Seven Dirty Secrets About Liberals

Why should we when they are all patently rediculous claims by Dixie.

Dixie is just trying to marinalize those who don't agree with his extremist point of view. It's nothing new. I can easily do the same thing with anyone who disagrees with me.

You can lie and distort, that's all liberals ever know how to do. I'm not trying to marginalize anything, you're already marginalized, just by being a pinhead liberal. Every point I made is true, if they weren't, you could systematically refute them. As it stands, all you can do is throw out a blanket refutation, and pretend I have been patently ridiculous.
 
Number six appears to be refuted by this thread. Not one of them seems to want to confront this, if they loved it as much as you say they'd be on this like stink in a septic tank.

Not so! You see, this thread reveals the TRUTH about them, and they know it. There is nothing to confront, nothing to fight, nothing to benefit the liberal cause. Anytime these conditions exist, the liberal will run the other way... oh, and if defending freedom and liberty are somehow involved... they run like hell from those fights too!
 
You can lie and distort, that's all liberals ever know how to do. I'm not trying to marginalize anything, you're already marginalized, just by being a pinhead liberal. Every point I made is true, if they weren't, you could systematically refute them. As it stands, all you can do is throw out a blanket refutation, and pretend I have been patently ridiculous.

Your the dumbest assbackward college grad I've ever heard from. But then your from cousin kissing Alabama.:pke:
 
Not so! You see, this thread reveals the TRUTH about them, and they know it. There is nothing to confront, nothing to fight, nothing to benefit the liberal cause. Anytime these conditions exist, the liberal will run the other way... oh, and if defending freedom and liberty are somehow involved... they run like hell from those fights too!

Huh? I thought we loved war.

Why can't you refute my ironclad argument that conservatives are Nazis?
 
Huh? I thought we loved war.

Why can't you refute my ironclad argument that conservatives are Nazis?

Dixie's another chickenshit neocon that not only wouldn't fight in a war he wouldn't even play football. He sits his fat ass on his sofa in the double wide casting dispersions on more learned liberals.
 
Huh? I thought we loved war.

Why can't you refute my ironclad argument that conservatives are Nazis?

Actually Liberals are more Nazi-like than Conservatives. Let's take just one issue, Gay Marriage... Liberals want to invoke judicial rulings on the populace and force us to live by those standards whether we accept them or not... clearly, a Nazi-like tactic. Conservatives, for the most part, understand the problems of homosexual couples, and would be willing to entertain the concept of civil unions, at the very worst, they would be okay with allowing the issue to be settled with ballot initiatives by the people. No conservatives I know of, are trying to ban homosexuality, or force their standards on people through court rulings.
 
Actually Liberals are more Nazi-like than Conservatives. Let's take just one issue, Gay Marriage... Liberals want to invoke judicial rulings on the populace and force us to live by those standards whether we accept them or not... clearly, a Nazi-like tactic. Conservatives, for the most part, understand the problems of homosexual couples, and would be willing to entertain the concept of civil unions, at the very worst, they would be okay with allowing the issue to be settled with ballot initiatives by the people. No conservatives I know of, are trying to ban homosexuality, or force their standards on people through court rulings.

Conservatives boycotted Disney because they didn't like the health insurance policy for homosexual partners.
 
Actually Liberals are more Nazi-like than Conservatives. Let's take just one issue, Gay Marriage... Liberals want to invoke judicial rulings on the populace and force us to live by those standards whether we accept them or not... clearly, a Nazi-like tactic. Conservatives, for the most part, understand the problems of homosexual couples, and would be willing to entertain the concept of civil unions, at the very worst, they would be okay with allowing the issue to be settled with ballot initiatives by the people. No conservatives I know of, are trying to ban homosexuality, or force their standards on people through court rulings.

lets take wars, that's what NAZI's are know for. YOUR boys not you rule at it, your far to chickenshit to fight. Also your party jails kids for something less harmful than beer, that's kinda ghestapo. Now carryon with your faux homophobia.
 
Right, but they didn't run get a court order to shut down Disney! That would have been the "Nazi-like" response if conservatives were like liberals.

Hurting businesses financially to achieve their means is a method of economic intimidation right out of the Nazi playbook.

Besides, you said conservatives "understood the problems" of homosexuals, and were open to civil unions (which would allow health coverage).
 
Hurting businesses financially to achieve their means is a method of economic intimidation right out of the Nazi playbook.

Besides, you said conservatives "understood the problems" of homosexuals, and were open to civil unions (which would allow health coverage).

Apparently you don't understand what Nazism is. Boycotting a business is not Nazism, threatening to shut down the business, IS Nazism.

I did say most conservatives understand the problems of homosexual couples, and would be willing to accept civil unions legislation to solve those problems. I don't know that ALL conservatives feel that way, but I do think most would be willing to allow the states to settle the issue at the ballot box. In no instance do I know of any group of conservatives advocating we ban homosexual behavior or use the judiciary to make homosexuality illegal.
 
That's not completely true. They do dance on the precipice of authoritarianism and balance on the slippery slope towards totalitrianism but there is some distinctions between Right Wing Republicans and Fascist like the Nazi's.

First, though extremely authoritarian, right wing conservatives are more autocratic then totalitarain. Fascism/Nazism is totalitarianism. What makes most American uncomfortable with this is that Authoristarianism gives lip service to our liberties while systematically degrading them to further empower the State. Most people also know that the road to totalitrianism leads through authoritarianism. Right wing conservatives would be more at home with a divine right monarch, then a secular Dictator with absolute powers or a liberal republic with limited powers for that matter.

Secondly, fascism and totalitarian States replace religion with "The State" where as right wing Republicans prefer to nationalize a specific religious belief. They would be (and are) appaled at the idea of replacing religion with a belief in the State. In either case, both point of views are extreme ones and essentially deny others their religious liberties including the right not to believe or practice a religion.

Right wing Republicans have not condonded violence as a means of achieving their political ends at least domestically that is.

However, there are some similarities that right wing republican do have with fascist/Nazi's.

The identification and marginalization of a specific group of people as a threat to the State (for Nazi that was the Jews. For right wing Republicans that would be Liberals, Blacks and Immigrants).

Intolerance within the political framework for dissenting views.

A wide spread and comprehensive political propaganda network that glorifies nationalism, exagerates threats to the nation, specifically identifies groups of peoples as a threat to the nation and marginalizes those who dissent as treasonous. The similarities between US right wing media (Fox News, Newsmax, right wing talk radio) and Goebbels propaganda model are not superficial or coincidental.

Like fascist/Nazi's right wing Republicans marginalize intellectuals as being elitist. This is understandable and those who are educated are the most likely to communicate the failings and lies of their political movements and are therefore a grave threat to their political movement.

Bigotry. Right wing Republicans prey upon the ignorance of the poor and uneducated by manipulating their racial and ethnic bigotry. The Nazi's exploited anti-semitism and racial hatred of ethnic Slavs. In the US it's southern conservatives and their bigotry and fear toward Blacks. Can anyone doubt that this is the ultimate factor behind the motivations of people like the Birthers? With more and more assimilation of Blacks into the American mainstream this misquided bigotry from conservatives is being placed more often on Mexicans and Immigrants though a healthy fear of Blacks still exist in most rural and southern white conservatives.


An ideology doesn't necessarily have to be statist to be dangerous.

Combine a lack of respect for human life with strong government and you get gas chambers, combine it with weak government and you get lynch mobs.
 
Actually Liberals are more Nazi-like than Conservatives. Let's take just one issue, Gay Marriage... Liberals want to invoke judicial rulings on the populace and force us to live by those standards whether we accept them or not... clearly, a Nazi-like tactic. Conservatives, for the most part, understand the problems of homosexual couples, and would be willing to entertain the concept of civil unions, at the very worst, they would be okay with allowing the issue to be settled with ballot initiatives by the people. No conservatives I know of, are trying to ban homosexuality, or force their standards on people through court rulings.

LOL wow.

First off, nazism was a highly populist ideology. They had the will of the people behind them. If only they had had courts standing in the way of the people, things might have turned out differently.
 
Apparently you don't understand what Nazism is. Boycotting a business is not Nazism, threatening to shut down the business, IS Nazism.

I did say most conservatives understand the problems of homosexual couples, and would be willing to accept civil unions legislation to solve those problems. I don't know that ALL conservatives feel that way, but I do think most would be willing to allow the states to settle the issue at the ballot box. In no instance do I know of any group of conservatives advocating we ban homosexual behavior or use the judiciary to make homosexuality illegal.

Dehumanizing is also a Nazi tactic, which you do regularly by equating homosexuality with bestiality and pedophilia.
 
An ideology doesn't necessarily have to be statist to be dangerous.

Combine a lack of respect for human life with strong government and you get gas chambers, combine it with weak government and you get lynch mobs.
No greater liberal than Tom Jefferson said it best. A society with out law is chaos. Law with out conscience is tyranny.
 
Apparently you don't understand what Nazism is. Boycotting a business is not Nazism, threatening to shut down the business, IS Nazism.

I did say most conservatives understand the problems of homosexual couples, and would be willing to accept civil unions legislation to solve those problems. I don't know that ALL conservatives feel that way, but I do think most would be willing to allow the states to settle the issue at the ballot box. In no instance do I know of any group of conservatives advocating we ban homosexual behavior or use the judiciary to make homosexuality illegal.

Rule of law above mob rule is the American way...

Mob rule (majority rule) over rule of law is Natzi.
 
Dehumanizing is also a Nazi tactic, which you do regularly by equating homosexuality with bestiality and pedophilia.

Bestiality and pedophilia are human sexual deviancy, they can't be 'dehuman' in nature, it's not logical or possible, it contradicts what they are. Homosexuality is also a human sexual deviancy. That is meant in the clinical sense, not as a derogatory moral assessment. It occurs in a small percentage of the species, like any and all deviant behavior! This is basic science, not a moral statement.

In order to deal with matters regarding homosexual behavior, we must be intellectually honest about what we are dealing with, we can't hide behind false emotional justifications because they are politically correct for the times. I understand there are homosexual people, just like there are pedophiles, and any other deviancy in behavior, people are different. My position and view regarding laws and 'rights' of individuals, has a great deal to do with recognizing what we are dealing with, and not allowing the 'politically correct' society to dictate that for me. We can't start altering our laws to placate the 'needs' of a sexually deviant behavior, it paves the way for allowance of ALL sexually deviant behaviors on the same basis! We guarantee that in the Constitution, France and Europe DON'T! Other societies can adopt "Gay Marriage" and draw the 'morality' line there, but we can't... we have a Constitution that guarantees equal protection under the law, and if we allow "Gay" marriage, we have to allow "Pet" marriage!

It's not Nazistic for me to make that point. It IS Nazistic for you to continue to force your immoral culture down our throat against the will of the people. 31 times Gay Marriage has been rejected at the ballot box, and the only places it exists by law, it has been 'deemed' legal by a court or judge, not by the will of the people.... standard Nazism.
 
Why should we when they are all patently rediculous claims by Dixie.

Dixie is just trying to marinalize those who don't agree with his extremist point of view. It's nothing new. I can easily do the same thing with anyone who disagrees with me.

You have to stop drinking in the mornings!
 
Back
Top