using the correct definition of a strawman argument and 2, you know that.

A strawman argument is an argument that's missrepresents another persons point of view in order to make it easer to discredit that point of view (knock down the strawman).

go take it up with charver
 
But he was only doing one at any given time. My argument still holds that unless you believe that news reporters have no opinion, you are calling Cronkite biased only because he expressed those opinions.

Cronkite was a professional newsman. He could certainly present a fair portrayal of the news when he was acting as the CBS evening news anchorman, and then present opinion (backed up with facts and experience) when he was speaking in his editorials.

The fact that you claim this shows bias but will not answer whether you think mainstream news reporters have an opinion is why I would claim victory (if I were to do so). Not based on something like you avoiding the topic by posting "straw man" over and over.
You have to understand the mindset of the right wing. Those who do not support their agenda are biased. By that standard any objective person is biased.
 
Just one more coincidence, like: lives in Alabama, Red Tide fan, fond of the straw man tactic, follows me around stubbornly, repeats the same arguments over and over, three fat kids, ugly wife... *shrug*

Yep, I live in Alabama. Yes I am a Crimson Tide fan. (red tide is an algae bloom in the ocean)

Straw man argument? None of my arguments were straw man arguments. That was just your way of avoiding the discussion.

You have never seen my wife or my kids. You want to scream about people talking about your family and here you make totally bogus accusations about mine.
 
So does that mean they need to get rid of Fox News all together? Alls they do is editorialize.

Oh come on SM, that's a silly commnet. Journalist have made editorials as long as they've been around and it's healthy for our democracy too. Other wise all's were left with is state run propaganda. It's fine for a journalist to editorialize as long as they point our that their comments are editorials.
Fox has been shown to be among the least biased of major cable and broadcast news outlets. I disagree that reporters should editorialize.
 
Yep, I live in Alabama. Yes I am a Crimson Tide fan. (red tide is an algae bloom in the ocean)

Straw man argument? None of my arguments were straw man arguments. That was just your way of avoiding the discussion.

You have never seen my wife or my kids. You want to scream about people talking about your family and here you make totally bogus accusations about mine.
Red Tide is a slap at your team Maybe its time to get the old Solitary out to the cold Yadkin. His fat kids and ugly wife can wait downstream for him, since straw men float. *shrug*
 
Its so easy to pwn you I shanll not bother. *shrug*

1011-1.png
 
Red Tide is a slap at your team Maybe its time to get the old Solitary out to the cold Yadkin. His fat kids and ugly wife can wait downstream for him, since straw men float. *shrug*

Still not going to discuss the topic?

Should I scream and rant about you trying to insult my family? Sorry, but you have not seen my wife or my kids. Blind attempts at provocation is just another diversion.
 
Still not going to discuss the topic?

Should I scream and rant about you trying to insult my family? Sorry, but you have not seen my wife or my kids. Blind attempts at provocation is just another diversion.
Wait- I insulted Solitary's family. Are you finally admitting your old persona?
 
Wait- I insulted Solitary's family. Are you finally admitting your old persona?

Why would I admit to something that is not true?

But you insist I am Solitary. So you are insulting a man's family while screaming about people talking bad about yours.
 
Back
Top