You gotta be "getting some" to be counted among the Ordinary, Grind...
i do just fine thank you very much.
You gotta be "getting some" to be counted among the Ordinary, Grind...
The pain caused to the mother and the tensions bound to arrise most certainly imapct children...like I said you are a total stoopie. Emotional abandonment, caused by a breaking of trust and infliction of emotional pain is as real as physical abandonement. To believe otherwise is a self absorbed kind of narcissim...
Of course it might have helped ID if she had bothered to look up some of the details of the story before condemning anyone.
It now appears as though the affair occured BEFORE Letterman married his longtime girlfriend and had a son.
"Sources tell TMZ that Letterman and Birkitt had a sexual relationship that ended before 2003, when his son Harry was born.
Sources tell RadarOnline.com that "Birkitt and Letterman slept together for a period of time before he married his girlfriend Regina had their son Harry" and that Birkitt is reportedly "mortified Halderman is using her fling with Letterman to blackmail her boss."
Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/02/stephanie-birkitt-letterm_n_307558.html
He didn't cheat on me, so I really don't care. As far as I understand it this happened before he was married even. Scandal? M'eh.
As scandals go this is slim pickings. He did the right thing and will likely put some slime in prison.
He married her and I doubt he's religious. I don't need to offer proof that he's lying sack of letcherous shit...he just is.
It is not my quest in life to take a position on the morality of every TV personality's personal life. If this was a "friend" of mine he would no longer be my friend. He isn't. If this were my daughter's boyfriend I would advise her not to marry him. It isn't. If this were illegal and people were looking the other way it would matter. It isn't. (Except the blackmail part that is, but that is being handled.)Yeah, because how you were personally effected means that it doesn't matter as in have a negative opinion or not. It's news, my opinion on the news is that Letterman and the blackmailer are both scum. Both men acted for selfish reasons and neither mens actions effect you...go figure.
I'm sorry, he's an adulterous lecherous scum bag...mo betta asshole? Try a real argument Tom.
Adulterous? In which way? He wasn't married, and as far as I know neither was the staffer. It isn't like I watch his show, or I'd have likely known about it before it was reported on the radio this morning, but really.I'm sorry, he's an adulterous lecherous scum bag...mo betta asshole? Try a real argument Tom.
It is not my quest in life to take a position on the morality of every TV personality's personal life. If this was a "friend" of mine he would no longer be my friend. He isn't. If this were my daughter's boyfriend I would advise her not to marry him. It isn't. If this were illegal and people were looking the other way it would matter. It isn't. (Except the blackmail part that is, but that is being handled.)
He wasn't married, he didn't do this while he was or even while he was a father. It isn't much of a "scandal"... Seriously. There really is no reason for me to give a moral lecture to a man who wasn't married, likely for just such occasion, about the morality of his personal life.
The person who broke the law in this case is being prosecuted.
I have to agree, and if the woman goes into a relationship with a cheating boyfriend and marries him, honey, you made your bed, lay in it! any woman who thinks they will change a man is truly dreaming.סּ_סּ;530129 said:woman just will never understand. They just don't have the same sexual urges men do. So to judge men by a women's standards is wrong.
Adulterous? In which way? He wasn't married, and as far as I know neither was the staffer. It isn't like I watch his show, or I'd have likely known about it before it was reported on the radio this morning, but really.
He's ruined his political career outside of California. That's about it.
To err is human, to forgive divine, isn't that a basic tenet of Christianity?
Fidelity is not consistent with the male biological imperitive. Only 50k years ago men coupled with many different women. Some men had many because they put meat on the table and protected their mates and their stuff better than others. Women are genetically driven to chose the best provider for their children. Until very recently, about the last 8 or 5k years men all had more than one mate. Monogamy is not natural. It may become natural somewhere along the way, but hundreds of thousands, if not millions of men provide very well for their families and have sexual relationships on the side. Sex doesn't mean much for men outside of the physical aspect. Men can have sex with many women at once and not love any of them. Love and sex are not synonomous nor does one require the other. You may not like that fact but it is true.What stupid BS! He had a wife and a child. It's not about religion, it's about responsibility and fidelity to the promises made to those who trust you...grow the fuck up.![]()
why is he scum? for cheating on his girlfriend and having sex with women he works with? lol then 66% of men are scum.
סּ_סּ;530074 said:he's human and wanting sex is natural. Doesn't mean he loves his wife any less just cause he wants some fun on the side. I think people have to let go of this whole notion of "marry and only have sex with one person for the rest of your life." It's not natural. It's old outdated religious and societal ritual. Why can't you love your wife and have casual sex with someone else?