Dearest Dixie

Cypress said:
I didn't see anything about race or skin color in there. Why did you and your fellow bible thumpers interpret that?


Dixie, stop lying. You one of those old testament fire and brimstone racists.

You're on record saying that if it were up to you, women who get abortions should be stoned to death. Your words. You're on record with that. Your personal opinion is that women should be murdered for having an abortion.

Stop hiding behind your sheets and just come out and admit that you are an adherent to all this bullshit OT racist and sexist crap.
Click to expand...

Again you misinterpreted something I said and took it out of context to insist I said something I did not say. You do this all the time, and everyone on this board with an ounce of honesty know you do it. So continue to spew your lies, that is all you are good for.
 
Dixie said:
Again you misinterpreted something I said and took it out of context to insist I said something I did not say. You do this all the time, and everyone on this board with an ounce of honesty know you do it. So continue to spew your lies, that is all you are good for.
Click to expand...


everyone who was there remembers you saying it.

You said, in your personal opinion, women who get abortions should be stoned to death, in accordance with biblical law.


Now, you expect me to believe you aren't a supporter, or at least sympathetic to religious oppossition to racial mixing?

Prohibitions on interracial mixing is tame compared to that. How hard is it to believe you support a religious ban on interracial marriage?
 
Dixie said:
You are asking me questions under the assumption that this is MY viewpoint, and it isn't! I've repeated that about 50 gazillion times so far! Go find someone who believes in fundamentalist religious interpretations of the Old Testament, and ask THEM the question, I have no idea!
Click to expand...

You were the one who said it was valid. Not me. If I think someone has a valid point, I'm able to articulate why its valid.

But not Dixie. You want to straddle the fence...."Oh....its a valid point"...."But I can't tell you why other than they say its from the bible".....

But thanks for validating my point. You have no idea what the fuck you're talking about.

If you can't substantiate their claims, don't defend them and certainly don't consider their view points "valid". Otherwise, be prepared to be called out on it, every time.
 
Whomever said:
The answer is simple. People often intrepret things differently to justify their viewpoints.
Click to expand...


right, so if one has an inherently racist point of view, one is going to go shopping in the bible to "interpret" some passages to justify one's racism.

Its self evident.
 
Cypress said:
everyone who was there remembers you saying it.

You said, in your personal opinion, women who get abortions should be stoned to death, in accordance with biblical law.


Now, you expect me to believe you aren't a supporter, or at least sympathetic to religious oppossition to racial mixing?

Prohibitions on interracial mixing is tame compared to that. How hard is it to believe you support a religious ban on interracial marriage?
Click to expand...

Nope, I didn't say it in the context you are presenting it. Sorry! You are a fucking nitwit LIAR! But you are welcome to continue spewing lies about people, it's what you do best!

I don't give two shits what you THINK I support! It means about as much to me as a bucket of warm spit. In fact, the bucket of warm spit actually means more to me than what you THINK you heard me say!
 
LadyT said:
You were the one who said it was valid. Not me. If I think someone has a valid point, I'm able to articulate why its valid.

But not Dixie. You want to straddle the fence...."Oh....its a valid point"...."But I can't tell you why other than they say its from the bible".....

But thanks for validating my point. You have no idea what the fuck you're talking about.

If you can't substantiate their claims, don't defend them and certainly don't consider their view points "valid". Otherwise, be prepared to be called out on it, every time.
Click to expand...

No, I didn't say it was valid, I said they have a valid religious viewpoint that is not rooted in racist philosophy, and you haven't disproved that. I am sorry you misinterpreted what was said, but I can't do anything about your incompetence or reading comprehension problem.
 
Dixie said:
Nope, I didn't say it in the context you are presenting it. Sorry! You are a fucking nitwit LIAR! But you are welcome to continue spewing lies about people, it's what you do best!

I don't give two shits what you THINK I support! It means about as much to me as a bucket of warm spit. In fact, the bucket of warm spit actually means more to me than what you THINK you heard me say!
Click to expand...


LOL!
 
Dixie said:
Nope, I didn't say it in the context you are presenting it. Sorry! You are a fucking nitwit LIAR! But you are welcome to continue spewing lies about people, it's what you do best!

I don't give two shits what you THINK I support! It means about as much to me as a bucket of warm spit. In fact, the bucket of warm spit actually means more to me than what you THINK you heard me say!
Click to expand...

Oh! Cypress said it in the wrong context......well, why didn't you say so. Why don't you do the board a favor and elaborate and explain to us the context in which you said stoning women to death was the right thing to do?
 
Dixie said:
No, I didn't say it was valid, I said they have a valid religious viewpoint that is not rooted in racist philosophy, and you haven't disproved that. I am sorry you misinterpreted what was said, but I can't do anything about your incompetence or reading comprehension problem.
Click to expand...

haha!

No, that's what you said the third or fourth time.
 
Dixie said:
First of all, I have not supported ANY viewpoint. I only maintained that a religious viewpoint (which I do not personally hold) regarding interracial marriage is not racist, and you've not demonstrated how it is. No, you've just gone on to insist this is not debatable and you are right and I am wrong, end of discussion. You have to show me where the religious viewpoint is rooted in sentiments of racial superiority, inferiority, or discrimination by race in any way. If you can't show me that, you haven't proven it is a "racist" viewpoint. You may disagree with the viewpoint, as do I, but claiming it is something it is not, is invalid.

As for your other absurd part to the ridiculous question, I don't believe a moral argument can be made for murdering people, regardless of why it is being done. If such a thing were happening in the name of religious beliefs, I would denounce it, as I have done with the Taliban and radical Islamic fundamentalists.

Hope that answers you idiotic question and you can now move on with your pathetic life.
Click to expand...

ummm.... Dixie, it matters not if a viewpoint is held by a religious organization. If it is based on race, it is inherently RACIST. It being a religious view does not change that. They are entitled to hold such views as they are guaranteed freedom of religion. But that does not change the fact that such views are racist.

Just as the views held by religious organizations that say 'gay marriage is bad/evil/burn in hell' is bigoted. They have every right to hold that view. But they are still bigoted.
 
Cypress said:
Dixie, I've come to the conclusion that if you're not a closet racist, you are a racist enabler. Which is just as fucking bad. I don't have a single doubt anymore that your adult life has been willingly surrounded by the racist mythology and the arguments and logic of neoconfederates.

if you think its merely a matter of "disagreement" that some pretzel logic interpretation of the bible is racist or not, then piss off.

I'm glad I brought up your interracial pretzel bible logic. I'd rather see the racist enablers out in the open, than hiding in the shadows. Cheers!
Click to expand...

says the closet homophobe and gay basher.
 
LadyT said:
#1) you still have failed to mention where specifically in the bible it mentions race. How a bunch of inbred southern rednecks came to the conclusion it meant that people shouldn't "mix" races (i.e. DISCRIMINATE AGAINST WHO THEY SHOULD PROCREATE WITH) is still a mystery to me. How you think that this conclusion is some how "valid" ( your words not mine) show's you support. I'm just curious how you feel so comfortable with this view point. I'm not shocked considering the fact that you think what Kilmeade said was acceptable.



Ok. I just wanted to make sure that I understood that what you're in fact saying is that you think segregationist interpretations are valid and that you just arbitrarily brush aside the other religious interpretations in favor of logic and reason. That's all. I just wanted to make sure I understood your inconsistencies. I can get on with my life. Thanks for clarifying.
Click to expand...

as if only southern folk believe in non interracial marriages :rolleyes:

no surprise you pick on them though
 
Dixie, I've come to the conclusion that if you're not a closet racist, you are a racist enabler. Which is just as fucking bad.
Click to expand...

It is actually people like you and Lady T who enable real racists, because you are busy focusing on things that aren't racist, while ignoring the real racists.
 
Just Plain Politics! - View Single Post - "We keep marrying other species and ethnics " - Fox News Host

Dixie last week said:
"You fucking nitwit! People's religious viewpoints ARE valid according to the 1st Amendment of the fucking Constitution, go read it for yourself! If people religiously believe that God doesn't condone interracial marriage, that is between them and God, and it's NOT my business, nor is it indicative of a RACIST viewpoint
Click to expand...


DIXE THIS WEEK said:
No, I didn't say it was valid, I said they have a valid religious viewpoint that is not rooted in racist philosophy, and you haven't disproved that.
Click to expand...

Dixie = Sammy Davis Jr.
 
Dixie said:
It is actually people like you and Lady T who enable real racists, because you are busy focusing on things that aren't racist, while ignoring the real racists.
Click to expand...

LMAO.


yeah, b/c everyone knows how tolerant we are of racists.
 
Superfreak said:
ummm.... Dixie, it matters not if a viewpoint is held by a religious organization. If it is based on race, it is inherently RACIST. It being a religious view does not change that. They are entitled to hold such views as they are guaranteed freedom of religion. But that does not change the fact that such views are racist.

Just as the views held by religious organizations that say 'gay marriage is bad/evil/burn in hell' is bigoted. They have every right to hold that view. But they are still bigoted.
Click to expand...

:inno: On the one hand I want to QFT

:burn: On the other you're my arch conservative enemy and I feel I should insult you....what to do....what to do.....
 
LadyT said:
LMAO.


yeah, b/c everyone knows how tolerant we are of racists.
Click to expand...

What? Are you just going to repost your fucking lies in EVERY thread now? I gotta go around the board chasing down and refuting your absolute distorted lies and misrepresentations? Fuck you! Go to hell, bitch! I never said what you claimed I said, I never implied what you claimed I implied, and you can't make a valid point, so you resort to acting like a fucktard about it!

Go educate yourself, you stupid pathetic bitch! I'm done talking to your ignorant ass!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top