“Supreme Court on ethics issues: Not broken, no fix needed”

You are wrong, and you present nothing to support your claim, can’t be any more erroneous than that

There is plenty of evidence. You would argue that leftists are the friends of black people. Isnt that right? Oh course it is. Unless of course that black person is conservative then they aren't even black. It's clear to anyone with a working brain that leftists don't actually care about any of the issues they claim to care about except to the extent that they advance your agenda. That's why black conservatives are persona non grata to leftists, they don't advance the agenda of "systemic" racism. So once again if you saw this as a "liberal" court you wouldn't be whining at all.
 
Wrong, you are lying, flat out lying, there exists absolutely zero proof on who leaked the Dobbs decision, in fact, the only person saying anything in regard to who leaked it is Alito, the same Alito who did leak the Hobby Lobby decision to the very heads of Hobby Lobby

You bring nothing but talk radio rhetoric

NEXT

So your response to the fact that Kagan leaked the Dobbs decision is the typical Nazi,

7k9u4g.jpg
 
your bias is showing

the court has been political since before you and I were born. you continually fail to acknowledge this due to your leftist leanings, every bit as much as those on the right do.

They were not corrupt. Thomas is as corrupt as any politician that ever lived.
 
Every decision made by the three females on the Court were made based on their ideology rather than understanding of the law.

Kagan is a Marxist, but knows the law. Sotomayor has an IQ in the low double digits. She was an affirmative action hire and dumb as a stump. Katanji-Brown I don't know enough about to say. She is radical left, but I can't tell if she has a functional brain or not.
 
Kagan is a Marxist, but knows the law. Sotomayor has an IQ in the low double digits. She was an affirmative action hire and dumb as a stump. Katanji-Brown I don't know enough about to say. She is radical left, but I can't tell if she has a functional brain or not.

She said she couldn't answer what a woman was because he wasn't a biologist? I'm not a veterinarian but I know a dog when I see one.
 
Last edited:
She said she couldn't answer what a woman was because he wasn't.a biologist? I'm not a veterinarian but I know a dog when I see one.

That speaks more to her ethics than her intelligence.

She's a leftist - you already know she's a shameless liar.
 
“WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court is speaking with one voice in response to recent criticism of the justices’ ethical practices: No need to fix what isn’t broken.

“The justices’ response on Tuesday struck some critics and ethics experts as tone deaf at a time of heightened attention on the justices’ travel and private business transactions”

“Charles Geyh, an Indiana University law professor and legal ethics expert, said everything the justices detailed Tuesday evening about ethics was essentially outlined in Chief Justice John Roberts’ annual year-end report from 2011, more than a decade ago.”

“They’re basically saying ... What we’ve been doing is just fine.”

“Thomas has for more than two decades accepted luxury trips nearly every year from Republican megadonor Harlan Crow. Gorsuch sold property which he disclosed the sale but omitted that the property was purchased by a person whose firm frequently has cases before the high court. Roberts’ wife raised ethical concerns that she was paid large sums for placing lawyers at firms that appear before the court.”

“The justices seem to be utterly clueless about the problem they have ... They’re in a bubble apparently. They don’t see what a big problem they have”

https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-ethics-clarence-thomas-2f3fbc26a4d8fe45c82269127458fa08

Every Court in the US, from local to Federal, has a defined code of conduct with an authority to monitor complaints except the Supreme Court, they supposedly consider themselves above everyone else. They appear totally unconnected with the people who are effected by their decisions, which explains some of the flat out stupid comments some of them make

They are a separate branch, but they are also part of the Federal Gov’t, and as I noted, the only entity within that Government, and even their own branch, without an enforceable code of ethics

Fascinating watching triggered, low IQ lying leftist hacks whine about the court like spoiled little girls.

NO wonder halfwits like you fall for dishonest lie filled stories about Conservative Justices. By the way, why didn't the leftist DOJ take care of protestors breaking our laws in front of Supreme Court Justices and threatening them?

You Fascists are not merely stupid and dishonest, but massive hypocrites as well. :palm:
 
Their also wrong, and they may be judicial experts, although that is also debatable given the last four appointees were approved on a majority vote, but being a judicial expert doesn’t excuse them from being held accountable for what they do outside of the Court or its relation to the cases infront of them


twit
\ ˈtwit \
1: a silly annoying person : FOOL
 
There is plenty of evidence. You would argue that leftists are the friends of black people. Isnt that right? Oh course it is. Unless of course that black person is conservative then they aren't even black. It's clear to anyone with a working brain that leftists don't actually care about any of the issues they claim to care about except to the extent that they advance your agenda. That's why black conservatives are persona non grata to leftists, they don't advance the agenda of "systemic" racism. So once again if you saw this as a "liberal" court you wouldn't be whining at all.

What the f*ck does any of that have to do with thread, let alone the accusations you can’t prove, it is pure talk radio rhetoric
 
your bias is showing

the court has been political since before you and I were born. you continually fail to acknowledge this due to your leftist leanings, every bit as much as those on the right do.

Never to the point where the American people lost confidence in it, that is unique for the Roberts Court, they reversed the very intent of the Founders
 
Back
Top