Democrats quietly admit everything they told us about COVID was a lie

[Hawkeye10]

Peer review is meaningless. Science does not use consensus. There is no voting bloc in science.

Bret and Heather say that peer review has become a system which silences dissidents, where leaders in the field squash those who challenge their work and beliefs, it does the reverse of what was intended.

 

[Into the Night]

Bret and Heather say that peer review has become a system to silence dissidents, where leaders in the field squash those who challenge their work and beliefs.

Makes no difference to science. There is no peer review, voting bloc, or consensus of any kind in science. Science is not 'leaders', work, or beliefs. It is not any scientist or group of scientists. It is not people at all. It has no politics or religion.

Science is just a set of falsifiable theories. No more. No less. That's it. That's all.

There is no theory about covid19. Either the virus exists or it doesn't. Microbiology and electron microscopes can easily show the virus exists. While evidence points to it's origin being a lab in China, that is not a proof.

Science is an open functional system. There are no proofs in science. It is not possible to prove any theory True.

 

[Hawkeye10]

Makes no difference to science. There is no peer review, voting bloc, or consensus of any kind in science. Science is not 'leaders', work, or beliefs. It is not any scientist or group of scientists. It is not people at all. It has no politics or religion.

Science is just a set of falsifiable theories. No more. No less. That's it. That's all.

There is no theory about covid19. Either the virus exists or it doesn't. Microbiology and electron microscopes can easily show the virus exists. While evidence points to it's origin being a lab in China, that is not a proof.

Science is an open functional system. There are no proofs in science. It is not possible to prove any theory True.

Do you live in the real world? Corrupted peer review has greatly harmed the practice of science, and thus harmed all of us.

 

[Into the Night]

I picked an easy example so you can understand. Plus I don't want to go through individual points.

BTW, since you used the NY Post as a source, you might as well use The Examiner as a source.

Void topic.

 

[Althea]

Is this Legion?

LOL. I don't think so. I don't see him on my ignore list.

 

[Into the Night]

"Damning" evidence "strongly" suggests that COVID-19 is a man-made "monster".

That isn't even suggested in the original source.

Which means you are arguing a straw man.
That's a fallacy, dude.

 

[Althea]

Then why is big pharma forcing peer reviewed papers to be removed from the net? That was unheard of until a virus was made in a lab.

LMFAO

There are no 'peer reviewed papers'.

 

[Into the Night]

The "man-made" thing is how I separate the concerned and the Looney Tunes.

Notice that they often, if ever, suggest what needs to be done. Should we nuke Beijing? Send a strongly worded letter to the CEO of Walmart?

Random phrases. No apparent coherency.
You're getting worse, dude.

 

[Althea]

That cloth masks do jack shit against virus particles..

What about real masks?

 

[Into the Night]

The other Looney Tune theory is that it was "released", which is an act of war.

An act of war on themselves??

 

[goat]

LMFAO

There are no 'peer reviewed papers'.

There are quite a few peer reviewed papers on covid and its treatment. There's one coming out on vitamin D.

 

[Into the Night]

No, they are not. An intelligent person makes a number of assessments when determining the veracity of source. (Sorry for the big word, there, just google it). Is this a news article or an opinion piece? Are factual statements cross referenced? Does the source have a history of bias? Do they adhere to journalistic ethics? All of those things are completely relevant. You blow past them. That's your problem. Sources like Gateway Pundit, Breitbart, OAN, etc. are the boys who cried wolf. Whether what they report is factual or not is irrelevant, they have established they are not reputable sources.

I listen to experts because I am not an expert on all topics. Neither is a short order fry cook. Or an anonymous guy on the internet, or your Uncle on Facebook. Most of this idiotic anti vax covid nonsense can be debunked in fifteen seconds. The fact that you don't consider the source speaks volumes about your intelligence level.

'Expert' worship. Void authority fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Turn off msnbc and read a dozen peer reviewed papers on covid.

Why trade one source of gunk for another?

 

[Into the Night]

He thinks the medical profession is a political organization composed of Democrats.

Fauci is a Democrat, dude. So is Leanne Wen. So is Joe Biden. Science is not a 'profession', organization, academy, society, or any other political group.

 

[Into the Night]

Basically misleading as to all is his idea that a comment by a single Democrat constitutes "acknowledgement" by the Democratic Party,

Joe Biden is the leader of the Democrat party. The comments listed were all made by Democrats.

and by the medical profession as well,

No comments were listed by 'the medical profession', whatever THAT is!

I guess, since he quotes from that profession.

He doesn't.

Also misleading is his use of the word, "lie", worse than misleading since it is wrong on its face - see if you can figure out why, not that hard.

Semantics fallacy.

Also misleading are comments such as vaccines are not "effective" against... Effective
is a comparative term but the poster seems to think it's an absolute term.

'Effective' is a binary term. Semantics fallacy.

Most Democrats I know, and all medical professionals I've heard on the subject, say vaccines are effective against all the viruses;

Argument of ignorance fallacy. Attempted proof by consensus. Attempted proof by void. Compositional error fallacy.

with Omicron less so but the deficit can be made up by using better masks or doubling up with ordinary masks.

Paradox M.

His post, by and large, is a piece of shit.

Inversion fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

The medical industry is basically drug pushers for big pharma.

So...surgeons are 'drug pushers', eh?
A medical exam is 'pushing drugs', eh?
A drug test is 'pushing drugs', eh?
Getting a tooth filling or contact lenses for your eyes is 'pushing drugs', eh?
A radiologist is 'pushing drugs', eh? They can't even prescribe drugs!
Neither can an orderly. Neither can a nurse.

People that make heart monitors are not pushing drugs.
People that make catheters are not pushing drugs.
People that make PACS systems are not pushing drugs.

Bigotry.

 

[Into the Night]

Sorry you can't keep it up. Try this then. How would a post go over with you stumble bums that declared, "Republicans Admit Stolen Election is a Lie", quoting Liz Cheney.

Ignore it.

 

[Into the Night]

Already covered 2 points in the OP. Go back and read through the thread.

Lie. You have covered nothing.

 

[Into the Night]

It does prove you are a f**king idiot that is nothing but a right wing toady for the simple minded. In your world of useless idiots it is not enough that over 800,000 of your fellow Americans have died in large part due to the lies of trump, and your masters. You wish to continue the trend as long as you can blame others for the crisis.

But tell us you low IQ trash, what is there about changing information that you do not understand, nor have the ability to do so?

Insults and random phrases. No apparent coherency. Argument from randU fallacy. Stop quoting made up numbers.

 

[Into the Night]

Nazis?

That is what he said, dumbass. You can't read or something?

Do you know this fat cocksucker? He was hitting on some guys in PM. Watch your junk.

You are hallucinating again. EVERYONE is a sock to you.