Damocles and CREW...

zymurgy said:
I will cite the lawyers in the tossed out John Edwards case

"“If the spending would exist irrespective of the campaign, it’s not a campaign law violation”

so you have to prove he would not of spent that money to protect his kids name. you can't - it is a bullshit charge
Click to expand...

So those guys said that... it favored their client, what was the judges reaction? What did the prosecutor say? What did the jury instructions say?
 
Jarod said:
I cant remember the thered or Id bump it, but remember when you said there is no way Bragg could prove the payment to Stormy was related to the campaign....



Well read the Statement of Facts....

https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23741892/donald-j-trump-sof.pdf


There is audio of Trump telling Cohen to delay paying Stormy under the agreement, because if she can be held off until after the election it would no longer matter to him if she told her story.


BAM, that is what I told you might be in evidence... You said there was no way!
Click to expand...

So then this letter is another of Felon Cohen's lies?

69003937-11891633-image-a-40_1679519003822.jpg


Trying to claim that paying someone to keep their mouths shut and paying from personal funds as a campaign interference issue is beyond stupid, it is epically moronic. :palm:

Hell, using that illogical bullshit logic, we can start arresting nearly every politician who ever campaigned. Dunce.
 
Jarod said:
I cant remember the thered or Id bump it, but remember when you said there is no way Bragg could prove the payment to Stormy was related to the campaign....



Well read the Statement of Facts....

https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23741892/donald-j-trump-sof.pdf


There is audio of Trump telling Cohen to delay paying Stormy under the agreement, because if she can be held off until after the election it would no longer matter to him if she told her story.


BAM, that is what I told you might be in evidence... You said there was no way!
Click to expand...

that's evidence of non-payment.
 
zymurgy said:
it needs to be more than related - it has to be THE reason.

If he can argue that he would of tried to save his reputation regardless of running for office, it is no longer campaign related

and what kind of moron thinks they can prove he wouldn't care about his reputation otherwise?
Click to expand...

Trump doesn't even need to make that argument; it is automatically presumed. Leftist halfwits like Jarod can stomp their tiny little feet all day long and say "nuh uh", but it doesn't make them less wrong or stupid.
 
zymurgy said:
bwahahaha.

"Correct your honor, I didn't really care, but I looked at my son and my wife, and knew they would care. I spent that money to protect their feelings"

case dismissed





you liberals are the biggest jokes when it comes to legal issues.
Click to expand...

He is on tape during the issue saying he only cares about the election period


Cold, hard and condemning statements
 
Cypress said:
I can see Trump promising to pay hush money to a porn star and then scheming to stiff her.
Click to expand...

Of course you can, but you're a dishonest moron. Stormy has lost TWO legal cases to Trump. I think that speaks for itself about her credibility and the fact that she is nothing more than an opportunistic grifter. The kind of person leftist morons like you snuggle up to and hail as heroes. :palm:
 
Truth Detector said:
Trump doesn't even need to make that argument; it is automatically presumed. Leftist halfwits like Jarod can stomp their tiny little feet all day long and say "nuh uh", but it doesn't make them less wrong or stupid.
Click to expand...
Evidence in his own words during the incident
 
NiftyNiblick said:
Making the Stormy Daniels issue an election campaign issue is a huge stretch.

Trump is an irredeemable asshole,
and only a fellow asshole would consider voting for him,
but that all pertains to relevant issues.

His extracurricular activities are none of the electorate's business.
People who care about shit like that are realistically not sophisticated enough to belong in a polling place voting booth.
Click to expand...

It’s illegal idiot
 
Jarod said:
Wrong, it only has to me a minor reason, but if Trump did not care if Stormy talked after the election... what other reason would there be?
Click to expand...

Once again, you illustrate your utter lack of the law or how to make a coherent argument. :palm:

It's simple if you're not a dishonest lying leftist hack trying to promote a lie; it was an easy way to get rid of a nuisance grifter and save any embarrassment for his wife and kids.

Of course, Stormy couldn't keep her word and was convinced by another convict that she could get far more money by breaking her agreement. She's lost two civil suits and about a half a million following Avanati's bad advice.

You're a lawyer kind of like Avanati and Cohen; stupid and dishonest. :palm:
 
Jarod said:
He is on tape saying he only cares if the story comes out before the election, he does not care if it comes out after, dip shit.
Click to expand...

One, you're going on my ignore list for calling me a "dip shit." Fuck you and your syphilitic mother.

Two, I don't give a fat flying fuck what the idiot Trump said about the election.

The electorate had plenty of legitimate reasons to reject Trump, but his recreational fucking wasn't one of them
to anybody with enough brains to know what's important.
 
zymurgy said:
I will cite the lawyers in the tossed out John Edwards case

"“If the spending would exist irrespective of the campaign, it’s not a campaign law violation”

so you have to prove he would not of spent that money to protect his kids name. you can't - it is a bullshit charge
Click to expand...

And Edwards never said on tape that it was about the election
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top