What holding a gun to someone's neck means

If they were institutionalized, they couldn't get guns.

Democrats don't want them institutionalized.

You must not get out much Mentally unstable people are frequently undiagnosed and refuse to go to a psychiatrist or take meds.

France makes people who want to buy guns undergo a psychiatric evaluation
 
There are 430 million guns in the US so preventing anyone from getting one at this point is simply irrational

France makes anyone who wants to purchase a firearm get a psychiatric evaluation, and get recertified as mentally sound periodically thereafter
 
You must not get out much Mentally unstable people are frequently undiagnosed and refuse to go to a psychiatrist or take meds.

France makes people who want to buy guns undergo a psychiatric evaluation

There are huge numbers of obviously mentally disturbed people roaming the streets of America.

A few decades ago, the liberals started a policy of "mainstreaming" the mentally ill.

Hence, the huge numbers of obviously mentally disturbed people roaming the streets of America.
 
You must not get out much Mentally unstable people are frequently undiagnosed and refuse to go to a psychiatrist or take meds.

France makes people who want to buy guns undergo a psychiatric evaluation

Then if you don’t know who is mentally unstable then how do you keep guns away from them?
 
There are huge numbers of obviously mentally disturbed people roaming the streets of America.

A few decades ago, the liberals started a policy of "mainstreaming the mentally ill.

Hence, the huge numbers of obviously mentally disturbed people roaming the streets of America.

I accept your concession that I was right about undiagnosed mentally unstable people in this country, and there is almost nothing preventing them from purchasing firearms short of a criminal record
 
What my gun hating colleagues on the left fail to realize is that
whether or not private ownership of weapons is good or bad
isn't the relevant issue.

The relevant issue is whether or not people want them.
That determines the law, and the American culture wants guns.

I eat a lot more red meat than is good for my health, but there's no law against it.

The gun-loving right is convinced that the left wants to confiscate all firearms and opposes the basic American right to bear arms.

The reality is that too many liberals are fine with that idea, and so we all get painted with the same brush.

Every liberal who doesn't endorse the basic right to own firearms

while opposing AR-15 type weapons
and opposing the "right" to overthrow a legitimately elected government

is almost as guilty as the idiot Reichnuts
for our not being able to hammer out an intelligent compromise.
 
I accept your concession that I was right about undiagnosed mentally unstable people in this country, and there is almost nothing preventing them from purchasing firearms short of a criminal record

You are confused.

"On Oct. 31, 1963, President John F. Kennedy signed a bill meant to free many thousands of Americans with mental illnesses from life in institutions. It envisioned building 1,500 outpatient mental health centers to offer them community-based care instead.Oct 23, 2013
 
France makes anyone who wants to purchase a firearm get a psychiatric evaluation, and get recertified as mentally sound periodically thereafter

Incorrect, you need an evaluation to get a hunting license not the gun.

You need a hunting license to get a gun.
 
You are confused.

"On Oct. 31, 1963, President John F. Kennedy signed a bill meant to free many thousands of Americans with mental illnesses from life in institutions. It envisioned building 1,500 outpatient mental health centers to offer them community-based care instead.Oct 23, 2013

You're not very quick witted are you. That has nothing to do with what I wrote
 
So a Missouri man really wanted meat, but the meat counter was not staffed. His reaction was to hold a gun to the neck of an employee. He claimed holding a gun to the employee's neck was meant to communicate, "I need you here to help me to get a couple of these steaks. I’m not going to hurt you."
Would it trouble you to much to provide a link?
 
You're not very quick witted are you. That has nothing to do with what I wrote

I accept your concession.

I explained why there are huge numbers of mentally disturbed people walking the streets of America.

The liberal Democratic Socialist loons want them there.
 
Even if he paid for the meat, it is armed robbery. They did not want to sell it to him, and he used a gun to get it.

There needs to be a test before you can own a gun to make sure you understand that a gun is not a magical device to get you all that you want.
It was assault but if he paid for it it wasn't robbery.
 
Otra vez:

Walter, do you own a gun?

I can't invest time in people as slow witted as you. I'm going to have to cut you loose

Anyone who has been in an institution has a diagnosis. The law already provides for preventing gun sales to the diagnosed mentally ill

My posts have explicitly and repeatedly reference the undiagnosed mentally unstable, like homicidal gun nuts and road rage assholes
 
Not funny haha, but funny like disturbing. We are one of the toughest on crime countries, and yet we still have out of control gun violence.

No, Walter, we are not one of the toughest on crime countries.

Institutionalize the crazies roaming America's cities.

Prosecute violent criminals and isolate them from the rest of Americans who don't commit crimes and only want to be left alone.

Deport G. Soros.

Watch crime go back to normal.
 
Back
Top