Are any facts disputed?

I don't think he was necessarily "focusing" on Hunter Biden... It sounded to me, and I heard the actual phone call as I hope you did, it was more like, and while you're at it.

Have you heard a logical explanation why Hunter got the job? please share

read this article from 2015

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/09/...-ukraine-joe-biden-son-hunter-biden-ties.html

You heard the actual phone call? I heard a summary was released, and I read that, but, no I have not heard a tape of the phone call. Please let me know where I can find an audio of the call itself, that would be huge.
 
THere is a lot of evidence Rudy was involved in huge Ukrainian corruption, has Trump ever expressed concern about that?
 
I don't think he was necessarily "focusing" on Hunter Biden... It sounded to me, and I heard the actual phone call as I hope you did, it was more like, and while you're at it.

Have you heard a logical explanation why Hunter got the job? please share

read this article from 2015

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/09/...-ukraine-joe-biden-son-hunter-biden-ties.html

Zelensky: I would also like to thank you for your great support in the area of defense. We are ready to continue to cooperate for the next steps, specifically we are almost ready to buy more Javelins from the United States for defense purposes....

Drumpf: I would like you to do us a favor though

That is not a "By The Way"... Its, "I Need a Favor Though". Significant difference.
 
Zelensky: I would also like to thank you for your great support in the area of defense. We are ready to continue to cooperate for the next steps, specifically we are almost ready to buy more Javelins from the United States for defense purposes....

Drumpf: I would like you to do us a favor though

That is not a "By The Way"... Its, "I Need a Favor Though". Significant difference.

I don't see how you separate favor from asking for an investigation into corruption

and Hunter Biden was just so obvious,
the VP's son lands a lucrative job as a board member at an oil firm in a foreign country?
And Joe Biden is on camera asking the man prosecuting corruption at the oil firm be fired or no aid money... his exact words

wouldn't be prudent to not want to look into that one, no?
 
Zelensky: I would also like to thank you for your great support in the area of defense. We are ready to continue to cooperate for the next steps, specifically we are almost ready to buy more Javelins from the United States for defense purposes....

Drumpf: I would like you to do us a favor though

That is not a "By The Way"... Its, "I Need a Favor Though". Significant difference.

Since Zelensky has denied pressure, twice now, he apparently didn’t interpret ‘favor’ that way.

I didn’t either.
 
I don't see how you separate favor from asking for an investigation into corruption

and Hunter Biden was just so obvious,
the VP's son lands a lucrative job as a board member at an oil firm in a foreign country?
And Joe Biden is on camera asking the man prosecuting corruption at the oil firm be fired or no aid money... his exact words

wouldn't be prudent to not want to look into that one, no?

I don’t get the confusion about it lol.

The word ‘favor’ is most commonly used as a polite form of speech. You don’t ‘politely’ pressure someone unless you’re using ‘favor’ sarcastically. And there was no evidence of sarcasm anywhere else in the transcript. Trump basically gave *a litany of things* the US has done for Ukraine and followed by politely asking for some investigations as a ‘favor’——*in return* for what has been done for your country.

Sort of like ‘we’ve done this for you, so can you do this for us this favor’. That’s literally all there is to it. It’s no wonder Zelensky was unaware of any pressure—THERE WASN’T ANY!
 
What I keep coming back to is the constant reference by Democrats, both witnesses and committee members alike that the crux of their argument is that he was abusing his power to gain an advantage for the 2020 election, by having his "potential" political opponent investigated.

If in fact this "potential" political opponent, happened to have a son being paid 50k / per mnth by a corrupt oil company in a foreign country, with no obvious qualifications, and certainly sane individuals would like to know the answer as to why, when after all Dad was the VP at the time..duhhh
Does this automatically make it wrong to ask, in other words does this cover Joe Biden from scrutiny BECAUSE he is a "potential" political opponent?

And secondly, but related, what if this person, and his son were not a "potential" political opponent. Was trump asking for an investigation still bribery and high crimes?
Precisely.
 
Zelensky: I would also like to thank you for your great support in the area of defense. We are ready to continue to cooperate for the next steps, specifically we are almost ready to buy more Javelins from the United States for defense purposes....

Drumpf: I would like you to do us a favor though

That is not a "By The Way"... Its, "I Need a Favor Though". Significant difference.

FAVOR (noun)
an act of kindness beyond what is due or usual.


Any questions?
 
FAVOR (noun)
an act of kindness beyond what is due or usual.


Any questions?

Exactly..

"Dude, I need that money Congress appropriated."

"I'm going to need an act of kindness beyond what is due or usual, though."
 
Exactly..

"Dude, I need that money Congress appropriated."

"I'm going to need an act of kindness beyond what is due or usual, though."

beyond what is due

It is clearly not a request to exchange anything, Dumbass. :dunno:
 
jarod, are you witness to todays hearing?

please tell me you believe these "professors" are doing great harm tot he Democrats case, by their mere attitudes and presence
 
In order for America to move on from this scandal, a precedent must be established now at this time.

Either it is acceptable to Americans to have a president abuse the powers of the president, extort other foreign government leaders, while witholding funds approved by Congress and paid for by the taxpayers, to be used as ransom- OR IT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE.

If there is no recourse- future presidents including this one will attempt to do it again and again.

Since bribary and extortion are crimes, and a president cannot be indicted for crimes while in office, the only recourse allowed by the Constitution is IMPEACHMENT.

IMPEACHMENT will set a precedent and is a win/win for both parties. As Republicans don't want future Democrat presidents to be allowed to do this, and Democrats do not want Republican presidents to do this- and we have a current Republican President that will do this over and over again if he is not held accountable for doing it in the first place.
 
Last edited:
In order for America to move on from this scandal, a precedent must be established now at this time.

Either it is acceptable to Americans to have a president abuse the powers of the president, extort other government leaders, while witholding funds approved by Congress and paid for by the taxpayers, to be used as ransom- OR IT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE.

If there is no recourse- future presidents including this one will attempt to do it again and again.

Since bribary and extortion are crimes, and a president cannot be indicted for crimes while in office, the only recourse allowed by the Constitution is IMPEACHMENT.

IMPEACHMENT is a win/win for both parties. As Republicans don't want future Democrat presidents to be allowed to do this, and Democrats do not want Republican presidents to do this- and we have a current Republican President that will do this over and over again if he is not held accountable for doing it in the first place.

aid was never withheld, so go blow yourself.
 
Not one member of the GOP is disputing the facts that Trump abused power, obstructed justice or used bribery and extortion for his own political gain. All they are doing is giving dumbass grandstanding mini-speeches that are nonsensical and worthless.
 
Not one member of the GOP is disputing the facts that Trump abused power, obstructed justice or used bribery and extortion for his own political gain. All they are doing is giving dumbass grandstanding mini-speeches that are nonsensical and worthless.

we dispute all of it.
 
aid was never withheld, so go blow yourself.

Quiet Fart Face!

Aid was withheld according to eye-witnessed and ear-witnessed accounts in the first person. Records proved the delay in funds was over 55 days long and renewed by the corrupt state fund department every 6 days- according to US State Department Budget Office records and official documents used as evidence in this case..

So you are totally out of your mind and out of line here today FART FACE!
 
Last edited:
Quiet Fart Face!

Aid was withheld according to eye-witnessed and ear-witnessed accounts in the first person.

So you are totally out of your mind and out of line here today FART FACE!

The facts cannot be contested so the traitorous GOP scum are playing whataboutism and not even questioning the law scholars available to them. Could their corruption be more obvious?
 
The facts cannot be contested so the traitorous GOP scum are playing whataboutism and not even questioning the law scholars available to them. Could their corruption be more obvious?

All the Republicans can do is bark at the heals of the Democrat House Investigators for doing their job- like the mad little chihuahua's they are!

tenor.gif
 
Back
Top