Making shit up about yourself again, eh?
Election workers can certainly change votes, or add votes, or fail to count them.
Writing code to flip votes 'very easy to do' but 'hard to stop,' programmer warns Ari
- Thread starter ptif219
- Start date
Making shit up about yourself again, eh?
Election workers can certainly change votes, or add votes, or fail to count them.
Of course he did. Democrats want to control elections and how votes are counted
https://justthenews.com/politics-po...inues-new-funds-candidates-recruited-election
Correct. So was the plan to kill Osama bin Laden.
Do you understand the difference between a conspiracy and a conspiracy theory, Sybil?
There is no such thing as a 'conspiracy theory'. Buzzword fallacy.
Thank you for having the integrity to acknowledge this. In fact, it was Crypto.Com that got hit - which does not use distributed encryption.
You're missing the point.
The use of Blockchain makes the encryption of data decentralized and distributed. The positive identification is done to provide a hash key to the user. The decentralized nature of the technology removes the single point of entry that brute force attacks - such as the one Crypto.Com fell prey to, useless.
It would work phenomenally - and would be entirely secure.
Your point about BitCoin block size is valid, but in voting, there would be a fixed number of nodes, one per precinct would seem rational, it would not exponentially grow.
Here are a few links to NIST that explore various applications of BC, including in voting.
https://www.nist.gov/blockchain
Hand counting has been rife with constant fraud - the midnight dumps of ballots that democrats engage in EVERY election. Without substantial change, the democrat corruption of elections will continue.
Certainly.
No, I am making a point that you seem to be ignoring.
Not how blockchain works. It is not a codec.
There is no positive identification in blockchains. Blockchains do not identify with hash keys.
The single point of entry is the election office (which happens to be the source of the problem).
Nope. It is no more secure than voting is now.
Not how blockchain works. The size of the blockchain is not dependent on the number of nodes. Why one node per precinct?
Heh. One is not 'a few'. No, the same limitations apply and the same faults apply that I mentioned.
Why are these 'midnight dumps of ballots' not prosecuted? It is obvious election fraud and in violation of law.
The change is to enforce the law and aggressively punish election fraudsters.
It's amusing for the fascists to post this. No one here suggested that poll workers are changing votes. But you fascists sure said they were; In fact Princeton and "Wired" claimed that blue hairs at the polls could reprogram them without a keyboard or user interface, tapping out binary using the lead wires.
https://citp.princeton.edu/our-work/voting/
More amusing is the Dominion IS DEIBOLD. The fascist left loves to say "Deibold bad, Dominion good, bahh, bahhh." But Deibold simply merged with other concerns and rebranded to Dominion - that the left now says are flawless and perfect.
The number 1 form of election fraud is proxy voting. An illegal alien voting using the registration of dead voters or voters who have moved. It is impossible to prove on a large scale and can only be stopped through clean registration rolls and voter ID - which is why the democrats fight with everything they have to stop both ID and cleaning voter rolls.
The second most common is the "midnight dump"
https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB122644940271419147
Stop with your idiocy.
Douche Duck, why do you call others "Sybil" when the only one I've seen proven to run socks, is you?
Once again proving that there is no hypocrisy like demopocrisy..
You are generally correct here. Proxy voting is illegal in most cases in many States, allowed only for certain very limited circumstances (such as serving in the military). The Democrats used fear mongering over covid19 to conduct widespread proxy voting. This in and of itself is election fraud.
The 'midnight dump' is also election fraud. Election offices are closed. NO COUNTING SHOULD BE OCCURRING and NO BALLOTS SHOULD BE ACCEPTED. Counting should be done by each precinct, not a central office. Precincts should be small, not covering thousands of voters.
The falsely registered voter is another common tactic. Blockchain is NO help here. The same office that has incorrect voting records would be issuing the identifiers.
If you were smarter, Underscore, you'd know I only call Sybil's three socks "Sybil". Wanna guess why?
dead voters are registering? How do they do that? Do you know that votes are sent to the precinct that the voter is assigned to? They keep a book of all registered voters. They see if the vote is assigned to their precinct. If so, the first check is a signature match. That is mostly computerized now. If it passes that, then the balot is counted assuming the voter did not fuck it up with too many votes for judges etc. If it passes, the vote is counted and the VOTER IN MARKED AS VOTED. That means another vote with his name on it would be flagged and the poll officials would be called.
If the name on the ballot is not in the log book, it is rejected. It cannot be counted. Officials are notified.
A dump of ballots, early or late would go through the same procedures. As you can see, that would not work.
Illegals using dead persons' ballots? That makes sense to you? How. The most common form of voter fraud is spouses using dead spouses' ballots. The majority of that tiny segment were Repub voters.
Why would illegals want to vote? They are here to make money and support their families. Why would they want to vote in an election that they know nothing about? Would you vote in Mexican elections if you could?? Who would you vote for? Of course, you know nothing about their politicians. Yet you think they want to vote in ours.
He thinks everyone else is a sock.
I never said there is. What I said is that verification of identity is performed prior to giving the voter a hash key.
That's not how blockchain works.
Come now, the size of the ledger is entirely dependent on number of nodes. The issue with BitCoin you brought up is the exponential growth of ledger size due to the exponential growth of nodes involved.
You didn't click the link, it leads to the NIST site that indeed has quite a few peer reviewed articles listed.
The reason these dumps and proxy voting are not prosecuted is that they leave no audit trail and are exceedingly hard to prove in court.
Oh, I know why;
“Accuse the other side of that which you are guilty” - Saul Alensky
https://www.amazon.com/Rules-Radica...3bb836e1af615f51b5d11fdfd65ffb&language=en_US
Dead voters are not cleared from registration rolls, moron.
You Nazis wage litigious war to stop voter rolls from being updated to remove those who have died or moved. Election fraud is WHY your filthy Reich fights these efforts.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/28/politics/voter-roll-purges-lawsuits-vote-by-mail/index.html
You've proved that maxim throughout this thread, Underscore:
RQAA.
Including dead voters and voters that have moved out of the precinct.
Doesn't happen with proxy voting, dumbass.
Nope.
So are fake ballots.
Which is why the legitimate voter finds out somebody else already voted for him illegally.
No, they are not called.
Since dead people and people that have moved away are in the log book. The result is a fake ballot.
Illegal to dump ballots early or late.
RQAA.
Nope. Election fraud is conducted by election workers.
Lie.
They are paid.
They are paid.
They are paid.
So...no different than presently done, along with all the same problems with voter records.
No. It is dependent on the number of transactions.
No. It is dependent on the number of transactions.
Consensus is not a proof. Attempted proof by consensus.
No audit trail????!? Then the midnight ballot dumps never occurred? Of course they have! The ballot stuffing never occurred? Of course they have! The election laws changing after the fact and by illegal authority never occurred? Of course they have. The illegal counting after hours with no observers never occurred? Of course they have. The software faults in the voting machines never existed? Of course they have. The conduction of an election by a person running for office never occurred? Of course it did. The failure of a legislature to choose electors never happened? Of course it did.
Yeah. There is a lot of evidence. It all has an 'audit trail' as you describe.
Now don't get me wrong, I like blockchain technology. It won't work for elections though. Blockchains simply don't work that way. They are not a codec. They have many uses as a digital currency and as a logkeeping method, but they cannot fix the faults in the election system. It is no magick fix. Aggressive enforcement of the law (including the Constitution) will do that.
Last edited: