Trump-Stormy Daniels settlement at heart of potential NY DA indictment didn't violate

Says the slum lord lawyer who thinks Fox is the only valid network and who does a job that paralegals do better than he does.
its the end of the month.....isn't it time for you to inventory how many tubes of toothpaste you have on your Dollar General shelves?
 
its the end of the month.....isn't it time for you to inventory how many tubes of toothpaste you have on your Dollar General shelves?

...or how much evil you've spread with lies for your Father of Lies, Pmp?

How long have you sold your soul to embrace evil, PostmodernProphet?
 
Why do you support violence against Americans, Matt?

Why do you threaten to murder members of this forum for disagreeing with your ideology?

I never threatened to murder you, Crutchboi.

I find peace in the solace that you're so stupid, one day you're going to do one of your stupids, and it's going to kill you.

Don't see you having a natural end to your life. You'll die because you're stupid and arrogant.

It will be self inflicted.
 
I never threatened to murder you, Crutchboi...

That's a lie, Red Flag, but I concede that you were probably shit-faced most of the time you made death threats against JPP members. I expect that the next time you are arrested, you'll be almost too drunk to stand.

High velocity .270 right between your fucktarded eyes would be worth a life sentence.

I bet I could take out moar leftist shitbags before they catch me for doing you in, too.
 
That's a lie, Red Flag, but I concede that you were probably shit-faced most of the time you made death threats against JPP members. I expect that the next time you are arrested, you'll be almost too drunk to stand.

Well, if only I was in Texas and gave a fuck, and you were seriously threatening me, Dutch. This is an anonymous messageboard, and you're free to spout your bullshit.

I'll defeat your arguments on the merit of them, but you are observably a sick puppy.
 
No. Trump will die of natural causes in his own home.

R U mad because your WSE friends didn't murder Mike Pence, Pelosi and the rest of Congress, Red Flag?

Was that last mass shooting a WSE, dumbfuck? How about the 1 before that, hmm?

Yeah, this is your projected slander:

1afallonface.gif
 
Well, if only I was in Texas and gave a fuck, and you were seriously threatening me, Dutch. This is an anonymous messageboard, and you're free to spout your bullshit.

I'll defeat your arguments on the merit of them, but you are observably a sick puppy.

:laugh: :rofl2: :laugh: Sooooo you'd murder me, but it'd be my fault. LOL

Feel free to 'splain that to the Judge when your anger gets you into trouble again, Red Flag.

7gfik3.jpg
 
Trump-Stormy Daniels settlement at heart of potential NY DA indictment didn't violate campaign law: FEC expert

Prosecutors in the Manhattan district attorney's office won't have much of a legal leg to stand on if they indict former President Donald Trump on violating campaign finance law, according to a legal expert and former member of the Federal Election Commission (FEC).

"If the state charges are based on a supposed violation of federal campaign finance law, then the Manhattan DA is way off base," Hans von SpakovskyManhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's office will reportedly meet with law enforcement officials to discuss logistics for some time next week regarding a potential indictment, which stems from a years-long investigation into Trump's alleged hush money scandal involving porn star Stormy Daniels.

In the final weeks of the 2016 presidential campaign, Trump's then-lawyer Michael Cohen sent $130,000 to Daniels to prevent her from disclosing her alleged 2006 affair with Trump, who has denied the affair. Trump subsequently reimbursed Cohen.

It's been widely speculated that Trump could be charged with overseeing the false recording of the reimbursements in his company's internal records as "legal expenses."

Prosecutors are also expected to charge Trump with violating campaign finance laws by arranging the payments to buy Daniels' silence weeks before the 2016 election. However, experts have questioned the legal reasoning behind such a charge.

"A settlement payment of a nuisance claim is not a federal campaign expense," said von Spakovsky, a senior fellow at the Heritage Foundation. "The state DA has no authority to prosecute a federal campaign finance violation in any event."

Such cases, he argues, are within the province of the FEC, where he served as a commissioner, or the U.S. Justice Department, explaining that both agencies have known about the facts for years but have chosen not to prosecute Trump.

"So, the federal agencies with jurisdiction did not consider it a violation," said von Spakovsky, who's been following this case for years.

In 2018, von Spakovsky wrote that the payment to Daniels seemed to be a "nuisance settlement," which celebrities often make, especially when faced with the threat of a false or salacious claim.

"Critics of the president claim this not only was a campaign expense that should have been reported but a potentially illegal loan by Cohen. But the settlement was ultimately paid out of Trump's personal funds and had nothing to do with the campaign since their alleged one-night stand occurred 10 years before the campaign," wrote von Spakovsky. "No reasonable member of a jury would consider this to be a campaign-related expense that needed to be reported, or to which any other campaign finance rules in the Federal Election Campaign Act apply."....


"The alleged one-night stand between Daniels and Trump is far more of a stretch," wrote von Spakovsky. "Daniels had no connection to the presidential campaign of any kind and the encounter — if it occurred — didn't happen during the campaign itself. In any event, even if the Daniels payment were to be considered a campaign-related expense, unlike Edwards, the nominal $130,000 payment wasn't made by Trump campaign donors but by Trump's personal attorney (not the campaign's attorney) with whom he has a long-standing business relationship. . . . Even if one might be able to reasonably construe the payment to Daniels as somehow related to the presidential campaign, there still would be no violation since candidates are allowed to spend as much of their own money as they want on their own campaigns."


https://www.foxnews.com/politics/tr...ictment-didnt-violate-campaign-law-fec-expert

================================


If this pending arrest is hinged around this hush money payment to Stormy Daniels the case is doomed to failure. A Presidential candidate can do what they want with their own money. This case will not see Trump behind bars or saddled with a felony conviction if it hinges on this payment.

It's obvious to anyone with at least half a brain; that would exclude most Democrats and their media enablers.
 
Where there's smoke, there's fire. Considering JPP's finest Keyboard Kommandos have started so many threads on this subject indicates they are worried it has teeth.

There are more active threads claiming Trump's innocence and why NY is wrong than on Hunter Biden.

Another moronic post from the forums mental case. :palm:
 
:laugh: :rofl2: :laugh: Sooooo you'd murder me, but it'd be my fault. LOL

Feel free to 'splain that to the Judge when your anger gets you into trouble again, Red Flag.

7gfik3.jpg

Unless it actually ends up interfering with a person's real life. You piece of shit. Y U trying to SWAT me?

You're that much of a coward?
 
It's remarkable that a sleazebag who paid hush money to a porn star is the most popular and beloved Republican politician of the 21st century.

More remarkable that a sleazebag who sexually harassed women and an intern is still one of the most popular Democrats on the planet.

You asswhipes on the left have no moral ground to stand on halfwit. :palm:
 
Back
Top