Trump-Stormy Daniels settlement at heart of potential NY DA indictment didn't violate

finish it. Finish that last sentence as you are so close to a break thru showing you have a modicum of understanding this.


...the money given to Stormy was Trump's cost ...HE MUST BOOK AS HIS OWN CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION TO HIS CAMPAIGN OR HE IS BREAKING CAMPAIGN FINANCE LAW!

he is not required to report things which were not campaign contributions as campaign contributions just because demmycrats want him to have done so.....
 
sorry, I don't keep track of what you folks believe......
Honest, God-fearing Americans?

You follow the Father of Lies, Pmp.

John 8:44
You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.
 
everything about the ignorance of NY voters is difficult to understand......

iowa-only-place.jpg
 
We are fully aware that the democrat party is not subject to the laws imposed on others.

Oh so the argument that Democrats are so incredibly intelligent that there is nothing the Republicans can do to catch and hold them accoun table even when Trump and other GOP admins control the Presidency, the DOJ and get Dem's in front of Republican appointed judges, but Dems can put masses of Republicans in jail.

Check mate Republicans and your supporters... you are stupid.

I will take that. Imagine being you and admitting how stupid and hopeless you are. Waaa the Dems are just too good at this and we cannot win.

You understand you are saying that John Durham, appointed by Trump, who cannot find anything worthwhile to charge and Ken Starr and Brett Kavanaugh chasing Clinton who could not find anything worthwhile to charge, was because Dems are too smart, right?
 
no one is denying that Cohen pled guilty as part of a plea deal to get reduced jail time for his tax fraud case.....we're just pointing out Trump didn't violate any laws.....

And the slum lord lawyer delves the depths of stupidity once again.

There is no crime for Cohen to plead guilty to without the one more responsible for that crime who forwarded the money, benefitted from it and had the motive to make it happen, which was Trump. AKA "Individual 1".
 
FALSE.

Empty Fox talking point eaten up by the gullible.


If an expense has duel purpose, which it certainly can, and if Trump argues the only reason he decided to pay on the eve of his election run was to protect Milenia when he was not looking to pay in all the years prior, he will have to convince a jury it was not ALSO to protect him in the election.

if the jury finds it is reasonable to think he might have wanted to protect Milenia but he ALSO wanted to protected his campaign. then he would be guilty of Campaign Finance violations.

so that comes down to what discussions and notes do they have on that? Do you think Trump was telling Michael Pecker (National Enquirer) that he was so concerned about his deep love for wife Melania, FLOL, or do you think he was saying this would be a disaster for his campaign? Any betting man knows which Trump cares about and which he does not.


Wrong. This is what Bradly Smith the former head of the FEC wrote :
the Federal Election Commission passed regulations nearly 25 years ago clarifying that campaign funds have to pay for obligations that exist only because of the campaign. If the obligation was created “irrespective of” the campaign, it’s not a campaign expenditure.

Trump didn't want Melania or the rest of his family to know about Stormy and he didn't want to hurt the Trump brand. So the obligation was created irrespective of the campaign.


Sorry to burst your bubble. Trump just paid it in 2016 because Stormy saw her chance to extort him.
 
Last edited:
And the slum lord lawyer delves the depths of stupidity once again.

There is no crime for Cohen to plead guilty to without the one more responsible for that crime who forwarded the money, benefitted from it and had the motive to make it happen, which was Trump. AKA "Individual 1".

what do Dollar General cashiers know about lawyers.....there is no need for Cohen to plead guilty to campaing finance violations unless there's a prosecuter willing to offer a deal if he will do it.....
 
Wrong. This is what Bradly Smith the former head of the FEC wrote :

Trump didn't want Melania or the rest of his family to know about Stormy and he didn't want to hurt the Trump brand. So the obligation was created irrespective of the campaign.


Sorry to burst your bubble. Trump just paid it in 2016 because Stormy saw her chance to extort him.

Wrong.

Firstly it is hard to apply the word 'irrespective' when Trump only finds the need to silence this issue on the eve of his election run and not in the years prior.

Secondly here is what ACTUAL FEC lawyers who recommend the charging actually believed at the time of the examinination of this...

...In a detailed report, the FEC’s nonpartisan career attorneys in its Office of General Counsel recommended that the commission find reason to believe that Trump, his campaign and the Trump Organization knowingly and willfully violated multiple campaign finance laws by orchestrating the Daniels payment, including by obscuring the source of the money, violating contribution limits and violating the corporate contribution ban.

cite
 
welfare recipients vote for the party that bestows them.....
True. In this case, the populist who promises Euro-American male losers that he'll make America great again by restoring all Euro-American males to the top of the food chain just like in the good ol' days.

6ob958.jpg
 
Back
Top