Matt Dillon
Retardium User
It seems like there were so many warnings w/ this guy.
It's really a textbook case for where it's appropriate to limit the right to own a gun.
It's not the guns, it's the crazy people.

It seems like there were so many warnings w/ this guy.
It's really a textbook case for where it's appropriate to limit the right to own a gun.
the rights of the people (plural) are
the right of an Individual is obviously not
Enlighten us on what the "clear bright line" is?
It's not the guns, it's the crazy people.![]()
you've never been willing to accept it before, so why should I bother lecturing you again? you always resort to hyperbolic extremism to avoid acceptance of reality regarding the Constitution.
the right of the people plural shall not be abridged - yes
individuals can have rights restricted so long as we follow due process against said individual.
otherwise prisoners in jail would be packing
He had told people he was considering a mass shooting. The military division he was in knew of his mental problems. The police know of his issues....
Did he have an absolute right to bear arms?
Several of the barrel strokers on this forum will tell you ‘yes’. They will also tell you that all the deaths from those firearms are acceptable collateral damage in order to possess that right.
Several of the barrel strokers on this forum will tell you ‘yes’. They will also tell you that all the deaths from those firearms are acceptable collateral damage in order to possess that right.
Prior to his doing what he did what did he do to justify suspending his right to own one?
He had told people he was considering a mass shooting. The military division he was in knew of his mental problems. The police know of his issues....
Did he have an absolute right to bear arms?
it's mystifying how I have to keep lecturing you about absolute rights and how the 5th Amendment works in conjunction with absolute rights.........
So, should people be allowed to own an ICBM?
Why do mass shootings of this scale almost always involve semiautomatic assault rifles with high capacity ammunition mags, rather than shotguns, revolvers, bolt action hunting rifles?
A high capacity ammunition mag is a battlefield innovation, intended to inflict higher casually rates on the enemy. They have no legitimate civilian use.
liberty is more important than safety, so sayeth ben franklin
isn't a nation people?
People who are mentally ill can not legally own an AR15. This guy was hearing voices and Maine dropped the ball.He had told people he was considering a mass shooting. The military division he was in knew of his mental problems. The police know of his issues....
Did he have an absolute right to bear arms?
false information is not being schooled.It’s mystifying that you’ve been schooled time and again that there is no such thing as an absolute right.
and you've never answered the question 'is there a right to drive a vehicle'.............your lack of cognitive abilities has now been exposed...........again.Yet, you do believe “vehicles cannot be necessary” in a modern society, too. So, there’s that demonstration of your cognitive abilities.
I somewhat agree with Franklin, but there is a ballance.