ExpressLane
Verified User
And exactly how many brought guns to overthrow our nuclear powered government?
SCOTUS opinion leaked: Roe v Wade
- Thread starter dukkha
- Start date
Well, if you read the Proud Boys indictments, they had guns stashed outside DC and were ready to bring those guns into DC.
Oath Keepers stashed weapons at hotel for potential Jan. 6 violence, prosecutors indicate
https://abcnews.go.com/US/oath-keep...otel-potential-jan-violence/story?id=77048420
Also, you don't need to have a gun to be armed: they were armed with blunt instruments, they used flagpoles to beat people, they had bear and pepper spray, tasers, and they had an arsenal on call.
I wanted the government to drone the shit out of those Nazis.
I wanted to see Nazi blood.
But the only blood I saw that day was the DC police's.
ExpressLane
Verified User
Biden won by about 40K voted in 3 key states Wisconsin 20,682, Georgia 12,670 and Arizona 10,457 coming from urban areas including Milwaukie and Atlanta and Phoenix. Take away those 40K votes and Biden loses.
11+ 10 + 16 = 37 electoral votes. 306 - 37 = 269 for Biden if Biden did take Wisconsin, Arizona, and Georgia You need 270 Electoral votes to win.
Last edited:
ExpressLane
Verified User
So they forgot to bring them with them for their insurrectionist assault on the Capital.
Remind me again how many were armed with guns at the time of the riot? The DC police had tasers and guns.You were once a zygote. baby, child, teen and now an adult
If along the way at "any" of those points your progress was stopped u would not be here today
That's called ending your life!
Hitler was once a zygote too.
No, they stashed them just outside the Capitol, on call.
They also brought all their non-firearm weapons with them, including bear spray, tasers, and flagpoles and bats they used as weapons.
Why do you think people can only be armed with guns?
How about this...how about we meet, and I bring a baseball bat that I use the beat the living shit out of you to prove that you don't need a gun to be armed?
Gonna take me up on that offer? I doubt it because you're a big 'ol fuckin wimp.
But didn't use them, even though they should have and would have if the terrorists were Brown or Black.
Roe was ruled on in the 1973. Abortion is not illegal under Federal law and has never been illegal under Federal law. The current draft ruling clearly sends the decision whether to make abortion illegal back to the states. So let me ask you again. Why would they have to write a specific law to say an embryo and a fetus were legal victims in 2004 if it had always been the case prior to that?
Stringfellow Hawk
Member
Oh no, whores will have to go back to using birth control pills instead getting abortions, how terrible
Yes your mother should have used birth control pills.
Forever, the Dems have been lecturing us on the need for a few "reasonable restrictions" on the right to bear arms, for the good of society and to save lives.
For over two year, Dems and Biden have been lecturing us on the need for a few more "reasonable restrictions" on the right to bear arms, for the good of society and to save lives.
After ignoring burning and looting for two years, the Dems suddenly lecture us, and imprison us, after Jan 6th to revoke our right to "peaceably assemble" and "make our voices heard", for the good of society and to save lives.
For the last two weeks, we have had Dems lecturing us on the need for "reasonable restrictions" on our freedom of speech, once again, for the good of society and to save lives.
Now, all the sudden, they don't like the Supreme Court ruling to let the states decide what are "reasonable restrictions" on even the basic right to life?
I am kinda lovin' the meltdown. For the bots and any Dems that are stalking our forum, let me say, in case you haven't noticed, that all 3 branches of the federal government now are fenced and walled off in Washington, DC. dinosaur advice for Nancy, Liz, Adam x 2, and the Squad ... better let all the Jan 6th political prisoners out so you have room for all the real insurrectionists. By the time the real decision is announced, your half of America will be burned to the ground.
Shame on Democrats for leaking this, and for attempting to influence the courts in this manner! Is there a penalty for attempting to influence a court from outside a courtroom? I am not sure there is a law specific to this! No jury, so no jury tampering. No witnesses, so no witness tampering. The closest term I can think of is terrorism, or to quote the progressive Democrats, "domestic terrorism". Oh boy, I bet DOJ and FBI never saw this one coming!
For over two year, Dems and Biden have been lecturing us on the need for a few more "reasonable restrictions" on the right to bear arms, for the good of society and to save lives.
After ignoring burning and looting for two years, the Dems suddenly lecture us, and imprison us, after Jan 6th to revoke our right to "peaceably assemble" and "make our voices heard", for the good of society and to save lives.
For the last two weeks, we have had Dems lecturing us on the need for "reasonable restrictions" on our freedom of speech, once again, for the good of society and to save lives.
Now, all the sudden, they don't like the Supreme Court ruling to let the states decide what are "reasonable restrictions" on even the basic right to life?
I am kinda lovin' the meltdown. For the bots and any Dems that are stalking our forum, let me say, in case you haven't noticed, that all 3 branches of the federal government now are fenced and walled off in Washington, DC. dinosaur advice for Nancy, Liz, Adam x 2, and the Squad ... better let all the Jan 6th political prisoners out so you have room for all the real insurrectionists. By the time the real decision is announced, your half of America will be burned to the ground.
Shame on Democrats for leaking this, and for attempting to influence the courts in this manner! Is there a penalty for attempting to influence a court from outside a courtroom? I am not sure there is a law specific to this! No jury, so no jury tampering. No witnesses, so no witness tampering. The closest term I can think of is terrorism, or to quote the progressive Democrats, "domestic terrorism". Oh boy, I bet DOJ and FBI never saw this one coming!
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
Biology doesn't say that gender is a broad spectrum.
That's why gender reassignment surgery only has male and female options.
ExpressLane
Verified User
Your's should have had an abortion. (See how that works)
Copycat.
FreeSpeech1789
Banned
So then explain what makes a baby a baby.
FreeSpeech1789
Banned
Biology doesn't say that gender is a broad spectrum.
That's why gender reassignment surgery only has male and female options.
Their arguments aren't even internally consistent.
If the states outlaw abortion it is through the normal political process of the state legislature and governor to decide.
Sounds like accurate reporting.
ExpressLane
Verified User
Wrong Rosko
Check out the 3rd graph on this page.https://www.johnstonsarchive.net/policy/adoptionstats.html
And there is this "In 2019, over 672,000 children spent time in U.S. foster care." https://www.childrensrights.org/new...n any given day, there,for five or more years.
Oh BTW you still haven't provided proof that I'm opposed to birth control . So every knows you are just a liar. You and Joe are kindred souls.
Last edited:
Stringfellow Hawk
Member
Unlike you, I actually knew both my parents