wow, this isn't the America we used to know?..

Apparently the righties think they do not have to go by the rules. They are good whiners though.

I keep thinking of that study that showed that whiney children grow up to be conservatives.
 
k, maybe someone could actually cite what law or ordnance was being broken by that poster being on school grounds, since the two officers there couldn't.

and trespassing charge? I'd have challenged that officer on the spot.
 
meme said:
YouTube - Officer Does Not Like anti-Obama Poster: "It ain't [urlrica] no more, OK?"
Click to expand...

Actually, it is very much the America we had to suffer through under the previous administration. Are you forgetting the greatly-expanded "free-speech zones" ? They were used here in Pgh. every time bush visited. I'm sure you were just as vehemently opposed to the idea back then, too. :p

"Free speech zones were commonly used by President George W Bush after the September 11, 2001 attacks and through the 2004 election. Free speech zones were set up by the Secret Service, who scouted locations where the U.S. president was scheduled to speak, or pass through. Officials targeted those who carried anti-Bush signs and escorted them to the free speech zones prior to and during the event. Reporters were often barred by local officials from displaying these protesters on camera or speaking to them within the zone.[3][4] Protesters who refused to go to the free speech zone were often arrested and charged with trespassing, disorderly conduct and/or resisting arrest.[16][17] A seldom-used federal law making it unlawful to "willfully and knowingly to enter or remain in ... any posted, cordoned off, or otherwise restricted area of a building or grounds where the President or other person protected by the Secret Service is or will be temporarily visiting" has also been invoked."

[ame]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_speech_zone[/url]
 
Last edited:
christiefan915 said:
Actually, it is very much the America we had to suffer through under the previous administration. Are you forgetting the greatly-expanded "free-speech zones" ? They were used here in Pgh. every time bush visited. I'm sure you were just as vehemently opposed to the idea back then, too. :p

"Free speech zones were commonly used by President George W Bush after the September 11, 2001 attacks and through the 2004 election. Free speech zones were set up by the Secret Service, who scouted locations where the U.S. president was scheduled to speak, or pass through. Officials targeted those who carried anti-Bush signs and escorted them to the free speech zones prior to and during the event. Reporters were often barred by local officials from displaying these protesters on camera or speaking to them within the zone.[3][4] Protesters who refused to go to the free speech zone were often arrested and charged with trespassing, disorderly conduct and/or resisting arrest.[16][17] A seldom-used federal law making it unlawful to "willfully and knowingly to enter or remain in ... any posted, cordoned off, or otherwise restricted area of a building or grounds where the President or other person protected by the Secret Service is or will be temporarily visiting" has also been invoked."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_speech_zone
Click to expand...
Sure she has forgotten them. She screams about our rights being taken away and that, too was started in previous administrations!

We just watch them march away, one by one...
 
When I ran my caucus at the local high school I was informed that NO posters were to be placed on anything, you could hold them but not put them up anywhere.


It was to keep the school clean of political posters that the staff would then have to remove.

Because this school officer could not state the law very well deosnt mean anything that you claim it does.
 
evince said:
When I ran my caucus at the local high school I was informed that NO posters were to be placed on anything, you could hold them but not put them up anywhere.


It was to keep the school clean of political posters that the staff would then have to remove.

Because this school officer could not state the law very well deosnt mean anything that you claim it does.
Click to expand...

The officer didn't have a problem with other posters, just this one.
 
evince said:
When I ran my caucus at the local high school I was informed that NO posters were to be placed on anything, you could hold them but not put them up anywhere.


It was to keep the school clean of political posters that the staff would then have to remove.

Because this school officer could not state the law very well deosnt mean anything that you claim it does.
Click to expand...

you didn't watch the video, did you? because if you had, you'd know that the uniformed individual only had a problem with the one poster, not any of the others, and by the uniformed ones own statement on the video, it was because of the picture.

maybe next time you'd like to actually inform yourself of all the facts before going 'left'.
 
The man ws trying to HANG the sign.

Did you hear anyone say he could not hold it?

He complained about other people who held signs but those others were not trying to Hang their signs.
 
Wrrroong.

Did you even watch the video? The cop said the issue was that there was a picture on it. Man desh your an apologist to the core. If this had been a Democrat at a Bush rally you would rightfully be furious.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top