Are any facts disputed?
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
Teflon Don
I'm back baby
I dispute all of the facts
Those aren't facts; they are lie filled innuendo and hyperbole. If you weren't such a dishonest partisan hack, you would know the difference.
Witnesses to what? They keep calling these people witnesses; what did the witness??? Do you understand how stupid you look?
There is only one sense in which any fact is disputed here, by mere thoughtless gainsaying.
Not quite as bad is the claim of insufficient proof of facts because Trump did not say:
"I will release the money if you announce an investigation of Burisma and Biden"
Instead it is known he said "You aren't doing enough, reciprocating ...and I want you to do us a favor. Investigate Burisma server, Biden yada yada"
I'm not sure there is a ray of light between those two, but that's what they are hanging their hat on.
And of course that slit is sealed when you take the sondland testimony, Taylor Testimony and Bolten statements that it was a drug deal and everyone was in on it and it was an understood quid pro quo.
Not quite as bad is the claim of insufficient proof of facts because Trump did not say:
"I will release the money if you announce an investigation of Burisma and Biden"
Instead it is known he said "You aren't doing enough, reciprocating ...and I want you to do us a favor. Investigate Burisma server, Biden yada yada"
I'm not sure there is a ray of light between those two, but that's what they are hanging their hat on.
And of course that slit is sealed when you take the sondland testimony, Taylor Testimony and Bolten statements that it was a drug deal and everyone was in on it and it was an understood quid pro quo.
He never said that. Why all the lies? Are you a minie-me Schiff?
He never said that. Why all the lies? Are you a minie-me Schiff?
I am quite sure a ray of light would shine from ear to ear on you. There is nothing between them to stop it.
jimmymccready
Verified User
Your comments demonstrate you are deliberately stupid as to what the phrase means.
christiefan915
Catalyst
Jarod on this thread:
floridafan
Verified User
I think you have gone desperate. Have you personally seen anything that would indicate impeachment is being abandoned. No, its full speed ahead
christiefan915
Catalyst
I'm not following. Earl said that Adam Schiff was undecided about voting for impeachment and cited something called "buzzsprout.com" as his source. So I looked it up and it was just a podcaster's opinion with no source to Schiff. So IMO Earl was spouting B.S.
[h=2]Tim Pool Daily Show[/h] [h=1]Democrats Have Started ABANDONING Impeachment, Even Adam Schiff Says He Is Not Sure[/h] November 26, 2019 Season 1 Episode 191
jimmymccready
Verified User
Earl is following some dude's opinion is all.
christiefan915
Catalyst
Yeah, and pretending it's a fact.
And I was. Surprised that is.
Trump tried to extort Zelensky to investigate Bidens. It was at election time and such an announcement would have helped Daffy. Our elections have been quite close for a long time. It may have put the crook over the line. That is why Putin made Trump president and Trump had to pay him back. It is possible for an outsider to sway our elections. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/25/tru...ook-into-biden-and-his-son-in-phone-call.html
Do you ever read threads or should we just assume you are perpetually ignorant and incapable of actually participating in a conversation that isn't just you making a speech? Your post I quoted here is literally right under the post I quoted from me below. It was literally the last post in the thread, not difficult to find, not hidden...