Are any facts disputed?

Jarod said:
Maybe, but I think that would harm the Democrats more than impeaching. I do not pretend that the Democrats are not as self interested as the Republicans. I just happen to believe Trumps behavior should not go unchecked.

I think you are wrong and will avoid admitting it after its clear.
Click to expand...

How would it harm them? Will you stay home if Nancy doesn’t vote?

Of course not

She will come up with some lame excuse and you will declare her brilliant and wise.
 
Teflon Don said:
How would it harm them? Will you stay home if Nancy doesn’t vote?

Of course not

She will come up with some lame excuse and you will declare her brilliant and wise.
Click to expand...

There wold be plenty who would say, "Whats the point of voting."
 
Jarod said:
Maybe, but I think that would harm the Democrats more than impeaching. I do not pretend that the Democrats are not as self interested as the Republicans. I just happen to believe Trumps behavior should not go unchecked.

I think you are wrong and will avoid admitting it after its clear.
Click to expand...
nah. I just made a prediction. If I'm wrong then, as I said, I will be surprised. Not ashamed, surprised.
 
Jarod said:
And you will refuse to admit it, I've watched you for a long time.
Click to expand...

Ok. If you say so. I think you don't remember the simplest thing about me and stuff like this just proves it. You probably think I've "defended" somebody or something simply because I said this. None of that matters. I will be surprised (I said "amazed"). That is it.
 
Earl said:
‘They want to raise your taxes, the Democrats do, restore crippling regulations, shut down your new steel mills, take away your health care, and put illegal aliens before American citizens," Trump said in a closing rally in Indiana on Monday. "If you want more caravans, if you want more crime, vote Democrat tomorrow."
President Trump

He’s right.
Click to expand...

Trump, the pathological liar.

:rofl2:
 
dukkha said:
read the fucking Constitution. Impeach requires a criminal charge,, all the rest of this is fluff for their bullshit.

Nobody gives a damn about this - but it is hurting the Dems in battleground states -so have at the Nadler Narrative
Click to expand...

^Another RW idiot ignorant of the Constitution.

Why is that so common? Is it their collective stupidity?
 
dukkha said:
read your link,, Graham isn't an Oracle either, Bettr yet read the Constituitional text
~~

Susan Low Bloch, a constitutional law professor at the Georgetown University Law Center, agreed that the record did suggest that Clinton had lied under oath, which could constitute an impeachable offense. But she wasn’t impressed with Graham’s explanation.

First of all, Bloch said, “impeachment isn’t about ‘cleansing the office.’ That’s what an election is for.
Impeachment (in the House) and conviction (in the Senate) is about removing someone who has committed high crimes and misdemeanors. Impeachment is not just a way to attach a scarlet letter to an officer who behaved badly.”
Click to expand...

^Obviously ignorant of what “high crimes and misdemeanors” means.

Dumbfuck.
 
Jarod said:
Here we go...
Does anyone disagree that Rudy, at Trumps direction, told Ukraine that they would not get their money unless they announced on CNN an investigation into Joe Biden?
That at no time did Trump ask to have any corruption not related to electoral politics investigated?
Are there any facts in dispute?
Click to expand...

LINK? Are there any facts to support your lie filled hyperbole?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top