“Supreme Court on ethics issues: Not broken, no fix needed”

Hello archives,

“WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court is speaking with one voice in response to recent criticism of the justices’ ethical practices: No need to fix what isn’t broken.

“The justices’ response on Tuesday struck some critics and ethics experts as tone deaf at a time of heightened attention on the justices’ travel and private business transactions”

“Charles Geyh, an Indiana University law professor and legal ethics expert, said everything the justices detailed Tuesday evening about ethics was essentially outlined in Chief Justice John Roberts’ annual year-end report from 2011, more than a decade ago.”

“They’re basically saying ... What we’ve been doing is just fine.”

“Thomas has for more than two decades accepted luxury trips nearly every year from Republican megadonor Harlan Crow. Gorsuch sold property which he disclosed the sale but omitted that the property was purchased by a person whose firm frequently has cases before the high court. Roberts’ wife raised ethical concerns that she was paid large sums for placing lawyers at firms that appear before the court.”

“The justices seem to be utterly clueless about the problem they have ... They’re in a bubble apparently. They don’t see what a big problem they have”

https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-ethics-clarence-thomas-2f3fbc26a4d8fe45c82269127458fa08

Every Court in the US, from local to Federal, has a defined code of conduct with an authority to monitor complaints except the Supreme Court, they supposedly consider themselves above everyone else. They appear totally unconnected with the people who are effected by their decisions, which explains some of the flat out stupid comments some of them make

They are a separate branch, but they are also part of the Federal Gov’t, and as I noted, the only entity within that Government, and even their own branch, without an enforceable code of ethics

OK, if that's the way they want to handle it. We tried.

Time for Term Limits to be imposed on them.
 
Whoa, that is out there, so in your world you have God, and the Supreme Court a notch below Him/Her, and then everyone/everything else to follow. And I guess that means if one doesn’t believe in God, the Supreme Court becomes the Almighty

You got to get out more “earl,” a lot more

Just because atheists don't believe in God doesn't mean that there is no God.

There is and yes, He is above the S.C. and you, Anchovies.
 
and i'll bet you wholeheartedly believe that left leaning justices have better ethics than the right leaning ones.....am I right? I expect that your bias will prove that, even though this has been an issue for over a century. I find it typically hypocritical of leftists to only NOW question the ethics because it's a Roberts led court

The Justices that have been exposed are Thomas, Gorsuch, and Roberts himself, and last I know, none of them are "left leaning Justices." In addition, I already said the women Justices who lean left are also living in lala land for signing Roberts letter.

For anyone to believe the Justices can police themselves regarding ethics is absurd given the rash of recent disclosures, and for the Justices themselves to reclaim they can, they also did it twelve years ago, shows they are living in a fantasy land
 
Quite simply, nothing justice Thomas did was illegal or unethical. This was a political hit job by the democrats in attempt to corrupt the independence of the judiciary.

Got to love the nothing he did was illegal, same lame arguement we hear appled to Trump, "he didn't break the law did he?" Martin Shkreli didn't break any law when he quadrupled the cost of necessary Cancer drugs, you going to tell us next it was ethical?
 
Just because atheists don't believe in God doesn't mean that there is no God.

There is and yes, He is above the S.C. and you, Anchovies.

So now "earl" has the Supreme Court just one notch below God, beautiful, say good night "earl," you're done
 
Got to love the nothing he did was illegal, same lame arguement we hear appled to Trump, "he didn't break the law did he?" Martin Shkreli didn't break any law when he quadrupled the cost of necessary Cancer drugs, you going to tell us next it was ethical?

I know, you really wanted to lynch him.

But the highest court in the land - the one you fascists said for a century WERE the constitution, ruled very clearly that nothing justice Thomas did was illegal or unethical.
 
“WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court is speaking with one voice in response to recent criticism of the justices’ ethical practices: No need to fix what isn’t broken.

“The justices’ response on Tuesday struck some critics and ethics experts as tone deaf at a time of heightened attention on the justices’ travel and private business transactions”

“Charles Geyh, an Indiana University law professor and legal ethics expert, said everything the justices detailed Tuesday evening about ethics was essentially outlined in Chief Justice John Roberts’ annual year-end report from 2011, more than a decade ago.”

“They’re basically saying ... What we’ve been doing is just fine.”

“Thomas has for more than two decades accepted luxury trips nearly every year from Republican megadonor Harlan Crow. Gorsuch sold property which he disclosed the sale but omitted that the property was purchased by a person whose firm frequently has cases before the high court. Roberts’ wife raised ethical concerns that she was paid large sums for placing lawyers at firms that appear before the court.”

“The justices seem to be utterly clueless about the problem they have ... They’re in a bubble apparently. They don’t see what a big problem they have”

https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-ethics-clarence-thomas-2f3fbc26a4d8fe45c82269127458fa08

Every Court in the US, from local to Federal, has a defined code of conduct with an authority to monitor complaints except the Supreme Court, they supposedly consider themselves above everyone else. They appear totally unconnected with the people who are effected by their decisions, which explains some of the flat out stupid comments some of them make

They are a separate branch, but they are also part of the Federal Gov’t, and as I noted, the only entity within that Government, and even their own branch, without an enforceable code of ethics

The argument is objectively false, no matter which Justices believe it (I don't believe they all do). This is a feeble attempt to restore confidence. It is objectively false because these ethics violations have measurably reduced confidence in the court. Simple. Confidence gives the court legitimacy. It no longer has the confidence of the American people.
 
Got to love the nothing he did was illegal, same lame arguement we hear appled to Trump, "he didn't break the law did he?" Martin Shkreli didn't break any law when he quadrupled the cost of necessary Cancer drugs, you going to tell us next it was ethical?

Ethics and integrity are the bar. SCOTUS falls well short.
 
The argument is objectively false, no matter which Justices believe it (I don't believe they all do). This is a feeble attempt to restore confidence. It is objectively false because these ethics violations have measurably reduced confidence in the court. Simple. Confidence gives the court legitimacy. It no longer has the confidence of the American people.

correction, it no longer has the confidence of the anti constitutional left.............your bias is showing more of your vagina
 
I know, you really wanted to lynch him.

But the highest court in the land - the one you fascists said for a century WERE the constitution, ruled very clearly that nothing justice Thomas did was illegal or unethical.

And as I said, Martin Shkreli never did anything illegal, you going to tell us next that was ethical or moral
 
The Justices that have been exposed are Thomas, Gorsuch, and Roberts himself, and last I know, none of them are "left leaning Justices." In addition, I already said the women Justices who lean left are also living in lala land for signing Roberts letter.

For anyone to believe the Justices can police themselves regarding ethics is absurd given the rash of recent disclosures, and for the Justices themselves to reclaim they can, they also did it twelve years ago, shows they are living in a fantasy land

I'd bet my eye teeth you wouldn't even be mentioning this if you perceived the court as "liberal". It's like the electoral college. The ONLY reason you don't like it is it doesnt always advance your agenda. Just like this. You people are as transparent as rice paper.
 
No their not, legalities, not ethics, they can’t even recognize their own lack of ethics

Anchovies, please review your eighth grade English grammar book concerning contractions i.e. "they're," (they are).

Thanking you in advance.

I hope I didn't hurt your feelings, Anchovies, but we must strive for the most pristine grammar that we can muster. Children read these forums...
 
Last edited:
Pay attention, Anchovies:

No need to fix what isn’t broken.

That’s exactly what Roberts claims, then again, he also has been questioned about his wife’s profiting on recommending lawyers

Fact remains that Supreme Court is a cesspool of ethical scandals right now and they’re overwhelmingly about misconduct
 
Back
Top