In Light of the Rittenhouse Verdict... A Question

JPF

Verified User
In the event of a shoot out between two armed people...both can now claim self defense right?
 
He didn't mention Rittenhouse's name.

So it’s always been the way you describe in the OP. The burden of proof is on the survivor. Maybe?

I’m pretty sure if you go into a bar and “pick a fight” there will be witnesses naming you as the aggressor.
 
The thread title:

In Light of the Rittenhouse Verdict... A Question

BP-“You can go into a bar and start a fight. Then kill that person in self defense.”

Obvious, right?
 
In the event of a shoot out between two armed people...both can now claim self defense right?

WRONG. If someone is provoking, ie. points at you first, then YOU have the right of defense, not the one provoking.

Why is this so hard for the left to comprehend?
 
...and you can go anywhere and slaughter blacks for any reason or none at all. It's in the second amendment.

Absurdity; the last desperate refuge for the ignorant, the dishonest and the stupid. Yay you!

dumb cunt
An extremely stupid person.
:palm:
 
Back
Top