Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
LMAO.... yes you idiot... like I said, you caught me... you found the one RIGHT leaning union guy who supports the Democrats plan and beats on conservative black guys who are against the Dems.
Figures... Leftists Hurl Racist Insults at Black Man After Horrible Beating
- Thread starter meme
- Start date
LMAO.... yes you idiot... like I said, you caught me... you found the one RIGHT leaning union guy who supports the Democrats plan and beats on conservative black guys who are against the Dems.
Socrtease
Verified User
Union members out providing protection for Dems at townhall meetings touting the greatness of the Obama healthcare program are not leftist? Ok then. He was a rightwing Palin supporter who went out on his free time to protect people who he doesn't agree with and beat up those that he does agree with. Clear as frosted glass that one is.
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
come on now, give BAC credit. He thinks he found a right leaning union member that still supports the Democrats and beats on conservatives. You know how crazy right wingers are... that is how they roll.
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
hush now... u just stoopid...
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
This reinforces The Southern Man's long-held assertion:
1. The Democrat Party is the racist Party;
2. Black Liberals are beholden to their former slave masters.
1. The Democrat Party is the racist Party;
2. Black Liberals are beholden to their former slave masters.
meme
New member
and conservative blacks are not worth squat by the like of Sharpton or a Beer with "the Hugo, cuase as we all know, he done went and stepped of the Democrat plantation..
Socrtease
Verified User
Conservative blacks still vote for Dems. You look at the last election and see that Black voters voted largely for Obama in California and ALSO voted almost 7 in 10 for Prop 8 which banned gay marriage. So even conservative, religious black voters vote for Democrats.
Republicans cannot keep ignoring forums like the NAACP and expect that to change either.
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
As a matter of fact I have .. and it doesn't escape me why you fail to recognize the all-too fucking obvious.
ONE so-called "union thug" does not equal "leftists."
How about "One Union Thug Hurls Insults at Black Man."
Is honesty a problem here?
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
It won't make the slightest difference as long as their policies remain the same .. which ain't going to happen .. so they might as well keep ignoring them.
Yes, I think honesty is a problem here. It takes denial of any sort of reason to attempt to make us believe that this guy was a right winger.
Witnesses say he was attacked by more than one and it is clear the whole incident was not caught on video. It's easy to deny when the political lean is different, but this wasn't something that should be brushed off so easily because you want to deny what is the most likely answer.
I don't believe you are actually responding to the substance of BAC's position.
Here's a hint: BAC is not claiming that the alleged attacked was a right-winger.
Instead he tries to deny he was a left-winger out to support the political ideation that he and his fellow members were there to protect, the reasonable person can figure out the political ideation of somebody willing to kick somebody's butt over this by the political ideation of the attacked. The attempt to deny what he is, is simply rejected.
This from one of the pack that tells us Rush Limbaugh, or Hannity, or O'Reilly speaks for all Conservatives....your hypocrite cap is showing, dude...
It just may be you that is seriously stupid....
You are as aware as I am that your messiah called in the union thugs personally
Here's another hint: BAC is not denying that the person is likely to hold left-wing political views or to be a "leftist."
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
I was responding to this idiocy from BAC...
Originally Posted by blackascoal View Post
"And you have it on good information that the "union thug" was a leftist?
"
One "Union thug" equals leftists?
You people are seriously stupid."
Please explain what he meant by the bolded above.... if not an attempt to pretend the union thug wasn't a leftist.... do tell.
Here is a hint: The idea that thugs that come to protect this ideation from the awful incursion of information from a different point of view aren't leftists is rejected. His, "Union thugs automatically mean leftists" questions is an attempt to deny what they are so that he can put the fault on "the enemy."
He was trying to deny that these people who attacked the guy were lefties, and I will continue to push reality back into this. These people were there to protect their precious ideation from the fearful "onslaught of information."
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
YOU are the one who attempted to pluralize this in a vain strawman attempt.
I stated THIS guy was a leftist. To which you responded first that 'do you have evidence he was a leftist'. THEN you made a subsequent comment that one union thug does not equal LEFTISTS. You are the only one that tried to pluralize it.
So YES, your lack of honesty is indeed a problem.
No one was talking to you, hotshot. Damocles responded to a different post and I was responding to him. If you want to ask BAC what he meant by that feel free. Damocles and I are discussing a different matter, specifically, BAC's other point that he made several times now that one person is not "the left" or "leftists."
And I love that you guys are hitching your wagon to this guy's claim that he was beat up by "union thugs." Next thing you know it will be revealed that he carved a "B" into his own cheek.
No, we aren't in any other conversation, sad attempt to dodge away from uncomfortable questions. You are attempting to tell me what BAC was saying, and he is asking about that as well. You aren't the conversation police, especially with public conversations like this one that anybody can participate in.
Anyway, nobody "automatically" assumed that people were leftists, there are reasons one makes that conclusion.
1. They are part of the union horde bused in to protect their ideation from that fabled "onslaught."
2. There were more than one of them according to eye witness reports.
3. While one clearly showed a bit of racism, it didn't change what he was there for or why.
It isn't a hard conclusion to come to. The conclusion was reached because of who they were, why there were there, what they were willing to do to meet that goal, and lastly who they attacked.