A great man gone

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cancel4
  • Start date Start date
Why would I admit to something that is not true?

But you insist I am Solitary. So you are insulting a man's family while screaming about people talking bad about yours.
I'm insulting Solitary's family since he already insulted mine. See the difference Mr. Straw Man? :pke:
 
I'm insulting Solitary's family since he already insulted mine. See the difference Mr. Straw Man? :pke:

And I am responding to the insults of continuing to call me a liar. See how that works?

I love watching you flail around for new direction when you have been shown up in a thread.
 
And I am responding to the insults of continuing to call me a liar. See how that works?

I love watching you flail around for new direction when you have been shown up in a thread.
You're admitting that you're Solitary again. :)

I realize that you hope and pray to "show me up" but that will not make it so. I've found your intellectual dishonesty with constant straw man arguments tedious so chose a new diversion for a while. *shrug*
 
You're admitting that you're Solitary again. :)

I realize that you hope and pray to "show me up" but that will not make it so. I've found your intellectual dishonesty with constant straw man arguments tedious so chose a new diversion for a while. *shrug*

I did not admit to being solitary. I responded to you calling me a liar. And that you have done.

Straw man? That has been your answer for every argument you could not counter.

Your dishonest debate style has been consistent, I will give you that. If you think you are winning you chastise those who do not respond. If you think you are losing you start with the "straw man" or "caricature" defense and do not address the topic again.

You are a fraud and a troll. That much has become more and more obvious.
 
I did not admit to being solitary. I responded to you calling me a liar. And that you have done.

Straw man? That has been your answer for every argument you could not counter.

Your dishonest debate style has been consistent, I will give you that. If you think you are winning you chastise those who do not respond. If you think you are losing you start with the "straw man" or "caricature" defense and do not address the topic again.

You are a fraud and a troll. That much has become more and more obvious.
Perhaps you should read up on your favorite logical fallacy, again:

Straw man. This is the fallacy of refuting a caricatured or extreme version of somebody's argument, rather than the actual argument they've made. Often this fallacy involves putting words into somebody's mouth by saying they've made arguments they haven't actually made, in which case the straw man argument is a veiled version of argumentum ad logicam. One example of a straw man argument would be to say, "Mr. Jones thinks that capitalism is good because everybody earns whatever wealth they have, but this is clearly false because many people just inherit their fortunes," when in fact Mr. Jones had not made the "earnings" argument and had instead argued, say, that capitalism gives most people an incentive to work and save. The fact that some arguments made for a policy are wrong does not imply that the policy itself is wrong.

In debate, strategic use of a straw man can be very effective. A carefully constructed straw man can sometimes entice an unsuspecting opponent into defending a silly argument that he would not have tried to defend otherwise. But this strategy only works if the straw man is not too different from the arguments your opponent has actually made, because a really outrageous straw man will be recognized as just that. The best straw man is not, in fact, a fallacy at all, but simply a logical extension or amplification of an argument your opponent has made.
http://www.csun.edu/~dgw61315/fallacies.html#Straw man
 
LOL Sore loser. :)

Just stating an opinion based on your post. You accused me of creating a straw man argument. I called you on using that to divert from the topic.

Now you claim that I accused myself of making a straw man argument?

I think "idiot" fits you quite well.
 
Just stating an opinion based on your post. You accused me of creating a straw man argument. I called you on using that to divert from the topic.

Now you claim that I accused myself of making a straw man argument?

I think "idiot" fits you quite well.
Post 106 little man. Read it and weep. LOL
 
Back
Top