Fact check throws cold water on global ‘boiling’ claims

Last edited:
More completely false/manipulated data from the lying-ass Climatistas/Warmists.

What a shocker...like ALL LEFTISTS, from BLM on, if the facts don't fit the preferred narrative...JUST LIE.




Fact check throws cold water on global ‘boiling’ claims


July was hot — no doubt about it. And media reporting on the heat wave was a raging wildfire of global warming hype.

But was it the worst-ever July scorcher, as the Washington Post, the Associated Press, USA Today, and others reported?

According to a group of fact-checkers who dug through the reports, the weather didn’t live up to the hype.

In fact, the July “Media Climate Fact Check” turned around a Washington Post claim about July being the hottest in 125,000 years, headlining the report, “Worst Media Coverage In 125,000 Years.”

In picking apart specific media stories about the heat, the report provided to Secrets acknowledged the unusual heat wave. But it also cited two anomalies that skewed the data: the impact of El Nino and a two-day spike in Antarctica’s temperature that helped raise the so-called “global temperature.”

What’s more, it noted that since U.S. satellite data on global temperatures have only been collected since 1979, it is impossible to compare temperatures from 100 years ago — or 125,000.

“That heat wave was only detected and factored into average global temperature because of satellite coverage of the globe. But satellite coverage didn’t begin until 1979. So similar heat waves that may have occurred before 1979 would be unknown and not factored into average global temperature calculations,” read the report.


July was hot — no doubt about it. And media reporting on the heat wave was a raging wildfire of global warming hype.

But was it the worst-ever July scorcher, as the Washington Post, the Associated Press, USA Today, and others reported?



According to a group of fact-checkers who dug through the reports, the weather didn’t live up to the hype.

In fact, the July “Media Climate Fact Check” turned around a Washington Post claim about July being the hottest in 125,000 years, headlining the report, “Worst Media Coverage In 125,000 Years.”

In picking apart specific media stories about the heat, the report provided to Secrets acknowledged the unusual heat wave. But it also cited two anomalies that skewed the data: the impact of El Nino and a two-day spike in Antarctica’s temperature that helped raise the so-called “global temperature.”

What’s more, it noted that since U.S. satellite data on global temperatures have only been collected since 1979, it is impossible to compare temperatures from 100 years ago — or 125,000.

“That heat wave was only detected and factored into average global temperature because of satellite coverage of the globe. But satellite coverage didn’t begin until 1979. So similar heat waves that may have occurred before 1979 would be unknown and not factored into average global temperature calculations,” read the report.


“So it is not possible to claim that July 2023 was the ‘hottest month in the history of civilization’ because such data does not exist,” read the analysis from the Competitive Enterprise Institute, the Heartland Institute, the Energy & Environment Legal Institute, the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow, the International Climate Science Coalition, and Truth in Energy and Climate.

Those organizations have long urged the media to tap the brakes on the climate change hype, but news outlets have stomped the accelerator instead in recent years.

What their report aims to do is counter the most outrageous reports with simple facts. The July report cited 10 media claims.

~ The AP reported that the ocean off Florida’s southern tip was like a “hot tub” and the “hottest seawater ever measured.” The fact-checkers, however, noted that the example wasn’t of the open ocean but a very shallow bay and not even a record high.

And USA Today reported that the extreme heat was a top killer. “Every year since 2000, an average of 20,000 people have died from extreme heat in European cities,” the outlet reported, citing a scientific paper. The fact check mocked that story, noting that cold kills far more than heat.




https://www.msn.com/en-us/weather/t...p&cvid=c2ec237204a742608d51f4b8020f8160&ei=13




2jopi9.jpg

Here’s a shocker. Every one of those contributors to this “report” are climate denial organizations. Not scientific ones.

Kinda like tobacco companies writing a report on the safety of cigarettes
 
Here’s a shocker. Every one of those contributors to this “report” are climate denial organizations. Not scientific ones.

Kinda like tobacco companies writing a report on the safety of cigarettes

So says Mr. Cuntwhistle, with his IPv6 enabled charcoal smoker.
 
Is that your answer? Pathetic is mine!!

The U.S. Climate Reference Network (USCRN) is a systematic and sustained network of climate monitoring stations with sites across the contiguous U.S., Alaska, and Hawaii. These stations use high-quality instruments to measure temperature, precipitation, soil conditions, and more. USCRN provides a continuous series of climate observations to monitor national climate trends and support climate-impact research.

The USCRN is made up of over 143 stations in the United States . Its purpose is to maintain a sustainable high quality network which will detect, with high confidence, signals of climate change in the US.[1] It provides the United States with a reference network that meets the requirements of the Global Climate Observing System.

The primary goal of the USCRN is to provide future long-term high-quality observations of surface air temperature and precipitation that can be coupled to past long-term observations for the detection and attribution of present and future climate change. It records data with minimal time dependent biases affecting the interpretation of decadal to centennial climate variability and change.

https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/products/land-based-station/us-climate-reference-network

The original intention was to have thousands of high quality monitoring stations but sadly politicians are reluctant to pay for it. Democrats especially are more than happy to have monitoring stations which are located in cities, airports and subject to the urban heat island effect.
 
Last edited:

Watts Up with That


Overall, we rate Watts Up with That a strong pseudoscience and conspiracy website based on promoting consistent human-influenced climate denialism propaganda and several failed fact checks


Bias Rating: CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/watts-up-with-that/

NOAA has updated its U.S. Contiguous USCRN

Doubt if you even heard of the USCRN because you're a fucking cretin who relies on a website like MB/FC to do your thinking for you. If you spent less time listening to obscure radio signals and more on reading up on actual science you might not be so brain dead.

U.S. Climate Reference Network (USCRN) Station Data
Associated Agencies
NOAA's National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) and Air Resources Laboratory (ARL)


The U.S. Climate Reference Network (USCRN) is a system of climate observing stations developed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), with sites across the continental U.S., Alaska, and Hawaii. These stations use high-quality instruments to measure temperature, precipitation, wind speed, soil conditions, solar radiation, and more.

The vision of the USCRN program is to provide a continuous series of climate observations for monitoring trends in the nation's climate and supporting climate-impact research.

USCRN stations are managed and maintained by the Atmospheric Turbulence and Diffusion Division of the NOAA Air Resources Laboratory. NOAA’s National Centers for Environmental Information maintains and distributes the USCRN observations and derived climate products. The USCRN is also part of the multi-agency National Coordinated Soil Moisture Monitoring Network (NCSMMN).

https://www.drought.gov/data-maps-tools/us-climate-reference-network-uscrn-station-data
 
Back
Top