Biggest lies of the decade!

Jarod

Well-known member
Contributor
Being against freedom for Gays to marry.... is achually being for freedom to those who are against it....

So wanting to limit freedom of a group is giving more freedom to a group that does not even want that freedom.
 
funny how that works, huh.

A pittifull and silly argument.

So if I were against allowing brown eyed people from marrying blue eyed people, those polititians who supported my campaign would be on the side of more personal freedom for Americans?

So if I were pro-slavery, but only the slavery of White Women, I'd be supporting freedom for those who want to perserve the institution of enslavement of those of African blood?
 
I am starting how conservatism works, its not about freedom, its about how you can justify less freedom while calling it more freedom...!
 
If freedom is less freedom, much like up is down, and right is left... they way Social Conservatives describe freedom, I hate it also.

you can't just claim social conservatives....you need to be honest and admit obama and i have no doubt other dems, i believe hillary, biden....do not support gay marriage

fwiw....it shows ignorance when you make threads like this and start bashing only social conservatives
 
you can't just claim social conservatives....you need to be honest and admit obama and i have no doubt other dems, i believe hillary, biden....do not support gay marriage

fwiw....it shows ignorance when you make threads like this and start bashing only social conservatives

I agree they are wrong on the Gay Marriage issue, but they support Civil Unions which is a half step better.

They also are not making it a wedge issue to try to stir up there base, little consulation but a shade better.
 
I agree they are wrong on the Gay Marriage issue, but they support Civil Unions which is a half step better.

They also are not making it a wedge issue to try to stir up there base, little consulation but a shade better.

actually, a lot of social conservatives support civil unions
 
You queer enablers crack me up. Thinking that deviant behavior gives folks the right to change a 5000 year tradition that forms the basic building block of society. LOL
 
You queer enablers crack me up. Thinking that deviant behavior gives folks the right to change a 5000 year tradition that forms the basic building block of society. LOL

Gays are perfectly able to be queer. We are being marriage enablers! Get the terminology right.

And actually, quite a few of us marriage enablers want to remove all government involvement in marriage. We want the government to be limited rather than expanded.
 
And just to be clear, the biggest lies of the decade were the same lies told in the previous decade:


The check is in the mail.

I promise I won't cum in your mouth.

I'm from the government and I'm here to help.
 
Gays are perfectly able to be queer. We are being marriage enablers! Get the terminology right.

And actually, quite a few of us marriage enablers want to remove all government involvement in marriage. We want the government to be limited rather than expanded.
You're obviously a faggot for thinking that way.
 
You're obviously a faggot for thinking that way.

You want the gov't to protect your beliefs. You want the gov't to solve your problems. You want the gov't to protect your idea of marriage and to interfere in people's lives.

You're obviously a liberal for thinking that way.
 
You queer enablers crack me up. Thinking that deviant behavior gives folks the right to change a 5000 year tradition that forms the basic building block of society. LOL

Not to change the subject but I've always wondered about the Conservative/Right Wing thinking when it comes to families and society.

The traditions of family, supporting the values regarding helping each other and working together is what the Conservative/Right Wing have always championed. However, when it comes to others, other families, other people, society in general, their attitude is "to hell with them".

If the idea of family working together and looking out for each other is a basic building block of society then why do they not support expanding that idea in society?

Social programs similar to how a family would function. Medical plans. Welfare plans. Daycare. Why would they not support the very ways under which families operate knowing the benefits derived?
 
Back
Top