Rep. Jamaal Bowman pulls fire alarm ahead of vote to pass short-term funding bill

[Earl]

I hear you. I just won't vote for Trump even if he is the nominee, that's the only difference here. It's okay, I don't think my vote will make the difference. I don't think my vote would count even if I voted for Trump as this state votes Ds and I do not. I mean they'll count my vote, but even if I voted for Trump the electoral votes of this state will go to whomever has a D by their name no matter how I vote.

If Trump is the nominee, a non-vote for Trump is one vote for the Democratic nominee.

 

[Nomad]

on Truth Social he said: "Do you throw the Presidential Election Results of 2020 OUT and declare the RIGHTFUL WINNER, or do you have a NEW ELECTION? A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution..."

so. he did what I said and suggested suspending the parts of the constitution he didn't like. To this I say no, and anyone who thinks they are more important than the Constitution deserves none of my support. Even if voting for them would really punish someone else largely ignoring the constitution.

So, who else is "largely ignoring the constitution", and how are they supposedly doing so?

 

[Yakuda]

So, who else is "largely ignoring the constitution", and how are they supposedly doing so?

The right to hear arms shall not be infringed. Let's see.....who are the anti gun nuts? Hmmmmmm

Who wants to do away with the electoral college so two states elect the president?

As I think about it leftists don't want to ignore the constitution they want to destroy it.

 

[Controlled Opposition]

What did your shit writers write on the walls you fucking democracy hater?

What did they write on the walls? Do you have any links?

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Wonderful

But, but, but, IT'S MTG! Your argument is invalid!

What a crock. Bowman knowingly pulled a fire alarm to disrupt Congress while in session and that's all there is to that. In Washington DC, that's a serious felony.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

None of your fucking trump rioters obeyed any signs or POLICE ORDERS

 

[Damocles]

Bowman was basically doing an insurrection.

This made me actually LOL with real noises coming from my head that sounded like laughter and stuff.

 

[domer76]

The right to hear arms shall not be infringed. Let's see.....who are the anti gun nuts? Hmmmmmm

Who wants to do away with the electoral college so two states elect the president?

As I think about it leftists don't want to ignore the constitution they want to destroy it.

The right’s hero, Scalia, said guns can be controlled. Time, place, manufacture, sale, type.

Write SCOTUS with your expert opinion. I’m sure they’ll give it all the consideration it deserves.

 

[Into the Night]

I hear you. I just won't vote for Trump even if he is the nominee, that's the only difference here. It's okay, I don't think my vote will make the difference. I don't think my vote would count even if I voted for Trump as this state votes Ds and I do not. I mean they'll count my vote, but even if I voted for Trump the electoral votes of this state will go to whomever has a D by their name no matter how I vote.

Considering your State, that's probably true.

 

[Into the Night]

You make a good point about Pedo Don being a liar; he says one thing and does another. He promised to pardon his supporters then threw them under the bus. He wants to suspend the Constitution and didn't. He wants to execute military leaders and won't lift a finger to make it happen. He promised to only appoint the best people and didn't. He promised to build a wall and make Mexico pay for it and didn't.

Pedo Don is a liar. Thanks for agreeing, Yak.

You completely ignored post #309, which you responded to. Biden is not Trump. Don't try to project Biden's problems on Trump.

 

[Controlled Opposition]

It is strange that all of those fools attempted an insurrection, but not of them thought to bring firearms.

 

[Into the Night]

Nonsense, in order to believe that it is something he's saying "they" are doing you have to take it out of the context I have supplied.

Inversion fallacy. It is YOU taking things out of context. Contextomy fallacy.

You took my post out of context.
You are taking Trumps comment out of context.

You cannot blame your problem on anybody else.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Trump.

Mantra 56 Delusional denial of the obvious

Mantra 58 Dumbfuckery

Mantra 1a.

Mantra 4a.

One of the "miscellaneous" documents on that site is Into the Night's mantra list.

 

[Into the Night]

The right’s hero, Scalia, said guns can be controlled. Time, place, manufacture, sale, type.

Write SCOTUS with your expert opinion. I’m sure they’ll give it all the consideration it deserves.

SCOTUS has no authority to change the Constitution.

 

[Damocles]

Inversion fallacy. It is YOU taking things out of context. Contextomy fallacy.

You took my post out of context.
You are taking Trumps comment out of context.

You cannot blame your problem on anybody else.

I have posted the entire post, the whole of the context. That is exactly the opposite of taking it out of context. No matter how many times you repeat it, it will continue to be false. I have provided context, given you the entirety of the post, and you simply project what you want into the conversation willy-nilly. The only person out of context here is the one that ignores the context to tell me to stop believing my "lying eyes" and start believing what you tell me to believe. The problem here is that it simply doesn't work.

No matter how many times you post something that isn't true it will still not be true the next time you post it. Like Biden you can't stop yourself from repeating what has already been shown to be a falsehood.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

It is strange that all of those fools attempted an insurrection, but not of them thought to bring firearms.

You've been in the Rubber Room too long, Señor Cabra

https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/21/politics/january-6-capitol-rioter-guns-sentenced/index.html
Jan. 6 rioter who brought guns onto US Capitol grounds sentenced to 5 years in jail

Mark Mazza, 56, entered the Capitol grounds armed with two handguns, one of which – a revolver called the “Judge” loaded with shotgun shells and hollow point bullets – he lost on the lower west terrace just outside the building.

https://www.npr.org/2022/03/08/1085...y-reffitt-has-been-found-guilty-on-all-counts
Jan. 6 Capitol riot defendant Guy Reffitt has been found guilty on all counts

A federal jury deliberated for just three hours before convicting the defendant, Guy Reffitt, on obstruction and weapons charges.

 

[Controlled Opposition]

Thsnks, but go guck yourself, you obnoxious fraud.

 

[Nomad]

The right to hear arms shall not be infringed. Let's see.....who are the anti gun nuts? Hmmmmmm

Who wants to do away with the electoral college so two states elect the president?

As I think about it leftists don't want to ignore the constitution they want to destroy it.

Amending and changing the Constitution is constitutional.

 

[Into the Night]

I have posted the entire post, the whole of the context.
That is exactly the opposite of taking it out of context.

You posted the entire post, then took portions of it out of context.

No matter how many times you repeat it, it will continue to be false.

Assumption of victory fallacy. Attempted proof by void.

I have provided context, given you the entirety of the post, and you simply project what you want into the conversation willy-nilly.

Inversion fallacy. This is what YOU are doing.

The only person out of context here is the one that ignores the context to tell me to stop believing my "lying eyes" and start believing what you tell me to believe.

A nonsense statement. Try English. It works better.

The problem here is that it simply doesn't work.

Fallacies don't work. They are errors in logic.

No matter how many times you post something that isn't true it will still not be true the next time you post it. Like Biden you can't stop yourself from repeating what has already been shown to be a falsehood.

Assumption of victory fallacy. Attempted proof by void. Repetition fallacy. Association fallacy. Pivot fallacy.

You cannot just claim victory.
You cannot attempt a proof by just claiming victory.
You are repeating yourself (chanting).
You are attempting to associate Trump with Biden, and even attempting to blame Trump because of Biden.
You are trying to change the subject (pivot).
Some of your sentences are no longer making sense.

Look, you've made the very valid point that no matter how you vote, the 'D's win, because the kind of State you live in. I happen to agree with this. That is sufficient. You do not need to try to tell me the meaning of Trump's post or try to change it.

Let's leave it here.

 

[Into the Night]

Amending and changing the Constitution is constitutional.

The Supreme Court has no authority to amend or change the Constitution. Congress has no authority to amend or change the Constitution.

Nothing in the Constitution gives the federal government any authority to ban or limit guns.
I don't think your idea of amending the Constitution so States give up their authority and representation is going to work. Remember, only the States can amend the Constitution.